VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wim van Dam
dblp:69/5804
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-7852-6158ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 18 · 8 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
15 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 56% Computational complexity · 31% Algorithms and data structures · 9% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 35, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms |
0.6 | 8 | 2016 | Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial Interpolation · ICALP 2016 Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation · SIAM J. Comput. 2007 Quantum algorithm for a generalized hidden shift problem · SODA 2007 |
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity |
0.3 | 3 | 2016 | Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial Interpolation · ICALP 2016 Quantum Bounded Query Complexity · CCC 1999 Quantum Oracle Interrogation: Getting All Information for Almost Half the Price · FOCS 1998 |
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
polynomial interpolation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial Interpolation · ICALP 2016 |
Computational complexity › query complexity
query complexity lower bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial Interpolation · ICALP 2016 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
hidden shift problem |
0.2 | 3 | 2007 | Quantum algorithm for a generalized hidden shift problem · SODA 2007 Quantum Algorithms for Some Hidden Shift Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 2006 Quantum algorithms for some hidden shift problems · SODA 2003 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computational models
adiabatic quantum computation |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation · SIAM J. Comput. 2007 Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation · FOCS 2004 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum error correction
fault-tolerant quantum computation |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Self-Testing of Universal and Fault-Tolerant Sets of Quantum Gates · SIAM J. Comput. 2007 Self-testing of universal and fault-tolerant sets of quantum gates · STOC 2000 |
Computational complexity › property testing
self-testing |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Self-Testing of Universal and Fault-Tolerant Sets of Quantum Gates · SIAM J. Comput. 2007 Self-testing of universal and fault-tolerant sets of quantum gates · STOC 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum gates
universal gate sets |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Self-Testing of Universal and Fault-Tolerant Sets of Quantum Gates · SIAM J. Comput. 2007 Self-testing of universal and fault-tolerant sets of quantum gates · STOC 2000 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum security |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial Interpolation · ICALP 2016 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
hidden subgroup problem |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups · FOCS 2005 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › group theory
nonabelian groups |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups · FOCS 2005 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum measurement › quantum state discrimination
pretty good measurement |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups · FOCS 2005 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum foundations |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
quantum nonlocality |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation · FOCS 2004 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum computing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation · FOCS 2004 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
adiabatic quantum computation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | How Powerful is Adiabatic Quantum Computation? · FOCS 2001 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | How Powerful is Adiabatic Quantum Computation? · FOCS 2001 |
Computational complexity
communication complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Quantum Entanglement and Communication Complexity · SIAM J. Comput. 2000 |
Computational complexity
kolmogorov complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Quantum Kolmogorov Complexity · CCC 2000 |
Computational complexity › communication complexity › two-party communication
quantum communication complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Quantum Entanglement and Communication Complexity · SIAM J. Comput. 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum entanglement |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Quantum Entanglement and Communication Complexity · SIAM J. Comput. 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum gates |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Self-testing of universal and fault-tolerant sets of quantum gates · STOC 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum information theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Quantum Kolmogorov Complexity · CCC 2000 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
quantum kolmogorov complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Quantum Kolmogorov Complexity · CCC 2000 |
