Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hyunyoon Cho
dblp:72/10248
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Memory systems · 68% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 32% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory systems
DRAM |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017 |
Memory systems › DRAM
DRAM architecture |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SOUP-N-SALAD: Allocation-Oblivious Access Latency Reduction with Asymmetric DRAM Microarchitectures · HPCA 2017 |
Memory systems › DRAM
DRAM microarchitecture |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SOUP-N-SALAD: Allocation-Oblivious Access Latency Reduction with Asymmetric DRAM Microarchitectures · HPCA 2017 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › memory fault tolerance
DRAM resilience |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017 |
Memory systems › DRAM
DRAM scaling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction › error-correcting codes
in-DRAM ECC |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017 |
Memory systems › DRAM › DRAM latency reduction
low-latency DRAM |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | SOUP-N-SALAD: Allocation-Oblivious Access Latency Reduction with Asymmetric DRAM Microarchitectures · HPCA 2017 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error-correcting codes for memory
rank-level ECC |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.3performance modeling · 0.3microarchitectural simulation · 0.3measurement · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM DevicesabstractTechnology scaling has continuously improved the density, performance, energy efficiency, and cost of DRAM-based main memory systems. Starting from sub-20nm processes, however, the industry began to pay considerably higher costs to screen and manage notably increasing defective cells. The traditional technique, which replaces the rows/columns containing faulty cells with spare rows/columns, has been able to cost-effectively repair the defective cells so far, but it will become unaffordable soon because an excessive number of spare rows/columns are required to manage the increasing number of defective cells. This necessitates a synergistic application of an alternative resilience technique such as In-DRAM ECC with the traditional one. Through extensive measurement and simulation, we first identify that aggressive miniaturization makes DRAM cells more sensitive to random telegraph noise or variable retention time, which is dominantly manifested as a surge in randomly scattered single-cell faults. Second, we advocate using InDRAM ECC to overcome the DRAM scaling challenges and architect In-DRAM ECC to accomplish high area efficiency and minimal performance degradation. Moreover, we show that advancement in process technology reduces decoding/correction time to a small fraction of DRAM access time, and that the throughput penalty of a write operation due to an additional read for a parity update is mostly overcome by the multi-bank structure and long burst writes that span an entire In-DRAM ECC codeword. Lastly, we demonstrate that system reliability with modern rank-level ECC schemes such as single device data correction is further improved by hundred million times with the proposed In-DRAM ECC architecture. Sang-uhn Cha, Seongil O, Hyunsung Shin, Sangjoon Hwang 0001, Kwang-Il Park, Seong-Jin Jang 0002, Joo-Sun Choi, Gyo-Young Jin, Young Hoon Son, Hyunyoon Cho, Jung Ho Ahn, Nam Sung Kim |
HPCA | 10 |
| 2017 | SOUP-N-SALAD: Allocation-Oblivious Access Latency Reduction with Asymmetric DRAM MicroarchitecturesabstractMemory access latency has a significant impact on application performance. Unfortunately, the random access latency of DRAM has been scaling relatively slowly, and often directly affects the critical path of execution, especially for applications with insufficient locality or memory-level parallelism. The existing low-latency DRAM organizations either incur significant area overhead or burden the software stack with non-uniform access latency. This paper proposes two microarchitectural techniques to provide uniformly low access time over the entire DRAM chip. The first technique is SALAD, a new DRAM device architecture that provides symmetric access latency with asymmetric DRAM bank organizations. Because local regions have lower data transfer time due to their proximity to the I/O pads, SALAD applies high aspectratio (i.e., low-latency) mats only to remote regions to offset the difference in data transfer time, resulting in symmetrically low latency across regions. The second technique is SOUP (skewed organization of μbanks with pipelined accesses), which leverages asymmetry in column access latency within a region due to non-uniform distance to the column decoders. By starting I/O transfers as soon as data from near cells arrive, instead of waiting for the entire column data, SOUP further saves two memory clock cycles for column accesses for all regions. The resulting design, called SOUP-N-SALAD, improves IPC and EDP by 9.6% (11.2%) and 18.2% (21.8%) over the baseline DDR4 device, respectively, for memory-intensive SPEC CPU2006 workloads without any software modifications, while incurring only 3% (6%) area overhead. Yuhwan Ro, Hyunyoon Cho, Eojin Lee, Daejin Jung, Young Hoon Son, Jung Ho Ahn, Jae W. Lee |
HPCA | 2 |