VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Börschinger
dblp:71/10489
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 59% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% Language models and text generation · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 84% Data mining · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering evaluation |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluation · EMNLP 2022 What Question Answering can Learn from Trivia Nerds · ACL 2020 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluation · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering datasets |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | What Question Answering can Learn from Trivia Nerds · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Computationally Efficient Algorithm for Learning Topical Collocation Models · ACL (1) 2015 |
Data mining
probabilistic model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Computationally Efficient Algorithm for Learning Topical Collocation Models · ACL (1) 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A joint model of word segmentation and phonological variation for English word-final /t/-deletion · ACL (1) 2013 |
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Reducing Grounded Learning Tasks To Grammatical Inference · EMNLP 2011 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
grounded language learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Reducing Grounded Learning Tasks To Grammatical Inference · EMNLP 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
human annotation · 1.1BERT matching · 1.1variational inference · 0.4gibbs sampling · 0.4grammatical inference · 0.2joint modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering EvaluationabstractThe predictions of question answering (QA) systems are typically evaluated against manually annotated finite sets of one or more answers.This leads to a coverage limitation that results in underestimating the true performance of systems, and is typically addressed by extending over exact match (EM) with predefined rules or with the token-level F 1 measure.In this paper, we present the first systematic conceptual and data-driven analysis to examine the shortcomings of token-level equivalence measures.To this end, we define the asymmetric notion of answer equivalence (AE), accepting answers that are equivalent to or improve over the reference, and publish over 23k human judgments for candidates produced by multiple QA systems on SQuAD. 1 Through a careful analysis of this data, we reveal and quantify several concrete limitations of the F 1 measure, such as a false impression of graduality, or missing dependence on the question.Since collecting AE annotations for each evaluated model is expensive, we learn a BERT matching (BEM) measure to approximate this task.Being a simpler task than QA, we find BEM to provide significantly better AE approximations than F 1 , and to more accurately reflect the performance of systems.Finally, we demonstrate the practical utility of AE and BEM on the concrete application of minimal accurate prediction sets, reducing the number of required answers by up to ×2.6. Jannis Bulian, Christian Buck, Wojciech Gajewski, Benjamin Börschinger, Tal Schuster |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2021 | Fool Me Twice: Entailment from Wikipedia GamificationabstractJulian Eisenschlos, Bhuwan Dhingra, Jannis Bulian, Benjamin Börschinger, Jordan Boyd-Graber. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Bhuwan Dhingra, Jannis Bulian, Benjamin Börschinger, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber |
NAACL-HLT | 4 |
| 2020 | What Question Answering can Learn from Trivia NerdsabstractQuestion answering (QA)is not just building systems; this NLP subfield also creates and curates challenging question datasets that reveal the best systems.We argue that QA datasets-and QA leaderboards-closely resemble trivia tournaments: the questions agents-humans or machines-answer reveals a "winner".However, the research community has ignored the lessons from decades of the trivia community creating vibrant, fair, and effective QA competitions.After detailing problems with existing QA datasets, we outline several lessons that transfer to QA research: removing ambiguity, identifying better QA agents, and adjudicating disputes. Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, Benjamin Börschinger |
ACL | 2 |
| 2015 | A Computationally Efficient Algorithm for Learning Topical Collocation ModelsabstractZhendong Zhao, Lan Du, Benjamin Börschinger, John K Pate, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Mark Steedman, Mark Johnson. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015. Zhendong Zhao, Lan Du 0002, Benjamin Börschinger, John K. Pate, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Mark Steedman, Mark Johnson 0001 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2014 | Unsupervised Word Segmentation in Context
Gabriel Synnaeve, Isabelle Dautriche, Benjamin Börschinger, Mark Johnson 0001, Emmanuel Dupoux |
COLING | 3 |
| 2014 | Exploring the Role of Stress in Bayesian Word Segmentation using Adaptor GrammarsabstractStress has long been established as a major cue in word segmentation for English infants. We show that enabling a current state-of-the-art Bayesian word segmentation model to take advantage of stress cues noticeably improves its performance. We find that the improvements range from 10 to 4%, depending on both the use of phonotactic cues and, to a lesser extent, the amount of evidence available to the learner. We also find that in particular early on, stress cues are much more useful for our model than phonotactic cues by themselves, consistent with the finding that children do seem to use stress cues before they use phonotactic cues. Finally, we study how the model’s knowledge about stress patterns evolves over time. We not only find that our model correctly acquires the most frequent patterns relatively quickly but also that the Unique Stress Constraint that is at the heart of a previously proposed model does not need to be built in but can be acquired jointly with word segmentation. Benjamin Börschinger, Mark Johnson 0001 |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2013 | A joint model of word segmentation and phonological variation for English word-final /t/-deletion
Benjamin Börschinger, Mark Johnson 0001, Katherine Demuth |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2013 | A summary of the 2012 JHU CLSP workshop on zero resource speech technologies and models of early language acquisitionabstractWe summarize the accomplishments of a multi-disciplinary workshop exploring the computational and scientific issues surrounding zero resource (unsupervised) speech technologies and related models of early language acquisition. Centered around the tasks of phonetic and lexical discovery, we consider unified evaluation metrics, present two new approaches for improving speaker independence in the absence of supervision, and evaluate the application of Bayesian word segmentation algorithms to automatic subword unit tokenizations. Finally, we present two strategies for integrating zero resource techniques into supervised settings, demonstrating the potential of unsupervised methods to improve mainstream technologies. Aren Jansen, Emmanuel Dupoux, Sharon Goldwater, Mark Johnson 0001, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Kenneth Church 0001, Naomi Feldman, Hynek Hermansky, Florian Metze, Richard C. Rose, Mike Seltzer, Pascal Clark, Ian McGraw, Balakrishnan Varadarajan, Erin D. Bennett, Benjamin Börschinger, Justin T. Chiu, Ewan Dunbar, Abdellah Fourtassi, David F. Harwath, Chia-ying Lee, Keith D. Levin, Atta Norouzian, Vijayaditya Peddinti, Rachael Richardson, Thomas Schatz, Samuel Thomas 0001 |
ICASSP | 16 |
| 2012 | Modeling online word segmentation performance in structured artificial languages
Stephan C. Meylan, Chigusa Kurumada, Mike Frank, Benjamin Börschinger, Mark Johnson 0001 |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2012 | Studying the Effect of Input Size for Bayesian Word Segmentation on the Providence Corpus
Benjamin Börschinger, Katherine Demuth, Mark Johnson 0001 |
COLING | 1 |
| 2011 | Reducing Grounded Learning Tasks To Grammatical Inference
Benjamin Börschinger, Bevan K. Jones, Mark Johnson 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | WikiNet: A Very Large Scale Multi-Lingual Concept Network
Vivi Nastase, Michael Strube 0001, Benjamin Börschinger, Cäcilia Zirn, Anas Elghafari |
LREC | 3 |