Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Virginia Wheway

dblp:70/5460 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
boosting
0.012001
Using Boosting to Simplify Classification Models · ICDM 2001
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.012001
Using Boosting to Simplify Classification Models · ICDM 2001
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.012001
Using Boosting to Simplify Classification Models · ICDM 2001
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
interpretable classification
0.012001
Using Boosting to Simplify Classification Models · ICDM 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sub-context partitioning · 0.0edge and margin analysis · 0.0boosting · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Using Boosting to Simplify Classification Models
abstract
Ensemble classification techniques such as bagging, boosting and arcing algorithms have been shown to lead to reduced classification errors on unseen cases and seem immune to the problem of overfitting. Several explanations for the reduction in generalisation error have been presented, with recent authors defining and applying diagnostics such as "edge" and "margin". These measures provide insight into the behaviour of ensemble classifiers, but can they be exploited further? In this paper, a four-stage classification procedure in introduced, which is based on an extension of edge and margin analysis. This new procedure allows inverse sub-contexts and difficult border regions to be detected using properties of the edge distribution. It is widely known that ensemble classifiers 'balance' the margin as the number of iterations increases. However, by exploiting this balancing property and flagging observations whose edges (and margins) are not 'balanced', data sets can often be partitioned into sub contexts and the classification can be made more robust as confounding within a data set is removed. In the majority of cases, the sub-contexts detected are inverse to each other or, quite possibly, the smaller sub-context contains mis-labelled observations. The majority of classification techniques have not been adapted to detect contexts within a data set, and the generalisation error reported in studies to date is based on the entire data set and can be improved by partitioning the data set in question. The aim of this study is to move towards interpretability, and it is shown that, by training on a sub-set of the original training data, we gain simplicity of models and reduced generalisation error.
Virginia Wheway
ICDM1