Computational complexity › query complexity › bounded queries
bounded query classes |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Quantum Bounded Query Complexity · CCC 1999 |
Computational complexity › query complexity › bounded queries
constant query complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Quantum Bounded Query Complexity · CCC 1999 |
Computational complexity
structural complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Quantum Bounded Query Complexity · CCC 1999 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
kullback-leibler divergence |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial method · 0.5adversary bound · 0.5program testing · 0.1spectral gap analysis · 0.1eigenvector analysis · 0.1quantum fourier transform · 0.1statistical hypothesis testing · 0.1semidirect product analysis · 0.1pretty good measurement · 0.1adiabatic simulation · 0.0query complexity argument · 0.0local search heuristic · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Polynomial InterpolationabstractWe consider the number of quantum queries required to determine the coefficients of a degree-d polynomial over GF(q). A lower bound shown independently by Kane and Kutin and by Meyer and Pommersheim shows that d/2+1/2 quantum queries are needed to solve this problem with bounded error, whereas an algorithm of Boneh and Zhandry shows that d quantum queries are sufficient. We show that the lower bound is achievable: d/2+1/2 quantum queries suffice to determine the polynomial with bounded error. Furthermore, we show that d/2+1 queries suffice to achieve probability approaching 1 for large q. These upper bounds improve results of Boneh and Zhandry on the insecurity of cryptographic protocols against quantum attacks. We also show that our algorithm's success probability as a function of the number of queries is precisely optimal. Furthermore, the algorithm can be implemented with gate complexity poly(log q) with negligible decrease in the success probability. We end with a conjecture about the quantum query complexity of multivariate polynomial interpolation. Andrew M. Childs, Wim van Dam, Shih-Han Hung, Igor E. Shparlinski |
ICALP | 2 |
| 2013 | Implausible consequences of superstrong nonlocality
Wim van Dam |
Nat. Comput. | 1 |
| 2013 | Quantum entanglement and the communication complexity of the inner product function
Richard Cleve, Wim van Dam, Michael Nielsen 0002, Alain Tapp |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2007 | Quantum algorithm for a generalized hidden shift problem
Andrew M. Childs, Wim van Dam |
SODA | 2 |
| 2007 | Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum ComputationabstractAdiabatic quantum computation has recently attracted attention in the physics and computer science communities, but its computational power was unknown. We describe an efficient adiabatic simulation of any given quantum algorithm, which implies that the adiabatic computation model and the conventional quantum computation model are polynomially equivalent. Our result can be extended to the physically realistic setting of particles arranged on a two‐dimensional grid with nearest neighbor interactions. The equivalence between the models allows stating the main open problems in quantum computation using well‐studied mathematical objects such as eigenvectors and spectral gaps of sparse matrices. Dorit Aharonov, Wim van Dam, Julia Kempe, Zeph Landau, Seth Lloyd, Oded Regev 0001 |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2007 | Self-Testing of Universal and Fault-Tolerant Sets of Quantum GatesabstractWe consider the design of self-testers for quantum gates. A self-tester for the gates $\boldsymbol{F}_1,\ldots, \boldsymbol{F}_m$ is a procedure that, given any gates $\boldsymbol{G}_1, \ldots, \boldsymbol{G}_m$, decides with high probability if each $\boldsymbol{G}_i$ is close to $\boldsymbol{F}_i$. This decision has to rely only on measuring in the computational basis the effect of iterating the gates on the classical states. It turns out that, instead of individual gates, we can design only procedures for families of gates. To achieve our goal we borrow some elegant ideas of the theory of program testing: We characterize the gate families by specific properties, develop a theory of robustness for them, and show that they lead to self-testers. In particular we prove that the universal and fault-tolerant set of gates consisting of a Hadamard gate, a $\mathrm{c\text{-}NOT}$ gate, and a phase rotation gate of angle $\pi/4$ is self-testable. Wim van Dam, Frédéric Magniez, Michele Mosca, Miklos Santha |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2006 | Quantum Algorithms for Some Hidden Shift ProblemsabstractAlmost all of the most successful quantum algorithms discovered to date exploit the ability of the Fourier transform to recover subgroup structures of functions, especially periodicity. The fact that Fourier transforms can also be used to capture shift structure has received far less attention in the context of quantum computation. In this paper, we present three examples of “unknown shift” problems that can be solved efficiently on a quantum computer using the quantum Fourier transform. For one of these problems, the shifted Legendre symbol problem, we give evidence that the problem is hard to solve