VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert M. Waterhouse
dblp:71/9441
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4199-9052ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
assembly quality assessment |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single-copy ortholog analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | CrowdGO: Machine learning and semantic similarity guided consensus Gene Ontology annotationabstractCharacterising gene function for the ever-increasing number and diversity of species with annotated genomes relies almost entirely on computational prediction methods. These software are also numerous and diverse, each with different strengths and weaknesses as revealed through community benchmarking efforts. Meta-predictors that assess consensus and conflict from individual algorithms should deliver enhanced functional annotations. To exploit the benefits of meta-approaches, we developed CrowdGO, an open-source consensus-based Gene Ontology (GO) term meta-predictor that employs machine learning models with GO term semantic similarities and information contents. By re-evaluating each gene-term annotation, a consensus dataset is produced with high-scoring confident annotations and low-scoring rejected annotations. Applying CrowdGO to results from a deep learning-based, a sequence similarity-based, and two protein domain-based methods, delivers consensus annotations with improved precision and recall. Furthermore, using standard evaluation measures CrowdGO performance matches that of the community's best performing individual methods. CrowdGO therefore offers a model-informed approach to leverage strengths of individual predictors and produce comprehensive and accurate gene functional annotations. Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders, Robert M. Waterhouse |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2015 | BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologsabstractMOTIVATION: Genomics has revolutionized biological research, but quality assessment of the resulting assembled sequences is complicated and remains mostly limited to technical measures like N50. RESULTS: We propose a measure for quantitative assessment of genome assembly and annotation completeness based on evolutionarily informed expectations of gene content. We implemented the assessment procedure in open-source software, with sets of Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs, named BUSCO. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software implemented in Python and datasets available for download from http://busco.ezlab.org. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Felipe A. Simão, Robert M. Waterhouse, Panagiotis Ioannidis 0001, Evgenia V. Kriventseva, Evgeny M. Zdobnov |
Bioinform. | 2 |