Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yung-Yu Chung

dblp:69/11213 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › stream processing
distributed stream processing
0.212016
A Simple Message-Optimal Algorithm for Random Sampling from a Distributed Stream · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2016
Distributed systems
random sampling
0.212016
A Simple Message-Optimal Algorithm for Random Sampling from a Distributed Stream · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2016
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.212016
A Simple Message-Optimal Algorithm for Random Sampling from a Distributed Stream · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
feature fusion
0.112012
A Novel Multiple Kernel Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Feature Fusion and Variable Selection · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2012
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning
0.112012
A Novel Multiple Kernel Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Feature Fusion and Variable Selection · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2012
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.112012
A Novel Multiple Kernel Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Feature Fusion and Variable Selection · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2012
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
group lasso
0.112012
A Novel Multiple Kernel Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Feature Fusion and Variable Selection · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound analysis · 0.5distributed sampling · 0.5multiple kernel learning · 0.3mixed-norm regularization · 0.3group lasso · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A Simple Message-Optimal Algorithm for Random Sampling from a Distributed Stream
abstract
We present a simple, message-optimal algorithm for maintaining a random sample from a large data stream whose input elements are distributed across multiple sites that communicate via a central coordinator. At any point in time, the set of elements held by the coordinator represent a uniform random sample from the set of all the elements observed so far. When compared with prior work, our algorithms asymptotically improve the total number of messages sent in the system. We present a matching lower bound, showing that our protocol sends the optimal number of messages up to a constant factor with large probability. We also consider the important case when the distribution of elements across different sites is non-uniform, and show that for such inputs, our algorithm significantly outperforms prior solutions.
Yung-Yu Chung, Srikanta Tirthapura, David P. Woodruff
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2012 A Novel Multiple Kernel Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Feature Fusion and Variable Selection
abstract
We propose a novel multiple kernel learning (MKL) algorithm with a group lasso regularizer, called group lasso regularized MKL (GL-MKL), for heterogeneous feature fusion and variable selection. For problems of feature fusion, assigning a group of base kernels for each feature type in an MKL framework provides a robust way in fitting data extracted from different feature domains. Adding a mixed norm constraint (i.e., group lasso) as the regularizer, we can enforce the sparsity at the group/feature level and automatically learn a compact feature set for recognition purposes. More precisely, our GL-MKL determines the optimal base kernels, including the associated weights and kernel parameters, and results in improved recognition performance. Besides, our GL-MKL can also be extended to address heterogeneous variable selection problems. For such problems, we aim to select a compact set of variables (i.e., feature attributes) for comparable or improved performance. Our proposed method does not need to exhaustively search for the entire variable space like prior sequential-based variable selection methods did, and we do not require any prior knowledge on the optimal size of the variable subset either. To verify the effectiveness and robustness of our GL-MKL, we conduct experiments on video and image datasets for heterogeneous feature fusion, and perform variable selection on various UCI datasets.
Yi-Ren Yeh, Ting-Chu Lin, Yung-Yu Chung, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang
IEEE Trans. Multim.3
2011 Group lasso regularized multiple kernel learning for heterogeneous feature selection
abstract
We propose a novel multiple kernel learning (MKL) algorithm with a group lasso regularizer, called group lasso regularized MKL (GL-MKL), for heterogeneous feature selection. We extend the existing MKL algorithm and impose a mixed ℓ1and ℓ2norm constraint (known as group lasso) as the regularizer. Our GL-MKL determines the optimal base kernels, including the associated weights and kernel parameters, and results in a compact set of features for comparable or improved recognition performance. The use of our GL-MKL avoids the problem of choosing the proper technique to normalize the feature attributes collected from heterogeneous domains (and thus with different properties and distribution ranges). Our approach does not need to exhaustively search for the entire feature space when performing feature selection like prior sequential-based feature selection methods did, and we do not require any prior knowledge on the optimal size of the feature subset either. Comparisons with existing MKL or sequential-based feature selection methods on a variety of datasets confirm the effectiveness of our method in selecting a compact feature subset for comparable or improved classification performance.
Yi-Ren Yeh, Yung-Yu Chung, Ting-Chu Lin, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang
IJCNN2