Udi Apsel

dblp:70/10620 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 68% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 10%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference
0.322014
Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014
Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference
0.212014
Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks
0.212014
Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model
0.212014
Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014
Mathematical optimization
linear programming relaxation
0.212014
Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
sherali-adams hierarchy
0.212014
Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty
0.112012
Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
first-order probabilistic models
0.112012
Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › directed graphical model
influence diagrams
0.112012
Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
weighted model counting
0.112012
Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting · AAAI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming relaxation · 0.4cluster signature graph · 0.4automorphism group · 0.4weighted model counting · 0.1propositionalization · 0.1first-order variable elimination · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Lifting Relational MAP-LPs Using Cluster Signatures
abstract
Inference in large scale graphical models is an important task in many domains, and in particular probabilistic relational models (e.g. Markov logic networks). Such models often exhibit considerable symmetry, and it is a challenge to devise algorithms that exploit this symmetry to speed up inference. Recently, the automorphism group has been proposed to formalize mathematically what "exploiting symmetry" means. However, obtaining symmetry derived from automorphism is GI-hard, and consequently only a small fraction of the symmetry is easily available for effective employment. In this paper, we improve upon efficiency in two ways. First, we introduce the Cluster Signature Graph (CSG), a platform on which greater portions of the symmetries can be revealed and exploited. CSGs classify clusters of variables by projecting relations between cluster members onto a graph, allowing for the efficient pruning of symmetrical clusters even before their generation. Second, we introduce a novel framework based on CSGs for the Sherali-Adams hierarchy of linear program (LP) relaxations, dedicated to exploiting this symmetry for the benefit of tight Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) approximations. Combined with the pruning power of CSG, the framework quickly generates compact formulations for otherwise intractable LPs, as demonstrated by several empirical results.
Udi Apsel, Kristian Kersting, Martin Mladenov
AAAI1
2012 Lifted MEU by Weighted Model Counting
abstract
Recent work in the field of probabilistic inference demonstrated the efficiency of weighted model counting (WMC) enginesfor exact inference in propositional and, very recently, first order models. To date, these methods have not been applied to decision making models, propositional or first order, such as influence diagrams, and Markov decision networks (MDN). In this paper we show how this technique can be applied to such models. First, we show how WMC can be used to solve (propositional) MDNs. Then, we show how this can be extended to handle a first-order model — the Markov Logic Decision Network (MLDN). WMC offers two central benefits: it is a very simple and very efficient technique. This is particularly true for the first-order case, where the WMC approach is simpler conceptually, and, in many cases, more effective computationally than the existing methods for solving MLDNs via first-order variable elimination, or via propositionalization. We demonstrate the above empirically.
Udi Apsel, Ronen I. Brafman
AAAI1
2012 Exploiting Uniform Assignments in First-Order MPE
Udi Apsel, Ronen I. Brafman
UAI1
2011 Extended Lifted Inference with Joint Formulas
Udi Apsel, Ronen I. Brafman
UAI1