Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oukseh Lee

dblp:70/4196 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 8 · 6 first-authorTheory of computation · 4 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Program analysis · 59% Program verification · 23% Programming languages and type systems · 18%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › static analysis › pointer analysis
shape analysis
0.222011
Program Analysis for Overlaid Data Structures · CAV 2011
Scalable Shape Analysis for Systems Code · CAV 2008
Program verification › system verification
systems code verification
0.112008
Scalable Shape Analysis for Systems Code · CAV 2008
Programming languages and type systems
type checking
0.011998
Proofs about a Folklore Let-Polymorphic Type Inference Algorithm · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1998
Programming languages and type systems
type inference
0.011998
Proofs about a Folklore Let-Polymorphic Type Inference Algorithm · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1998
Programming languages and type systems
type systems
0.011998
Proofs about a Folklore Let-Polymorphic Type Inference Algorithm · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

abstract interpretation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 A divide-and-conquer approach for analysing overlaid data structures
Oukseh Lee, Hongseok Yang, Rasmus Petersen
Formal Methods Syst. Des.1
2011 Program Analysis for Overlaid Data Structures
Oukseh Lee, Hongseok Yang, Rasmus Petersen
CAV1
2008 Scalable Shape Analysis for Systems Code
Hongseok Yang, Oukseh Lee, Josh Berdine, Cristiano Calcagno, Byron Cook, Dino Distefano, Peter W. O'Hearn
CAV2
2006 A Practical String Analyzer by the Widening Approach
Tae-Hyoung Choi, Oukseh Lee, Hyunha Kim, Kyung-Goo Doh
APLAS2
2005 Automatic Verification of Pointer Programs Using Grammar-Based Shape Analysis
Oukseh Lee, Hongseok Yang, Kwangkeun Yi
ESOP1
2005 Static insertion of safe and effective memory reuse commands into ML-like programs
Oukseh Lee, Hongseok Yang, Kwangkeun Yi
Sci. Comput. Program.1
2004 Experiments on the effectiveness of an automatic insertion of memory reuses into ML-like programs
abstract
We present extensive experimental results on our static analysis and source-level transformation [12, 11] that adds explicit memory-reuse commands into ML program text.
Oukseh Lee, Kwangkeun Yi
ISMM1
2003 Inserting Safe Memory Reuse Commands into ML-Like Programs
Oukseh Lee, Hongseok Yang, Kwangkeun Yi
SAS1
2002 A proof method for the correctness of modularized 0CFA
Oukseh Lee, Kwangkeun Yi, Yunheung Paek
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1998 Proofs about a Folklore Let-Polymorphic Type Inference Algorithm
abstract
The Hindley/Milner let-polymorphic type inference system has two different algorithms: one is the de facto standard Algorithm 𝒲 that is bottom-up (or context-insensitive), and the other is a “folklore” algorithm that is top-down (or context-sensitive). Because the latter algorithm has not been formally presented with its soundness and completeness proofs, and its relation with the 𝒲 algorithm has not been rigorously investigated, its use in place of (or in combination with) 𝒲 is not well founded. In this article, we formally define the context-sensitive, top-down type inference algorithm (named “M”), prove its soundness and completeness, and show a distinguishing property that M always stops earlier than 𝒲 if the input program is ill typed. Our proofs can be seen as theoretical justifications for various type-checking strategies being used in practice.
Oukseh Lee, Kwangkeun Yi
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.1