Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Renate Henschel

dblp:72/4702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
centering theory
0.012000
Specifying the Parameters of Centering Theory: a Corpus-Based Evaluation using Text from Application-Oriented Domains · ACL 2000
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
discourse interpretation
0.012000
Specifying the Parameters of Centering Theory: a Corpus-Based Evaluation using Text from Application-Oriented Domains · ACL 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

corpus annotation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Corpus-based NP Modifier Generation
Hua Cheng 0001, Massimo Poesio, Renate Henschel, Chris Mellish
NAACL3
2000 Specifying the Parameters of Centering Theory: a Corpus-Based Evaluation using Text from Application-Oriented Domains
abstract
The definitions of the basic concepts, rules, and constraints of centering theory involve underspecified notions such as 'previous utterance', 'realization', and 'ranking'. We attempted to find the best way of defining each such notion among those that can be annotated reliably, and using a corpus of texts in two domains of practical interest. Our main result is that trying to reduce the number of utterances without a backward-looking center (CB) results in an increased number of cases in which some discourse entity, but not the CB, gets pronominalized, and viceversa.
Massimo Poesio, Hua Cheng 0001, Renate Henschel, Janet Hitzeman, Rodger Kibble, Rosemary Stevenson
ACL3
2000 Pronominalization revisited
Renate Henschel, Hua Cheng 0001, Massimo Poesio
COLING1
1994 The Merged Upper Model: A Linguistic Ontology For German And English
Renate Henschel, John A. Bateman
COLING1
1991 Limits Of A Sentence Based Procedural Approach For Aspect Choice In German-Russian MT
abstract
In this paper we discuss some problems arising in German-Russian Machine Translation with regard to tense and aspect. Since the formal category of aspect is missing in German the information required for generating Russian aspect forms has to be extracted from different representation levels. A sentence based procedure for aspect choice in the MT system VIRTEX is presented which takes lexical, morphological and semantic criteria into account. The limits of this approach are shown. To overcome these difficulties a human interaction component is proposed.
Bianka Buschbeck-Wolf, Renate Henschel, Iris Höser, Gerda Klimonow, Andreas Küstner, Ingrid Starke
EACL2
1990 VIRTEX - a German-Russian Translation Experiment
Bianka Buschbeck-Wolf, Renate Henschel, Iris Höser, Gerda Klimonow, Andreas Küstner, Ingrid Starke
COLING2