VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
James V. Burke
dblp:71/6610
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-0215-7306ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse NoiseabstractWe study a class of real robust phase retrieval problems under a Gaussian assumption on the coding matrix when the received signal is sparsely corrupted by noise. The goal is to establish conditions on the sparsity under which the input vector can be exactly recovered. The recovery problem is formulated as residual minimization in the ℓ1-norm. The main contribution is a robust phase retrieval counterpart to the seminal paper by Candes and Tao on compressed sensing (ℓ1regression) [Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(12):4203-4215, 2005]. The analysis depends on a key new property of the coding matrix called the Absolute Range Property (ARP) which is the analogue to the Null Space Property (NSP) in compressed sensing. When the residuals are computed using squared magnitudes, we show that ARP follows from a standard Restricted Isometry Property (RIP). However, when the residuals are computed using absolute magnitudes, a different kind of RIP or growth property is required. We conclude by showing that the robust phase retrieval objectives are sharp with respect to their minimizers with high probability. Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, James V. Burke, Daiwei He |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2015 | The Connection Between Bayesian Estimation of a Gaussian Random Field and RKHSabstractReconstruction of a function from noisy data is key in machine learning and is often formulated as a regularized optimization problem over an infinite-dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The solution suitably balances adherence to the observed data and the corresponding RKHS norm. When the data fit is measured using a quadratic loss, this estimator has a known statistical interpretation. Given the noisy measurements, the RKHS estimate represents the posterior mean (minimum variance estimate) of a Gaussian random field with covariance proportional to the kernel associated with the RKHS. In this brief, we provide a statistical interpretation when more general losses are used, such as absolute value, Vapnik or Huber. Specifically, for any finite set of sampling locations (that includes where the data were collected), the maximum a posteriori estimate for the signal samples is given by the RKHS estimate evaluated at the sampling locations. This connection establishes a firm statistical foundation for several stochastic approaches used to estimate unknown regularization parameters. To illustrate this, we develop a numerical scheme that implements a Bayesian estimator with an absolute value loss. This estimator is used to learn a function from measurements contaminated by outliers. Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Bradley M. Bell, James V. Burke, Gianluigi Pillonetto |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 3 |
| 2014 | Convex vs non-convex estimators for regression and sparse estimation: the mean squared error properties of ARD and GLasso
Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, James V. Burke, Alessandro Chiuso, Gianluigi Pillonetto |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2013 | Sparse/robust estimation and Kalman smoothing with nonsmooth log-concave densities: modeling, computation, and theory
Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, James V. Burke, Gianluigi Pillonetto |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2004 | Variational Analysis of the Abscissa Mapping for Polynomials via the Gauss-Lucas Theorem
James V. Burke, Adrian S. Lewis, Michael L. Overton |
J. Glob. Optim. | 1 |