VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bharath Sankaran
dblp:71/9968
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-0988-3885ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 24% Image recognition and object detection · 21% Robot manipulation · 17% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
active object detection |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Nonmyopic View Planning for Active Object Classification and Pose Estimation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014 Hypothesis testing framework for active object detection · ICRA 2013 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
view planning |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Nonmyopic View Planning for Active Object Classification and Pose Estimation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014 Hypothesis testing framework for active object detection · ICRA 2013 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot sensing › perception for manipulation
interactive perception |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Interactive Perception: Leveraging Action in Perception and Perception in Action · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
object pose estimation |
0.2 | 2 | 2014 | Nonmyopic View Planning for Active Object Classification and Pose Estimation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014 Hypothesis testing framework for active object detection · ICRA 2013 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
self-supervised segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Self-supervised segmentation of river scenes · ICRA 2011 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Self-supervised segmentation of river scenes · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
active perception |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Nonmyopic View Planning for Active Object Classification and Pose Estimation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
point-based approximation · 0.2partially observable markov decision process · 0.2point-based approximate POMDP · 0.2m-ary hypothesis testing · 0.2texture · 0.1self-supervised learning · 0.1image location · 0.1color · 0.1appearance model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Interactive Perception: Leveraging Action in Perception and Perception in ActionabstractRecent approaches in robot perception follow the insight that perception is facilitated by interaction with the environment. These approaches are subsumed under the term Interactive Perception (IP). This view of perception provides the following benefits. First, interaction with the environment creates a rich sensory signal that would otherwise not be present. Second, knowledge of the regularity in the combined space of sensory data and action parameters facilitates the prediction and interpretation of the sensory signal. In this survey, we postulate this as a principle for robot perception and collect evidence in its support by analyzing and categorizing existing work in this area. We also provide an overview of the most important applications of IP. We close this survey by discussing remaining open questions. With this survey, we hope to help define the field of Interactive Perception and to provide a valuable resource for future research. Jeannette Bohg, Karol Hausman, Bharath Sankaran, Oliver Brock, Danica Kragic, Stefan Schaal, Gaurav S. Sukhatme |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |
| 2016 | Parameter learning for improving binary descriptor matchingabstractBinary descriptors allow fast detection and matching algorithms in computer vision problems. Though binary descriptors can be computed at almost two orders of magnitude faster than traditional gradient based descriptors, they suffer from poor matching accuracy in challenging conditions. In this paper we propose three improvements for binary descriptors in their computation and matching that enhance their performance in comparison to traditional binary and non-binary descriptors without compromising their speed. This is achieved by learning some weights and threshold parameters that allow customized matching under some variations such as lighting and viewpoint. Our suggested improvements can be easily applied to any binary descriptor. We demonstrate our approach on the ORB (Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF) descriptor and compare its performance with the traditional ORB and SIFT descriptors on a wide variety of datasets. In all instances, our enhancements outperform standard ORB and are comparable to SIFT. Bharath Sankaran, Srikumar Ramalingam, Yuichi Taguchi |
IROS | 1 |
| 2014 | Nonmyopic View Planning for Active Object Classification and Pose EstimationabstractOne of the central problems in computer vision is the detection of semantically important objects and the estimation of their pose. Most of the work in object detection has been based on single image processing, and its performance is limited by occlusions and ambiguity in appearance and geometry. This paper proposes an active approach to object detection in which the point of view of a mobile depth camera is controlled. When an initial static detection phase identifies an object of interest, several hypotheses are made about its class and orientation. Then, a sequence of views, which balances the amount of energy used to move the sensor with the chance of identifying the correct hypothesis, is planned. We formulate an active hypothesis testing problem, which includes sensor mobility, and solve it using a point-based approximate partially observable Markov decision process algorithm. The validity of our approach is verified through simulation and realworld experiments with the PR2 robot. The results suggest that the approach outperforms the widely used greedy viewpoint selection and provides a significant improvement over static object detection. Nikolay Atanasov 0001, Bharath Sankaran, Jerome Le Ny, George J. Pappas, Kostas Daniilidis |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 2 |
| 2013 | Hypothesis testing framework for active object detectionabstractOne of the central problems in computer vision is the detection of semantically important objects and the estimation of their pose. Most of the work in object detection has been based on single image processing and its performance is limited by occlusions and ambiguity in appearance and geometry. This paper proposes an active approach to object detection by controlling the point of view of a mobile depth camera. When an initial static detection phase identifies an object of interest, several hypotheses are made about its class and orientation. The sensor then plans a sequence of viewpoints, which balances the amount of energy used to move with the chance of identifying the correct hypothesis. We formulate an active M-ary hypothesis testing problem, which includes sensor mobility, and solve it using a point-based approximate POMDP algorithm. The validity of our approach is verified through simulation and experiments with real scenes captured by a kinect sensor. The results suggest a significant improvement over static object detection. Nikolay Atanasov 0001, Bharath Sankaran, Jerome Le Ny, Thomas Koletschka, George J. Pappas, Kostas Daniilidis |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2012 | Failure recovery with shared autonomyabstractBuilding robots capable of long term autonomy has been a long standing goal of robotics research. Such systems must be capable of performing certain tasks with a high degree of robustness and repeatability. In the context of personal robotics, these tasks could range anywhere from retrieving items from a refrigerator, loading a dishwasher, to setting up a dinner table. Given the complexity of tasks there are a multitude of failure scenarios that the robot can encounter, irrespective of whether the environment is static or dynamic. For a robot to be successful in such situations, it would need to know how to recover from failures or when to ask a human for help. This paper, presents a novel shared autonomy behavioral executive to addresses these issues. We demonstrate how this executive combines generalized logic based recovery and human intervention to achieve continuous failure free operation. We tested the systems over 250 trials of two different use case experiments. Our current algorithm drastically reduced human intervention from 26% to 4% on the first experiment and 46% to 9% on the second experiment. This system provides a new dimension to robot autonomy, where robots can exhibit long term failure free operation with minimal human supervision. We also discuss how the system can be generalized. Bharath Sankaran, Benjamin Pitzer, Sarah Osentoski |
IROS | 1 |
| 2011 | Self-supervised segmentation of river scenesabstractHere we consider the problem of automatically segmenting images taken from a boat or low-flying aircraft. Such a capability is important for autonomous river following and mapping. The need for accurate segmentation in a wide variety of riverine environments challenges the state of the art vision-based methods that have been used in more structured environments such as roads and highways. Apart from the lack of structure, the principal difficulty is the large spatial and temporal variations in the appearance of water in the presence of nearby vegetation and with reflections from the sky. We propose a self-supervised method to segment images into `sky', `river' and `shore' (vegetation + structures) regions. Our approach uses assumptions about river scene structure to learn appearance models based on features like color, texture and image location which are used to segment the image. We validated our algorithm by testing on four datasets captured under varying conditions on different rivers. Our self-supervised algorithm had higher accuracy rates than a supervised alternative, often significantly more accurate, and does not need to be retrained to work under different conditions. Supreeth Achar, Bharath Sankaran, Stephen Nuske, Sebastian A. Scherer, Sanjiv Singh |
ICRA | 2 |