Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthias Radestock

dblp:70/6198 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
object-oriented language design
0.011994
Towards a Minimal Object-Oriented Language for Distributed and Concurrent Programming · PODC 1994
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Coordinating components in middleware systems
abstract
Abstract Configuration and coordination are central issues in the design and implementation of middleware systems and are one of the reasons why building such systems is more complex than constructing stand‐alone sequential programs. Through configuration, the structure of the system is established—which elements it contains, where they are located and how they are interconnected. Coordination is concerned with the interaction of the various components—when an interaction takes place, which parties are involved, what protocols are followed. Its purpose is to coordinate the behaviour of the various components to meet the overall system specification. The open and adaptive nature of middleware systems makes the task of configuration and coordination particularly challenging. We propose a model that can operate in such an environment and enables the dynamic integration and coordination of components by observing and coercing their behaviour through the interception of the messages exchanged between them. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Matthias Radestock, Susan Eisenbach
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.1
1996 Semantics of a Higher-Order Coordination Language
Matthias Radestock, Susan Eisenbach
COORDINATION1
1994 Towards a Minimal Object-Oriented Language for Distributed and Concurrent Programming
abstract
No abstract available.
Matthias Radestock, Susan Eisenbach
PODC1