Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aaron Riesbeck
dblp:71/7880
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
software process |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Applications of Simulation and AI Search: Assessing the Relative Merits of Agile vs Traditional Software Development · ASE 2009 |
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Applications of Simulation and AI Search: Assessing the Relative Merits of Agile vs Traditional Software Development · ASE 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.2AI search · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Applications of Simulation and AI Search: Assessing the Relative Merits of Agile vs Traditional Software DevelopmentabstractThis paper augments Boehm-Turner's model of agile and plan-based software development augmented with an AI search algorithm. The AI search finds the key factors that predict for the success of agile or traditional plan-based software developments. According to our simulations and AI search algorithm: (1) in no case did agile methods perform worse than plan-based approaches; (2) in some cases, agile performed best. Hence, we recommend that the default development practice for organizations be an agile method. The simplicity of this style of analysis begs the question: why is so much time wasted on evidence-less debates on software process when a simple combination of simulation plus automatic search can mature the dialog much faster? Bryan Lemon, Aaron Riesbeck, Tim Menzies, Justin Price, Joseph D'Alessandro, Rikard Carlsson, Tomi Prifiti, Fayola Peters, Huihua Lu, Daniel Port |
ASE | 2 |