Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Hannes Schabauer

dblp:70/6790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular evolution
0.212014
Optimization strategies for fast detection of positive selection on phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.212014
Optimization strategies for fast detection of positive selection on phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics › selection detection
positive selection detection
0.212014
Optimization strategies for fast detection of positive selection on phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2014
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
parallel optimization
0.212014
Optimization strategies for fast detection of positive selection on phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2014
High-performance computing
scientific computing
0.212014
Optimization strategies for fast detection of positive selection on phylogenetic trees · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallelization · 0.4likelihood estimation · 0.4distributed computing · 0.4branch-site model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Optimization strategies for fast detection of positive selection on phylogenetic trees
abstract
MOTIVATION: The detection of positive selection is widely used to study gene and genome evolution, but its application remains limited by the high computational cost of existing implementations. We present a series of computational optimizations for more efficient estimation of the likelihood function on large-scale phylogenetic problems. We illustrate our approach using the branch-site model of codon evolution. RESULTS: We introduce novel optimization techniques that substantially outperform both CodeML from the PAML package and our previously optimized sequential version SlimCodeML. These techniques can also be applied to other likelihood-based phylogeny software. Our implementation scales well for large numbers of codons and/or species. It can therefore analyse substantially larger datasets than CodeML. We evaluated FastCodeML on different platforms and measured average sequential speedups of FastCodeML (single-threaded) versus CodeML of up to 5.8, average speedups of FastCodeML (multi-threaded) versus CodeML on a single node (shared memory) of up to 36.9 for 12 CPU cores, and average speedups of the distributed FastCodeML versus CodeML of up to 170.9 on eight nodes (96 CPU cores in total). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ftp://ftp.vital-it.ch/tools/FastCodeML/ CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected].
Mario Valle, Hannes Schabauer, Christoph Pacher, Heinz Stockinger, Alexandros Stamatakis, Marc Robinson-Rechavi, Nicolas Salamin
Bioinform.2
2005 Solving Very Large Traveling Salesman Problems by SOM Parallelization on Cluster Architectures
abstract
This paper describes how to solve very large Traveling- Salesman Problems heuristically by the parallelization of self-organizing maps on cluster architectures. The used way of parallelizing is a sophisticated Structural Data Parallel approach based on the SPMD model. We distinguish between a non-sophisticated and a sophisticated approach for efficient and simple parallelization of the SOMs.
Hannes Schabauer, Erich Schikuta, Thomas Weishäupl
PDCAT1