VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srini Narayanan
dblp:72/1429
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0005-2184-3861ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 45% Language models and text generation · 44% Reinforcement learning · 11% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 75% Programming languages and type systems · 25% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Benchmark for Reasoning with Spatial Prepositions · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Benchmark for Reasoning with Spatial Prepositions · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-objective reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning all optimal policies with multiple criteria · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
value iteration |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning all optimal policies with multiple criteria · ICML 2008 |
Services computing and microservices › service composition › web service composition
automated composition |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services · WWW 2002 |
Programming languages and type systems
simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services · WWW 2002 |
Services computing and microservices › service composition
web service composition |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services · WWW 2002 |
Services computing and microservices › web services
web service verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services · WWW 2002 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services · WWW 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt engineering · 0.7value iteration · 0.1first-order logic · 0.1petri nets · 0.0petri net · 0.0decision procedures · 0.0decision procedure · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | A Benchmark for Reasoning with Spatial PrepositionsabstractSpatial reasoning is a fundamental building block of human cognition, used in representing, grounding, and reasoning about physical and abstract concepts. We propose a novel benchmark focused on assessing inferential properties of statements with spatial prepositions. The benchmark includes original datasets in English and Romanian and aims to probe the limits of reasoning about spatial relations in large language models. We use prompt engineering to study the performance of two families of large language models, PaLM and GPT-3, on our benchmark. Our results show considerable variability in the performance of smaller and larger models, as well as across prompts and languages. However, none of the models reaches human performance. Iulia M. Comsa, Srini Narayanan |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2017 | Multilingual Metaphor Processing: Experiments with Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised LearningabstractHighly frequent in language and communication, metaphor represents a significant challenge for Natural Language Processing (NLP) applications. Computational work on metaphor has traditionally evolved around the use of hand-coded knowledge, making the systems hard to scale. Recent years have witnessed a rise in statistical approaches to metaphor processing. However, these approaches often require extensive human annotation effort and are predominantly evaluated within a limited domain. In contrast, we experiment with weakly supervised and unsupervised techniques—with little or no annotation—to generalize higher-level mechanisms of metaphor from distributional properties of concepts. We investigate different levels and types of supervision (learning from linguistic examples vs. learning from a given set of metaphorical mappings vs. learning without annotation) in flat and hierarchical, unconstrained and constrained clustering settings. Our aim is to identify the optimal type of supervision for a learning algorithm that discovers patterns of metaphorical association from text. In order to investigate the scalability and adaptability of our models, we applied them to data in three languages from different language groups—English, Spanish, and Russian—achieving state-of-the-art results with little supervision. Finally, we demonstrate that statistical methods can facilitate and scale up cross-linguistic research on metaphor. Ekaterina Shutova, Lin Sun 0003, E. Dario Gutiérrez, Patricia Lichtenstein, Srini Narayanan |
Comput. Linguistics | 5 |
| 2008 | Learning all optimal policies with multiple criteriaabstractWe describe an algorithm for learning in the presence of multiple criteria. Our technique generalizes previous approaches in that it can learn optimal policies for all linear preference assignments over the multiple reward criteria at once. The algorithm can be viewed as an extension to standard reinforcement learning for MDPs where instead of repeatedly backing up maximal expected rewards, we back up the set of expected rewards that are maximal for some set of linear preferences (given by a weight vector, w). We present the algorithm along with a proof of correctness showing that our solution gives the optimal policy for any linear preference function. The solution reduces to the standard value iteration algorithm for a specific weight vector, w. Leon Barrett, Srini Narayanan |
ICML | 2 |
| 2004 | Question Answering Based on Semantic Structures
Srini Narayanan, Sanda M. Harabagiu |
COLING | 1 |
| 2003 | Semantic Extraction with Wide-Coverage Lexical Resources
Behrang Mohit, Srini Narayanan |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2003 | FrameNet Meets the Semantic Web: Lexical Semantics for the Web
Srini Narayanan, Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, Miriam R. L. Petruck |
ISWC | 1 |
| 2003 | Analysis and simulation of Web services
Srini Narayanan, Sheila A. McIlraith |
Comput. Networks | 1 |
| 2003 | The role of cortico-basal-thalamic loops in cognition: a computational model and preliminary results
Srini Narayanan |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2002 | Putting Frames in Perspective
Nancy Chang, Srini Narayanan, Miriam R. L. Petruck |
COLING | 2 |
| 2002 | DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web
Mark H. Burstein, Jerry R. Hobbs, Ora Lassila, David L. Martin 0001, Drew McDermott, Sheila A. McIlraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci 0001, Terry R. Payne, Katia P. Sycara |
ISWC | 7 |
| 2002 | Simulation, verification and automated composition of web servicesabstractWeb services-- Web-accessible programs and devices – are a key application area for the Semantic Web. With the proliferation of Web services and the evolution towards the Semantic Web comes the opportunity to automate various Web services tasks. Our objective is to enable markup and automated reasoning technology to describe, simulate, compose, test, and verify compositions of Web services. We take as our starting point the DAML-S DAML+OIL ontology for describing the capabilities of Web services. We define the semantics for a relevant subset of DAML-S in terms of a first-order logical language. With the semantics in hand, we encode our service descriptions in a Petri Net formalism and provide decision procedures for Web service simulation, verification and composition. We also provide an analysis of the complexity of these tasks under different restrictions to the DAML-S composite services we can describe. Finally, we present an implementation of our analysis techniques. This implementation takes as input a DAML-S description of a Web service, automatically generates a Petri Net and performs the desired analysis. Such a tool has broad applicability both as a back end to existing manual Web service composition tools, and as a stand-alone tool for Web service developers. Srini Narayanan, Sheila A. McIlraith |
WWW | 1 |