Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Utkarsh Ayachit
dblp:70/9927
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 87% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructures · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › scientific visualization
in situ visualization and analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructures · SC 2016 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Towards elastic in situ analysis for high-performance computing simulations
Matthieu Dorier, Zhe Wang 0059, Srinivasan Ramesh, Utkarsh Ayachit, Shane Snyder, Robert B. Ross, Manish Parashar |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 4 |
| 2022 | Colza: Enabling Elastic In Situ Visualization for High-performance Computing SimulationsabstractIn situ analysis and visualization have grown increasingly popular for enabling direct access to data from high-performance computing (HPC) simulations. As a simulation progresses and interesting physical phenomena emerge, however, the data produced may become increasingly complex, and users may need to dynamically change the type and scale of in situ analysis tasks being carried out and consequently adapt the amount of resources allocated to such tasks. To date, none of the production in situ analysis frameworks offer such an elasticity feature, and for good reason: the assumption that the number of processes could vary during run time would force developers to rethink software and algorithms at every level of the in situ analysis stack. In this paper we present Colza, a data staging service with elastic in situ visualization capabilities. Colza relies on the widely used ParaView Catalyst in situ visualization framework and enables elasticity by replacing MPI with a custom collective communication library based on the Mochi suite of libraries. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to enable elastic in situ visualization capabilities for HPC applications on top of existing production analysis tools. Matthieu Dorier, Zhe Wang 0059, Utkarsh Ayachit, Shane Snyder, Robert B. Ross, Manish Parashar |
IPDPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructuresabstractA key trend facing extreme-scale computational science is the widening gap between computational and I/O rates, and the challenge that follows is how to best gain insight from simulation data when it is increasingly impractical to save it to persistent storage for subsequent visual exploration and analysis. One approach to this challenge is centered around the idea of in situ processing, where visualization and analysis processing is performed while data is still resident in memory. This paper examines several key design and performance issues related to the idea of in situ processing at extreme scale on modern platforms: scalability, overhead, performance measurement and analysis, comparison and contrast with a traditional post hoc approach, and interfacing with simulation codes. We illustrate these principles in practice with studies, conducted on large-scale HPC platforms, that include a miniapplication and multiple science application codes, one of which demonstrates in situ methods in use at greater than 1M-way concurrency. Utkarsh Ayachit, Andrew C. Bauer, Earl P. N. Duque, Greg Eisenhauer, Nicola J. Ferrier, Junmin Gu, Kenneth E. Jansen, Burlen Loring, Zarija Lukic, Suresh Menon, Dmitriy Morozov, Patrick O'Leary, Reetesh Ranjan, Michel E. Rasquin, Christopher P. Stone, Venkatram Vishwanath, Gunther H. Weber, Brad Whitlock, Matthew Wolf, Kesheng Wu, E. Wes Bethel |
SC | 1 |