classically, by showing a reduction from breaking algebraically homomorphic cryptosystems. We also define the hidden coset problem, which generalizes the hidden shift problem and the hidden subgroup problem. This framework provides a unified way of viewing the ability of the Fourier transform to capture subgroup and shift structure. Wim van Dam, Sean Hallgren, Lawrence Ip |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2005 | From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groupsabstractWe approach the hidden subgroup problem by performing the so-called pretty good measurement on hidden subgroup states. For various groups that can be expressed as the semidirect product of an abelian group and a cyclic group, we show that the pretty good measurement is optimal and that its probability of success and unitary implementation are closely related to an average-case algebraic problem. By solving this problem, we find efficient quantum algorithms for a number of nonabelian hidden subgroup problems, including some for which no efficient algorithm was previously known: certain metacyclic groups as well as all groups of the form /spl Zopf//sub p/ /sup r/ /spl times/ /spl Zopf//sub p/ fixed r (including the Heisenberg group, r = 2). In particular our results show that entangled measurements across multiple copies of hidden subgroup states can be useful for efficiently solving the nonabelian HSP. Dave Bacon, Andrew M. Childs, Wim van Dam |
FOCS | 3 |
| 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofsabstractThere exist numerous proofs of Bell's theorem, stating that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local realistic theories of nature. Here the strength of such nonlocality proofs is defined in terms of the amount of evidence against local realism provided by the corresponding experiments. Statistical considerations show that the amount of evidence should be measured by the Kullback-Leibler (KL) or relative entropy divergence. The statistical strength of the following proofs is determined: Bell's original proof and Peres' optimized variant of it, and proofs by Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH), Hardy, Mermin, and Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (GHZ). The GHZ proof is at least four and a half times stronger than all other proofs, while of the two-party proofs, the one of CHSH is the strongest. Wim van Dam, Richard D. Gill, Peter Grünwald |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2004 | Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum ComputationabstractThe model of adiabatic quantum computation has recently attracted attention in the physics and computer science communities, but its exact computational power has been unknown. We settle this question and describe an efficient adiabatic simulation of any given quantum algorithm. This implies that the adiabatic computation model and the standard quantum circuit model are polynomially equivalent. We also describe an extension of this result with implications to physical implementations of adiabatic computation. We believe that our result highlights the potential importance of the adiabatic computation model in the design of quantum algorithms and in their experimental realization. Dorit Aharonov, Wim van Dam, Julia Kempe, Zeph Landau, Seth Lloyd, Oded Regev 0001 |
FOCS | 2 |
| 2003 | Quantum algorithms for some hidden shift problems
Wim van Dam, Sean Hallgren, Lawrence Ip |
SODA | 1 |
| 2002 | Quantum Algorithms for Weighing Matrices and Quadratic Residues
Wim van Dam |
Algorithmica | 1 |
| 2001 | How Powerful is Adiabatic Quantum Computation?abstractThe authors analyze the computational power and limitations of the recently proposed 'quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm'. Adiabatic quantum computation is a novel paradigm for the design of quantum algorithms; it is truly quantum in the sense that it can be used to speed up searching by a quadratic factor over any classical algorithm. On the question of whether this new paradigm may be used to efficiently solve NP-complete problems on a quantum computer, we show that the usual query complexity arguments cannot be used to rule out a polynomial time solution. On the other hand, we argue that the adiabatic approach may be thought of as a kind of 'quantum local search'. We design a family of minimization problems that is hard for such local search heuristics, and establish an exponential lower bound for the adiabatic algorithm for these problems. This provides insights into the limitations of this approach. It remains an open question whether adiabatic quantum computation can establish an exponential speed-up over traditional computing or if there exists a classical algorithm that can simulate the quantum adiabatic process efficiently. Wim van Dam, Michele Mosca, Umesh V. Vazirani |
FOCS | 1 |
| 2001 | Quantum Kolmogorov Complexity
André Berthiaume, Wim van Dam, Sophie Laplante |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 2 |
| 2000 | Quantum Kolmogorov ComplexityabstractIn this paper we give a definition for quantum Kolmogorov complexity. In the classical setting, the Kolmogorov complexity of a string is the length of the shortest program that can produce this string as its output. It is a measure of the amount of innate randomness (or information) contained in the string. We define the quantum Kolmogorov complexity of a qubit string as the length of the shortest quantum input to a universal quantum Turing machine that produces the initial qubit string with high fidelity. The definition of P. Vitanyi (2000) measures the amount of classical information, whereas we consider the amount of quantum information in a qubit string. We argue that our definition is natural and is an accurate representation of the amount of quantum information contained in a quantum state. André Berthiaume, Wim van Dam, Sophie Laplante |
CCC | 2 |
| 2000 | Self-testing of universal and fault-tolerant sets of quantum gatesabstractAbstract. We consider the design of self-testers for quantum gates. A self-tester for the gates F 1,..., F m is a procedure that, given any gates G1,..., Gm, decides with high probability if each Gi is close to F i. This decision has to rely only on measuring in the computational basis the effect of iterating the gates on the classical states. It turns out that instead of individual gates, we can only design procedures for families of gates. To achieve our goal we borrow some elegant ideas of the theory of program testing: we characterize the gate families by specific properties, we develop a theory of robustness for them, and show that they lead to self-testers. In particular we prove that the universal and fault-tolerant set of gates consisting of a Hadamard gate, a c-NOT gate, and a phase rotation gate of angle π/4 is self-testable. 1. Introduction. In Wim van Dam, Frédéric Magniez, Michele Mosca, Miklos Santha |
STOC | 1 |
| 2000 | Quantum Entanglement and Communication ComplexityabstractWe consider a variation of the communication complexity scenario, where the parties are supplied with an extra resource: particles in an entangled quantum state. We note that "quantum nonlocality" can be naturally expressed in the language of communication complexity. These are communication complexity problems where the "output" is embodied in the correlations between the outputs of the individual parties. Without entanglement, the parties must communicate to produce the required correlations; whereas, with entanglement, no communication is necessary to produce the correlations. In this sense, nonlocality proofs can also be viewed as communication complexity problems where the presence of quantum entanglement reduces the amount of necessary communication. We show how to transform examples of nonlocality into more traditional communication complexity problems, where the output is explicitly determined by each individual party. The resulting problems require communication with or without entanglement, but the required communication is less when entanglement is available. All these results are a noteworthy contrast to the well-known fact that entanglement cannot be used to actually simulate or compress classical communication between remote parties. Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, Wim van Dam |
SIAM J. Comput. | 3 |
| 1999 | Quantum Bounded Query ComplexityabstractWe combine the classical notions and techniques for bounded query classes with those developed in quantum computing. We give strong evidence that quantum queries to an oracle in the class NP does indeed reduce the query, complexity of decision problems. Under traditional complexity assumptions, we obtain an exponential speedup between the quantum and the classical query complexity of function classes. For decision problems and function classes we obtain the following results: P/sub /spl par///sup NP[2k]//spl sube/EQP/sub /spl par///sup NP[k]/; P/sub /spl par///sup NP[2k+1-2]//spl sube/EQP/sup NP[k]/; FP/sub /spl par///sup NP[2k=1-2]//spl sube/FEQP/sup NP[2k]/; FP/sub /spl par///sup NP/spl sube/FEQP(NP[Olog n)]/. For sets A that are many-one complete for PSPACE or EXP we show that Fp/sup A//spl sube/FEQP/sup A[1]/. Sets A that are many-one complete for PP have the property that FP/sub /spl par///sup A//spl sube/FEQP/sup A[1]/. In general we prove that for any set A there is a set X such that FP/sup A//spl sube/FEQP/sup X[1]/, establishing that no set is superterse in the quantum setting. Harry Buhrman, Wim van Dam |
CCC | 2 |
| 1998 | Quantum Oracle Interrogation: Getting All Information for Almost Half the PriceabstractConsider a quantum computer in combination with a binary oracle of domain size N. It is shown how N/2+/spl radic/N calls to the oracle are sufficient to guess the whole content of the oracle (being an N bit string) with probability greater than 95%. This contrasts the power of classical computers which would require N calls to achieve the same task. From this result it follows that any function with the N bits of the oracle as input can be calculated using N/2+/spl radic/N queries if we allow a small probability of error. It is also shown that this error probability can be made arbitrary small by using N/2+O(/spl radic/N) oracle queries. In the second part of the article 'approximate interrogation' is considered. This is when only a certain fraction of the N oracle bits are requested. Also for this scenario does the quantum algorithm outperform the classical protocols. An example is given where a quantum procedure with N/10 queries returns a string of which 80% of the bits are correct. Any classical protocol would need 6N/10 queries to establish such a correctness ratio. Wim van Dam |
FOCS | 1 |