In Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis (FFCA), concept lattices are computed by scaling the problem and applying ordinary FCA algorithms. In this paper, the CbO family of algorithms is extended to work natively in the fuzzy setting, they are proved to be correct and output the whole set of formal concepts, which makes them mathematically equivalent to the scaling approach. However, experimental results demonstrate the performance improvement of these methods compared to scaling. The paper also discusses a new fuzzy strategy based on blacklisting redundant truth values to enhance the performance of algorithms by taking advantage of the structure of the residuated lattice.

Simplification logic, a logic for attribute implications, was originally defined for Boolean sets. It was extended to distributive fuzzy sets by using a complete dual Heyting algebra. In this paper, we weaken this restriction in the sense that we prove that it is possible to define a simplification logic on fuzzy sets in which the membership value structure is not necessarily distributive. For this purpose, we replace the structure of the complete dual Heyting algebra by the so-called weak complete dual Heyting algebra. We demonstrate the soundness and completeness of this simplification logic, and provide a characterisation of the operations defining weak complete dual Heyting algebras.

In this paper, we present a novel approach for sentiment analysis that uses Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) to create dictionaries for classification. Unlike other methods that rely on pre-defined lexicons, our approach allows for the creation of customised dictionaries that are tailored to the specific data and tasks. By using a dataset of tweets categorised into positive and negative polarity, we show that our approach achieves a better performance than other standard dictionaries.

This paper aims to contribute to the extension of classical Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), allowing the management of unknown information. In a preliminary paper, we define a new kind of attribute implications to represent the knowledge from the information currently available. The whole FCA framework has to be appropriately extended to manage unknown information. This paper introduces a new logic for reasoning with this kind of implications, which belongs to the family of logics with an underlying Simplification paradigm. Specifically, we introduce a new algebra, named weak dual Heyting Algebra, that allows us to extend the Simplification logic for these new implications. To provide a solid framework, we also prove its soundness and completeness and show the advantages of the Simplification paradigm. Finally, to allow further use of this extension of FCA in applications, an algorithm for automated reasoning, which is directly built from logic, is defined.

In this sequel to our previous article (Corderoet al., 2020) on general inference systems for reasoning with if–then dependencies, we study transformations of if–then rules to semantically equivalent collections of if–then rules suitable to solve several problems related to reasoning with data dependencies. We work in a framework of general lattice-based if–then rules whose semantics is parameterized by systems of isotone Galois connections. This framework allows us to obtain theoretical insight as well as algorithms on a general level and observe their special cases by choosing various types of parameterizations. This way, we study methods for automated reasoning with different types of if–then rules in a single framework that covers existing as well as novel types of rules. Our approach supports a large family of if–then rules, including fuzzy if–then rules with various types of semantics. The main results in this article include new observations on the syntactic inference of if–then rules, complete collections of rules, reduced normal forms of collections of rules, and automated reasoning methods. We demonstrate the generality of the framework and the results by examples of their particular cases focusing on fuzzy if–then rules.

In this paper, we define a sound and complete inference system for triadic implications generated from a formal triadic context , where G, M, and B are object, attribute, and condition sets, respectively, and I is a ternary relation . The inference system is expressed as a set of axioms “à la Armstrong.” The type of triadic implications we are considering in this paper is called conditional attribute implication (CAI) and has the following form: , where X and Y are subsets of M, and is a subset of B. Such implication states that Ximplies Y under all conditions in and any subset of it. Moreover, we propose a method to compute CAIs from Biedermann's implications. We also introduce an algorithm to compute the closure of an attribute set X w.r.t. a set Σ of CAIs given a set of conditions.