Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez

dblp:72/1618 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing read preprocessing
chimera detection
0.112005
Evaluating putative chimeric sequences from PCR-amplified products · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.112005
Evaluating putative chimeric sequences from PCR-amplified products · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word-based sequence comparison · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Evaluating putative chimeric sequences from PCR-amplified products
abstract
MOTIVATION: PCR amplification of highly homologous genes from complex DNA mixtures is known to generate a significant proportion of chimeric sequences. Ribosomal RNA genes are used for microbial species detection and identification in natural environments, and current assessments of microbial diversity are based on these sequences. Thus, chimeric sequences could lead to the discovery of non-existent microbial species and false diversity estimates. METHODS: In essence, our only source of information to decide if a sequence is chimeric or not is to compare it with known, non-chimeric sequences. Putative chimeric sequences were analyzed from sequence fragments of selected length (referred to as words) by comparing nucleotides at corresponding positions. Distances for each word between reference sequences (closely related to the tested sequence) were compared to the differences introduced by the tested sequence. The proposed strategy considers the actual variability existing in different regions throughout the analyzed sequences. The result is an efficient strategy for the evaluation of putative chimeric sequences. AVAILABILITY: A program computing the above procedure, Chimera and Cross-Over Detection and Evaluation (Ccode), is available at http://www.irnase.csic.es/users/jmgrau/index.html and http://www.rtphc.csic.es/download.html.
Juan M. Gonzalez, Johannes Zimmermann, Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez
Bioinform.3