Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Eric Schmutz

dblp:71/4949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › analysis of algorithms
average-case analysis
0.412020
Periods of Iterations of Functions with Restricted Preimage Sizes · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › permutation
cycle structure
0.412020
Periods of Iterations of Functions with Restricted Preimage Sizes · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
probabilistic combinatorics
0.412020
Periods of Iterations of Functions with Restricted Preimage Sizes · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › probabilistic combinatorics
random mappings
0.412020
Periods of Iterations of Functions with Restricted Preimage Sizes · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributional convergence · 0.4asymptotic analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Periods of Iterations of Functions with Restricted Preimage Sizes
abstract
Let [ n { = {1, …, n } and let Ω n be the set of all mappings from [ n { to itself. Let f be a random uniform element of Ω n and let T( f ) and B( f ) denote, respectively, the least common multiple and the product of the length of the cycles of f . Harris proved in 1973 that T converges in distribution to a standard normal distribution and, in 2011, Schmutz obtained an asymptotic estimate on the logarithm of the expectation of T and B over all mappings on n nodes. We obtain analogous results for random uniform mappings on n = kr nodes with preimage sizes restricted to a set of the form {0,k}, where k = k ( r ) ≥ 2. This is motivated by the use of these classes of mappings as heuristic models for the statistics of polynomials of the form x k + a over the integers modulo p , with p ≡ 1 (mod k). We exhibit and discuss our numerical results on this heuristic.
Rodrigo S. V. Martins, Daniel Panario, Claudio M. Qureshi, Eric Schmutz
ACM Trans. Algorithms4
2018 Periods of Iterations of Mappings over Finite Fields with Restricted Preimage Sizes
abstract
Let f be a uniformly random element of the set of all mappings from [n] = {1, ..., n} to itself. Let T(f) and B(f) denote, respectively, the least common multiple and the product of the lengths of the cycles of f. Harris proved in 1973 that log T converges in distribution to a standard normal distribution and, in 2011, Schmutz obtained an asymptotic estimate on the logarithm of the expectation of T and B over all mappings on n nodes. We obtain analogous results for uniform random mappings on n = kr nodes with preimage sizes restricted to a set of the form {0,k}, where k = k(r) >= 2. This is motivated by the use of these classes of mappings as heuristic models for the statistics of polynomials of the form x^k + a over the integers modulo p, where k divides p - 1. We exhibit and discuss our numerical results on this heuristic.
Rodrigo S. V. Martins, Daniel Panario, Claudio M. Qureshi, Eric Schmutz
AofA4
2006 The Expected Size of the Rule k Dominating Set
Jennie C. Hansen, Eric Schmutz, Li Sheng 0001
Algorithmica2
2001 Near-Optimal Bounded-Degree Spanning Trees
Jennie C. Hansen, Eric Schmutz
Algorithmica2
1994 Random Set Partitions
abstract
For random partitions of $[ n ]$, let $L_n $ and $R_n $, respectively, denote the maximum block size and its multiplicity. The average multiplicity is $E( R_n ) = H( \{ m_n \} ) + o( 1 )$ as $n \to \infty $, where H is an explicitly given analytic function and $\{ m_n \}$ is the fractional part of a certain implicitly defined root. The cumulative distribution function of $L_n $ also depends on $\{ m_n \}$. The sequence $\langle \{ m_n\}\rangle^{\infty}_{n=1}$ is dense in (0, 1). This establishes both the nonexistence of a limit distribution for $L_n $ and the nonexistence of a limiting value for $E( R_n )$.
William M. Y. Goh, Eric Schmutz
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2