Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dori Peleg

dblp:71/6998 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 30% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 26%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › evolutionary computation
cross-entropy method
0.112005
The cross entropy method for classification · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.112005
The cross entropy method for classification · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.012004
A Feature Selection Algorithm Based on the Global Minimization of a Generalization Error Bound · NIPS 2004
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.012004
A Feature Selection Algorithm Based on the Global Minimization of a Generalization Error Bound · NIPS 2004
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
data-dependent generalization bounds
0.012004
A Feature Selection Algorithm Based on the Global Minimization of a Generalization Error Bound · NIPS 2004
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.012004
A Feature Selection Algorithm Based on the Global Minimization of a Generalization Error Bound · NIPS 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

global optimization · 0.1conic quadratic programming · 0.1linear programming · 0.1cross-entropy method · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 A sparsity driven kernel machine based on minimizing a generalization error bound
Dori Peleg, Ron Meir
Pattern Recognit.1
2008 A bilinear formulation for vector sparsity optimization
Dori Peleg, Ron Meir
Signal Process.1
2005 The cross entropy method for classification
abstract
We consider support vector machines for binary classification. As opposed to most approaches we use the number of support vectors (the "L0 norm") as a regularizing term instead of the L1 or L2 norms. In order to solve the optimization problem we use the cross entropy method to search over the possible sets of support vectors. The algorithm consists of solving a sequence of efficient linear programs. We report experiments where our method produces generalization errors that are similar to support vector machines, while using a considerably smaller number of support vectors.
Shie Mannor, Dori Peleg, Reuven Y. Rubinstein
ICML2
2004 A Feature Selection Algorithm Based on the Global Minimization of a Generalization Error Bound
abstract
A novel linear feature selection algorithm is presented based on the global minimization of a data-dependent generalization error bound. Feature selection and scaling algorithms often lead to non-convex opti- mization problems, which in many previous approaches were addressed through gradient descent procedures that can only guarantee convergence to a local minimum. We propose an alternative approach, whereby the global solution of the non-convex optimization problem is derived via an equivalent optimization problem. Moreover, the convex optimization task is reduced to a conic quadratic programming problem for which effi- cient solvers are available. Highly competitive numerical results on both artificial and real-world data sets are reported.
Dori Peleg, Ron Meir
NIPS1