Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Muzhou Yang
dblp:72/1900
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 25% Learning paradigms · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › hyperspectral image analysis
hyperspectral image classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral Classification · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty-guided dual sampling · 1.0pseudo-labeling · 1.0fine-grained dynamic assignment · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Perceive, Act and Correct: Confidence Is Not Enough for Hyperspectral ClassificationabstractConfidence alone is often misleading in hyperspectral image classification, as models tend to mistake high predictive scores for correctness while lacking awareness of uncertainty. This leads to confirmation bias, especially under sparse annotations or class imbalance, where models overfit confident errors and fail to generalize. We propose CABIN (Cognitive-Aware Behavior-Informed learNing), a semi-supervised framework that addresses this limitation through a closed-loop learning process of perception, action, and correction. CABIN first develops perceptual awareness by estimating epistemic uncertainty, identifying ambiguous regions where errors are likely to occur. It then acts by adopting an Uncertainty-Guided Dual Sampling Strategy, selecting uncertain samples for exploration while anchoring confident ones as stable pseudo-labels to reduce bias. To correct noisy supervision, CABIN introduces a Fine-Grained Dynamic Assignment Strategy that categorizes pseudo-labeled data into reliable, ambiguous, and noisy subsets, applying tailored losses to enhance generalization. Experimental results show that a wide range of state-of-the-art methods benefit from the integration of CABIN, with improved labeling efficiency and performance. Muzhou Yang, Wuzhou Quan, Mingqiang Wei |
AAAI | 1 |