VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Udi Apsel
dblp:70/10620
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 68% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 10% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014 Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming relaxation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014 |
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
sherali-adams hierarchy |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
first-order probabilistic models |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › directed graphical model
influence diagrams |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
weighted model counting |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear programming relaxation · 0.4cluster signature graph · 0.4automorphism group · 0.4weighted model counting · 0.1propositionalization · 0.1first-order variable elimination · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster SignaturesabstractInference in large scale graphical models is an important task in many domains, and in particular probabilistic relational models (e.g. Markov logic networks). Such models often exhibit considerable symmetry, and it is a challenge to devise algorithms that exploit this symmetry to speed up inference. Recently, the automorphism group has been proposed to formalize mathematically what "exploiting symmetry" means. However, obtaining symmetry derived from automorphism is GI-hard, and consequently only a small fraction of the symmetry is easily available for effective employment. In this paper, we improve upon efficiency in two ways. First, we introduce the Cluster Signature Graph (CSG), a platform on which greater portions of the symmetries can be revealed and exploited. CSGs classify clusters of variables by projecting relations between cluster members onto a graph, allowing for the efficient pruning of symmetrical clusters even before their generation. Second, we introduce a novel framework based on CSGs for the Sherali-Adams hierarchy of linear program (LP) relaxations, dedicated to exploiting this symmetry for the benefit of tight Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) approximations. Combined with the pruning power of CSG, the framework quickly generates compact formulations for otherwise intractable LPs, as demonstrated by several empirical results. Udi Apsel, Kristian Kersting, Martin Mladenov |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2012 | Lifted MEU by Weighted Model CountingabstractRecent work in the field of probabilistic inference demonstrated the efficiency of weighted model counting (WMC) enginesfor exact inference in propositional and, very recently, first order models. To date, these methods have not been applied to decision making models, propositional or first order, such as influence diagrams, and Markov decision networks (MDN). In this paper we show how this technique can be applied to such models. First, we show how WMC can be used to solve (propositional) MDNs. Then, we show how this can be extended to handle a first-order model — the Markov Logic Decision Network (MLDN). WMC offers two central benefits: it is a very simple and very efficient technique. This is particularly true for the first-order case, where the WMC approach is simpler conceptually, and, in many cases, more effective computationally than the existing methods for solving MLDNs via first-order variable elimination, or via propositionalization. We demonstrate the above empirically. Udi Apsel, Ronen I. Brafman |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2012 | Exploiting Uniform Assignments in First-Order MPE
Udi Apsel, Ronen I. Brafman |
UAI | 1 |
| 2011 | Extended Lifted Inference with Joint Formulas
Udi Apsel, Ronen I. Brafman |
UAI | 1 |