Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Nadav Steindler

dblp:70/9656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test coverage
code coverage		 0.112011
Code coverage analysis in practice for large systems · ICSE 2011
Software testing › test coverage
coverage analysis		 0.112011
Code coverage analysis in practice for large systems · ICSE 2011
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Code coverage analysis in practice for large systems
abstract
Large systems generate immense quantities of code coverage data. A user faced with the task of analyzing this data, for example, to decide on test areas to improve, faces a 'needle in a haystack' problem.
Yoram Adler, Noam Behar, Orna Raz, Onn Shehory, Nadav Steindler, Shmuel Ur, Aviad Zlotnick
 ICSE5