Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Todd A. Cass

dblp:70/143 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 5 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
3D vision · 63% Image recognition and object detection · 36% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 1%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 67% Image and video processing · 33%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.031998
Robust Affine Structure Matching for 3D Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Polynomial-Time Geometric Matching for Object Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1997
Polynomial-Time Object Recognition in the Presence of Clutter, Occlusion, and Uncertainty · ECCV 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision
model-based object localization
0.011998
Robust Affine Structure Matching for 3D Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching
geometric matching
0.011997
Polynomial-Time Geometric Matching for Object Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object recognition
0.011996
Robust Affine Structure Matching for 3D Object Recognition · ECCV (1) 1996
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching
0.011996
Robust Affine Structure Matching for 3D Object Recognition · ECCV (1) 1996
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
model-based object recognition
0.021992
Measuring the Quality of Hypotheses in Model-Based Recognition · ECCV 1992
A robust parallel implementation of 2D model-based recognition · CVPR 1988
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.011994
Geometric Methods for Relative Reconstruction from Weakly Calibrated Images · ICRA 1994
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
projective reconstruction
0.011994
Geometric Methods for Relative Reconstruction from Weakly Calibrated Images · ICRA 1994
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › multi-view stereo
stereo reconstruction
0.011994
Geometric Methods for Relative Reconstruction from Weakly Calibrated Images · ICRA 1994
Image and video processing › motion analysis
motion reconstruction
0.011994
Analytical Methods for Uncalibrated Stereo and Motion Reconstruction · ECCV (1) 1994
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d reconstruction › multi-view reconstruction
stereo reconstruction
0.011994
Analytical Methods for Uncalibrated Stereo and Motion Reconstruction · ECCV (1) 1994
Algorithms and data structures
polynomial-time algorithms
0.011992
Polynomial-Time Object Recognition in the Presence of Clutter, Occlusion, and Uncertainty · ECCV 1992
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching
0.011990
Feature matching for object localization in the presence of uncertainty · ICCV 1990
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization
0.011990
Feature matching for object localization in the presence of uncertainty · ICCV 1990
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms
0.011989
Algorithmic Techniques for Computer Vision on a Fine-Grained Parallel Machine · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration
0.011994
Geometric Methods for Relative Reconstruction from Weakly Calibrated Images · ICRA 1994
Image and video processing
low-level vision
0.011989
Algorithmic Techniques for Computer Vision on a Fine-Grained Parallel Machine · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Parallel and multicore computing › data parallelism
SIMD vectorization
0.011988
A robust parallel implementation of 2D model-based recognition · CVPR 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial-time algorithm · 0.0affine structure matching · 0.0transformation space search · 0.0geometric constraint analysis · 0.0vector machine model · 0.0scan primitives · 0.0pointer jumping · 0.0point correspondence · 0.0epipolar geometry · 0.0analytical methods · 0.0transformation sampling · 0.0contour matching · 0.0model-based recognition · 0.0geometric uncertainty modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Robust Affine Structure Matching for 3D Object Recognition
abstract
We consider model-based object localization based on local geometric feature matching between the model and the image data. The method is based on geometric constraint analysis, working in transformation space. We present a formal method which guarantees finding all feasible matchings in polynomial time. From there we develop more computationally feasible algorithms based on conservative approximations of the formal method. Additionally, our formalism relates object localization, affine model indexing, and structure from multiple views to one another.
Todd A. Cass
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1997 Polynomial-Time Geometric Matching for Object Recognition
Todd A. Cass
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
1996 Robust Affine Structure Matching for 3D Object Recognition
Todd A. Cass
ECCV (1)1
1994 Analytical Methods for Uncalibrated Stereo and Motion Reconstruction
Jean Ponce, David H. Marimont, Todd A. Cass
ECCV (1)3
1994 Robust geometric matching for 3D object recognition
abstract
This paper considers a model-based approach to identifying and locating known 3D objects in 2D images of a scene containing them via geometric feature matching of model and image data represented in terms of local geometric features. The problems of finding feature correspondences in the presence of geometric uncertainty, missing, and spurious data features are explicitly handled. The fundamentally geometric and combinatorial elements of the feature matching problem are made explicit, and a formulation based on computational geometry is used to achieve a polynomial-time matching approach for which the author can guarantee completeness and correctness. This paper deals primarily with the case of planar objects undergoing full 3D motion and scaled-orthographic projection.
Todd A. Cass
ICPR (1)1
1994 Geometric Methods for Relative Reconstruction from Weakly Calibrated Images
abstract
We present several new geometric methods for relative stereo and motion reconstruction using a discrete set of point correspondences. We suppose that the epipoles are known but do not assume any knowledge of the cameras' intrinsic or extrinsic parameters. In each case, we choose a set of five points as a basis for projective space and perform reconstruction relative to these five points. We also present a new technique for reprojection without reconstruction. We have implemented the proposed methods and present several examples using real images.>
Jean Ponce, David H. Marimont, Todd A. Cass
ICRA3
1992 Polynomial-Time Object Recognition in the Presence of Clutter, Occlusion, and Uncertainty
Todd A. Cass
ECCV1
1992 Measuring the Quality of Hypotheses in Model-Based Recognition
Daniel P. Huttenlocher, Todd A. Cass
ECCV2
1990 Feature matching for object localization in the presence of uncertainty
abstract
The author focuses on the central problem of image and model feature matching. In particular he defines a model of the geometrical uncertainty of image features, and devises a tractable algorithm for determining all feasible sets of feature correspondences given the uncertainty tolerances. A key insight into the matching problem provided by this work is that the search for a matching should be guided by analysis of (feasible) transformation space rather than the space of feature correspondences. This is because the author is only interested in maximal feasible match-sets and not the exponentially many subsets of them as found by correspondence space search.>
Todd A. Cass
ICCV1
1989 Algorithmic Techniques for Computer Vision on a Fine-Grained Parallel Machine
abstract
The authors describe several fundamentally useful primitive operations and routines and illustrate their usefulness in a wide range of familiar version processes. These operations are described in terms of a vector machine model of parallel computation. They use a parallel vector model because vector models can be mapped onto a wide range of architectures. They also describe implementing these primitives on a particular fine-grained machine, the connection machine. It is found that these primitives are applicable in a variety of vision tasks. Grid permutations are useful in many early vision algorithms, such as Gaussian convolution, edge detection, motion, and stereo computation. Scan primitives facilitate simple, efficient solutions of many problems in middle- and high-level vision. Pointer jumping, using permutation operations, permits construction of extended image structures in logarithmic time. Methods such as outer products, which rely on a variety of primitives, play an important role of many high-level algorithms.>
James J. Little, Guy E. Blelloch, Todd A. Cass
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
1988 A robust parallel implementation of 2D model-based recognition
abstract
An approach to 2D model-based object recognition is developed, suitable for implementation on a highly parallel SIMD (single-instruction, multiple data stream) computer. Object models and image data are represented as contour features. Transformation sampling is used to determine the optimal model-feature-to-image-feature transformation by sampling the space of possible transformations. Only a small part of this space need actually be sampled due to the constraints placed on transformations by individual matches of image features to model features. The procedure requires O(Kmn) processors and O(log/sup 2/ (Kmn)) time, where m is the number of model features, n is the number of image features, and K depends on the size of the image. The procedure works well and is extremely robust in the presence of occlusion. An implementation of the procedure on the Connection Machine is described, and some experimental results given.>
Todd A. Cass
CVPR1