Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emmanuel Rodriguez

dblp:69/295 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational fabrication · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational fabrication › structural design
bending-active structures
0.612022
Computational Design of Laser-Cut Bending-Active Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Computational fabrication › subtractive manufacturing
laser cutting
0.612022
Computational Design of Laser-Cut Bending-Active Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Automated reasoning and model checking
compositional verification
0.212015
Compositional Model Checking of Concurrent Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.212015
Compositional Model Checking of Concurrent Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Computational fabrication
computational design
0.212022
Computational Design of Laser-Cut Bending-Active Structures · Comput. Aided Des. 2022
Program verification
concurrent program verification
0.112015
Compositional Model Checking of Concurrent Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
state space explosion
0.112015
Compositional Model Checking of Concurrent Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial order reduction · 0.4compositional reduction · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Computational Design of Laser-Cut Bending-Active Structures
Emmanuel Rodriguez, Georges-Pierre Bonneau, Stefanie Hahmann, Mélina Skouras
Comput. Aided Des.1
2015 Improving REST Service Discovery with Unsupervised Learning Techniques
abstract
Discovery and replacement are two of the main features of Service Oriented Computing. There has been much research on these topics for traditional SOAP-based Web Services, particularly on discovery. Although the original proposal for REST services lacks this feature, some researchers have studied how to perform discovery for REST services using both IR based techniques and semantic techniques. This work presents a novel IR-based discovery approach for REST services described via WADL files. Our approach takes advantage of unsupervised machine learning techniques for improving discovering results. In particular, the approach relies on clustering algorithms, such as K-means or X-means, to reduce the search space for a given query. The experimental results show that using an appropriate clustering technique, our approach achieves nearly 4 times higher F-measure than a traditional IR-based search engine, namely Apache Lucene. Additionally, the paper reports other metrics, such as Recall, Precision, Precision at-10 and Recall at-10, that also point out that the proposed approach outperforms Lucene. Finally, another important contribution is a set of queries and WADL files gathered from the Internet that can be used for evaluating future discovery proposals.
Juan Manuel Rodriguez, Alejandro Zunino, Cristian Mateos, Felix Oscar Segura, Emmanuel Rodriguez
CISIS5
2015 Compositional Model Checking of Concurrent Systems
abstract
This paper presents a compositional framework to address the state explosion problem in model checking of concurrent systems. This framework takes as input a system model described as a network of communicating components in a high-level description language, finds the local state transition models for each individual component where local properties can be verified, and then iteratively reduces and composes the component state transition models to form a reduced global model for the entire system where global safety properties can be verified. The state space reductions used in this framework result in a reduced model that contains the exact same set of observably equivalent executions as in the original model, therefore, no false counter-examples result from the verification of the reduced model. This approach allows designs that cannot be handled monolithically or with partial-order reduction to be verified without difficulty. The experimental results show significant scale-up of this compositional verification framework on a number of non-trivial concurrent system models.
Hao Zheng 0001, Zhen Zhang 0006, Chris J. Myers, Emmanuel Rodriguez
IEEE Trans. Computers4