Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mitsuteru Nakao

dblp:71/905 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.012010
BioRuby: bioinformatics software for the Ruby programming language · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction
0.011999
Modeling and predicting transcriptional units of <$O_SSF>Escherichia coli<$C_SSF>genes using hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
transcriptional unit prediction
0.011999
Modeling and predicting transcriptional units of <$O_SSF>Escherichia coli<$C_SSF>genes using hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation › prokaryotic genome annotation
bacterial genome annotation
0.011999
Modeling and predicting transcriptional units of <$O_SSF>Escherichia coli<$C_SSF>genes using hidden Markov models · Bioinform. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ruby · 0.1ribosomal binding site modeling · 0.0hidden markov model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 BioRuby: bioinformatics software for the Ruby programming language
abstract
SUMMARY: The BioRuby software toolkit contains a comprehensive set of free development tools and libraries for bioinformatics and molecular biology, written in the Ruby programming language. BioRuby has components for sequence analysis, pathway analysis, protein modelling and phylogenetic analysis; it supports many widely used data formats and provides easy access to databases, external programs and public web services, including BLAST, KEGG, GenBank, MEDLINE and GO. BioRuby comes with a tutorial, documentation and an interactive environment, which can be used in the shell, and in the web browser. AVAILABILITY: BioRuby is free and open source software, made available under the Ruby license. BioRuby runs on all platforms that support Ruby, including Linux, Mac OS X and Windows. And, with JRuby, BioRuby runs on the Java Virtual Machine. The source code is available from http://www.bioruby.org/. CONTACT: [email protected]
Naohisa Goto, Pjotr Prins, Mitsuteru Nakao, Raoul Jean Pierre Bonnal, Jan Aerts, Toshiaki Katayama
Bioinform.3
1999 Modeling and predicting transcriptional units of <$O_SSF>Escherichia coli<$C_SSF>genes using hidden Markov models
abstract
MOTIVATION: The hidden Markov model (HMM) is a valuable technique for gene-finding, especially because its flexibility enables the inclusion of various sequence features. Recent programs for bacterial gene-finding include the information of ribosomal binding site (RBS) to improve the recognition accuracy of the start codon, using this feature. We report here our attempt to extend the model into the total transcriptional unit, enabling the prediction of operon structures. RESULTS: First, we improved the prediction accuracy of coding sequences (CDSs) by employing the models of 'typical', 'atypical' and 'negative (false-positive)' classes as well as the models of RBS and its downstream spacer. The sensitivity of exactly predicting the 204 experimentally confirmed CDSs reached 90.2% in an objective test. Based on the prediction result of CDSs, the positions of the promoters and terminators were predicted. Our model could exactly recognize 60% of 390 known transcriptional units. Thus, the accuracy and significance of this prediction problem is far from trivial. We would like to propose this problem as an open theme in bioinformatics because the ongoing or planned post-sequencing projects will produce much data for future improvements.
Tetsushi Yada, Mitsuteru Nakao, Yasushi Totoki, Kenta Nakai
Bioinform.2