Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kai Zhao 0003
dblp:72/2621-3
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0009-0008-7715-7934ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 37% Machine translation · 31% Information extraction and text analysis · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Automata and formal languages · 38% Approximation and online algorithms · 12% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | When to Finish? Optimal Beam Search for Neural Text Generation (modulo beam size) · EMNLP 2017 Search-Aware Tuning for Hierarchical Phrase-based Decoding · EMNLP 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA folding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | LinearFold: linear-time approximate RNA folding by 5'-to-3' dynamic programming and beam search · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA secondary structure prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | LinearFold: linear-time approximate RNA folding by 5'-to-3' dynamic programming and beam search · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | LinearFold: linear-time approximate RNA folding by 5'-to-3' dynamic programming and beam search · Bioinform. 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | When to Finish? Optimal Beam Search for Neural Text Generation (modulo beam size) · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Joint Syntacto-Discourse Parsing and the Syntacto-Discourse Treebank · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | When to Finish? Optimal Beam Search for Neural Text Generation (modulo beam size) · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
neural text generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | When to Finish? Optimal Beam Search for Neural Text Generation (modulo beam size) · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
hierarchical phrase-based translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Search-Aware Tuning for Hierarchical Phrase-based Decoding · EMNLP 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
parameter tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Search-Aware Tuning for Hierarchical Phrase-based Decoding · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Search-Aware Tuning for Hierarchical Phrase-based Decoding · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Max-Violation Perceptron and Forced Decoding for Scalable MT Training · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Online Learning for Inexact Hypergraph Search · EMNLP 2013 |
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal Incremental Parsing via Best-First Dynamic Programming · EMNLP 2013 |
Automata and formal languages
parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimal Incremental Parsing via Best-First Dynamic Programming · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
constituency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Joint Syntacto-Discourse Parsing and the Syntacto-Discourse Treebank · EMNLP 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
beam search |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Online Learning for Inexact Hypergraph Search · EMNLP 2013 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Max-Violation Perceptron and Forced Decoding for Scalable MT Training · EMNLP 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
beam search · 0.7perceptron · 0.7dynamic programming · 0.5incremental parsing · 0.4sparse features · 0.3online learning · 0.3forced decoding · 0.3span-based parsing · 0.3joint parsing · 0.3bounded length reward · 0.3search-aware tuning · 0.2inside-outside algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | LinearFold: linear-time approximate RNA folding by 5'-to-3' dynamic programming and beam searchabstractMOTIVATION: Predicting the secondary structure of an ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequence is useful in many applications. Existing algorithms [based on dynamic programming] suffer from a major limitation: their runtimes scale cubically with the RNA length, and this slowness limits their use in genome-wide applications. RESULTS: We present a novel alternative O(n3)-time dynamic programming algorithm for RNA folding that is amenable to heuristics that make it run in O(n) time and O(n) space, while producing a high-quality approximation to the optimal solution. Inspired by incremental parsing for context-free grammars in computational linguistics, our alternative dynamic programming algorithm scans the sequence in a left-to-right (5'-to-3') direction rather than in a bottom-up fashion, which allows us to employ the effective beam pruning heuristic. Our work, though inexact, is the first RNA folding algorithm to achieve linear runtime (and linear space) without imposing constraints on the output structure. Surprisingly, our approximate search results in even higher overall accuracy on a diverse database of sequences with known structures. More interestingly, it leads to significantly more accurate predictions on the longest sequence families in that database (16S and 23S Ribosomal RNAs), as well as improved accuracies for long-range base pairs (500+ nucleotides apart), both of which are well known to be challenging for the current models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our source code is available at https://github.com/LinearFold/LinearFold, and our webserver is at http://linearfold.org (sequence limit: 100 000nt). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Liang Huang 0001, He Zhang 0025, Dezhong Deng, Kai Zhao 0003, Kaibo Liu, David A. Hendrix, David H. Mathews |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2017 | When to Finish? Optimal Beam Search for Neural Text Generation (modulo beam size)abstractIn neural text generation such as neural machine translation, summarization, and image captioning, beam search is widely used to improve the output text quality. However, in the neural generation setting, hypotheses can finish in different steps, which makes it difficult to decide when to end beam search to ensure optimality. We propose a provably optimal beam search algorithm that will always return the optimal-score complete hypothesis (modulo beam size), and finish as soon as the optimality is established. To counter neural generation’s tendency for shorter hypotheses, we also introduce a bounded length reward mechanism which allows a modified version of our beam search algorithm to remain optimal. Experiments on neural machine translation demonstrate that our principled beam search algorithm leads to improvement in BLEU score over previously proposed alternatives. Liang Huang 0001, Kai Zhao 0003, Mingbo Ma |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2017 | Joint Syntacto-Discourse Parsing and the Syntacto-Discourse TreebankabstractDiscourse parsing has long been treated as a stand-alone problem independent from constituency or dependency parsing.Most attempts at this problem are pipelined rather than end-to-end, sophisticated, and not self-contained: they assume goldstandard text segmentations (Elementary Discourse Units), and use external parsers for syntactic features.In this paper we propose the first end-to-end discourse parser that jointly parses in both syntax and discourse levels, as well as the first syntacto-discourse treebank by integrating the Penn Treebank with the RST Treebank.Built upon our recent span-based constituency parser, this joint syntactodiscourse parser requires no preprocessing