Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Muzhou Yang

dblp:72/1900 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 25% Learning paradigms · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty
1.012026
Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › hyperspectral image analysis
hyperspectral image classification
1.012026
Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised classification
1.012026
Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
1.012026
Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty-guided dual sampling · 1.0pseudo-labeling · 1.0fine-grained dynamic assignment · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification
abstract
Confidence alone is often misleading in hyperspectral image classification, as models tend to mistake high predictive scores for correctness while lacking awareness of uncertainty. This leads to confirmation bias, especially under sparse annotations or class imbalance, where models overfit confident errors and fail to generalize. We propose CABIN (Cognitive-Aware Behavior-Informed learNing), a semi-supervised framework that addresses this limitation through a closed-loop learning process of perception, action, and correction. CABIN first develops perceptual awareness by estimating epistemic uncertainty, identifying ambiguous regions where errors are likely to occur. It then acts by adopting an Uncertainty-Guided Dual Sampling Strategy, selecting uncertain samples for exploration while anchoring confident ones as stable pseudo-labels to reduce bias. To correct noisy supervision, CABIN introduces a Fine-Grained Dynamic Assignment Strategy that categorizes pseudo-labeled data into reliable, ambiguous, and noisy subsets, applying tailored losses to enhance generalization. Experimental results show that a wide range of state-of-the-art methods benefit from the integration of CABIN, with improved labeling efficiency and performance.
Muzhou Yang, Wuzhou Quan, Mingqiang Wei
AAAI1