whatsoever (such as segmentation or feature extraction), achieves the state-of-theart end-to-end discourse parsing accuracy. Kai Zhao 0003, Liang Huang 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2017 | Jointly Trained Sequential Labeling and Classification by Sparse Attention Neural NetworksabstractSentence-level classification and sequential labeling are two fundamental tasks in language understanding.While these two tasks are usually modeled separately, in reality, they are often correlated, for example in intent classification and slot filling, or in topic classification and named-entity recognition.In order to utilize the potential benefits from their correlations, we propose a jointly trained model for learning the two tasks simultaneously via Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks.This model predicts the sentence-level category and the word-level label sequence from the stepwise output hidden representations of LSTM.We also introduce a novel mechanism of "sparse attention" to weigh words differently based on their semantic relevance to sentence-level classification.The proposed method outperforms baseline models on ATIS and TREC datasets. Mingbo Ma, Kai Zhao 0003, Liang Huang 0001, Bing Xiang, Bowen Zhou 0006 |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2016 | Textual Entailment with Structured Attentions and CompositionabstractDeep learning techniques are increasingly popular in the textual entailment task, overcoming the fragility of traditional discrete models with hard alignments and logics. In particular, the recently proposed attention models (Rocktäschel et al., 2015; Wang and Jiang, 2015) achieves state-of-the-art accuracy by computing soft word alignments between the premise and hypothesis sentences. However, there remains a major limitation: this line of work completely ignores syntax and recursion, which is helpful in many traditional efforts. We show that it is beneficial to extend the attention model to tree nodes between premise and hypothesis. More importantly, this subtree-level attention reveals information about entailment relation. We study the recursive composition of this subtree-level entailment relation, which can be viewed as a soft version of the Natural Logic framework (MacCartney and Manning, 2009). Experiments show that our structured attention and entailment composition model can correctly identify and infer entailment relations from the bottom up, and bring significant improvements in accuracy. Kai Zhao 0003, Liang Huang 0001, Mingbo Ma |
COLING | 1 |
| 2015 | Search-Aware Tuning for Hierarchical Phrase-based DecodingabstractParameter tuning is a key problem for statistical machine translation (SMT).Most popular parameter tuning algorithms for SMT are agnostic of decoding, resulting in parameters vulnerable to search errors in decoding.The recent research of "search-aware tuning" (Liu and Huang, 2014) addresses this problem by considering the partial derivations in every decoding step so that the promising ones are more likely to survive the inexact decoding beam.We extend this approach from phrase-based translation to syntaxbased translation by generalizing the evaluation metrics for partial translations to handle tree-structured derivations in a way inspired by inside-outside algorithm.Our approach is simple to use and can be applied to most of the conventional parameter tuning methods as a plugin.Extensive experiments on Chinese-to-English translation show significant BLEU improvements on MERT, MIRA and PRO. Feifei Zhai, Liang Huang 0001, Kai Zhao 0003 |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2015 | Type-Driven Incremental Semantic Parsing with PolymorphismabstractSemantic parsing has made significant progress, but most current semantic parsers are extremely slow (CKY-based) and rather primitive in representation. We introduce three new techniques to tackle these problems. First, we design the first linear-time incremental shift-reduce-style semantic parsing algorithm which is more efficient than conventional cubic-time bottom-up semantic parsers. Second, our parser, being type-driven instead of syntax-driven, uses type-checking to decide the direction of reduction, which eliminates the need for a syntactic grammar such as CCG. Third, to fully exploit the power of type-driven semantic parsing beyond simple types (such as entities and truth values), we borrow from programming language theory the concepts of subtype polymorphism and parametric polymorphism to enrich the type system in order to better guide the parsing. Our system learns very accurate parses in GEOQUERY, JOBS and ATIS domains. Kai Zhao 0003, Liang Huang 0001 |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2013 | Max-Violation Perceptron and Forced Decoding for Scalable MT TrainingabstractWhile large-scale discriminative training has triumphed in many NLP problems, its definite success on machine translation has been largely elusive.Most recent efforts along this line are not scalable (training on the small dev set with features from top ∼100 most frequent words) and overly complicated.We instead present a very simple yet theoretically motivated approach by extending the recent framework of "violation-fixing perceptron", using forced decoding to compute the target derivations.Extensive phrase-based translation experiments on both Chinese-to-English and Spanish-to-English tasks show substantial gains in BLEU by up to +2.3/+2.0 on dev/test over MERT, thanks to 20M+ sparse features.This is the first successful effort of large-scale online discriminative training for MT. Heng Yu 0006, Liang Huang 0001, Haitao Mi, Kai Zhao 0003 |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2013 | Online Learning for Inexact Hypergraph SearchabstractOnline learning algorithms like the perceptron are widely used for structured prediction tasks.For sequential search problems, like left-to-right tagging and parsing, beam search has been successfully combined with perceptron variants that accommodate search errors (Collins and Roark, 2004;Huang et al., 2012).However, perceptron training with inexact search is less studied for bottom-up parsing and, more generally, inference over hypergraphs.In this paper, we generalize the violation-fixing perceptron of Huang et al. (2012) to hypergraphs and apply it to the cube-pruning parser of Zhang and McDonald (2012).This results in the highest reported scores on WSJ evaluation set (UAS 93.50% and LAS 92.41% respectively) without the aid of additional resources. Hao Zhang 0010, Liang Huang 0001, Kai Zhao 0003, Ryan T. McDonald |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2013 | Optimal Incremental Parsing via Best-First Dynamic ProgrammingabstractWe present the first provably optimal polynomial time dynamic programming (DP) algorithm for best-first shift-reduce parsing, which applies the DP idea of Huang and Sagae (2010) to the best-first parser of Sagae and Lavie (2006) in a non-trivial way, reducing the complexity of the latter from exponential to polynomial.We prove the correctness of our algorithm rigorously.Experiments confirm that DP leads to a significant speedup on a probablistic best-first shift-reduce parser, and makes exact search under such a model tractable for the first time. Kai Zhao 0003, James Cross 0003, Liang Huang 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2013 | Minibatch and Parallelization for Online Large Margin Structured Learning
Kai Zhao 0003, Liang Huang 0001 |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |