Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edward Balaban
dblp:72/4886
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-1052-6215ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 39% Reinforcement learning · 11% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › navigation planning
informative path planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Informative Path Planning with Multimodal Sensing · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
multimodal sensing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Informative Path Planning with Multimodal Sensing · ICRA 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Informative Path Planning with Multimodal Sensing · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
sequential decision making under uncertainty |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online planning · 0.7gaussian process · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Trajectory Optimization for Adaptive Informative Path Planning with Multimodal SensingabstractWe consider the problem of an autonomous agent equipped with multiple sensors, each with different sensing precision and energy costs. The agent’s goal is to explore the environment and gather information subject to its resource constraints in unknown, partially observable environments. The challenge lies in reasoning about the effects of sensing and movement while respecting the agent’s resource and dynamic constraints. We formulate the problem as a trajectory optimization problem and solve it using a projection-based trajectory optimization approach where the objective is to reduce the variance of the Gaussian process world belief. Our approach outperforms previous approaches in long horizon trajectories by achieving an overall variance reduction of up to 85% and reducing the root-mean square error in the environment belief by 50%. This approach was developed in support of rover path planning for the NASA VIPER Mission. Joshua Ott, Edward Balaban, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
CoDIT | 2 |
| 2023 | Sequential Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Informative Path Planning with Multimodal SensingabstractAdaptive Informative Path Planning with Multi-modal Sensing (AIPPMS) considers the problem of an agent equipped with multiple sensors, each with different sensing accuracy and energy costs. The agent's goal is to explore the environment and gather information subject to its resource constraints in unknown, partially observable environments. Previous work has focused on the less general Adaptive Informative Path Planning (AIPP) problem, which considers only the effect of the agent's movement on received observations. The AIPPMS problem adds additional complexity by requiring that the agent reasons jointly about the effects of sensing and movement while balancing resource constraints with information objectives. We formulate the AIPPMS problem as a belief Markov decision process with Gaussian process beliefs and solve it using a sequential Bayesian optimization approach with online planning. Our approach consistently outperforms previous AIPPMS solutions by more than doubling the average reward received in almost every experiment while also reducing the root-mean-square error in the environment belief by 50%. We completely open-source our implementation to aid in further development and comparison.11https://github.com/sisl/SBO_AIPPMS Joshua Ott, Edward Balaban, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2019 | Unifying System Health Management and Automated Decision MakingabstractHealth management of complex dynamic systems has evolved from simple automated alarms into a subfield of artificial intelligence with techniques for analyzing off-nominal conditions and generating responses. This evolution took place largely apart from the development of automated system control, planning, and scheduling (generally referred to in this work as decision making). While there have been efforts to establish an information exchange between system health management and decision making, successful practical implementations of integrated architectures remain limited. This article proposes that rather than being treated as connected yet distinct entities, system health management and decision making should be unified in their formulations. Enabled by advances in modeling and algorithms, we believe that a unified approach will increase systems' resilience to faults and improve their effectiveness. We overview the prevalent system health management methodology, illustrate its limitations through numerical examples, and describe a proposed unified approach. We then show how typical system health management concepts are accommodated in the proposed approach without loss of functionality or generality. A computational complexity analysis of the unified approach is also provided. Edward Balaban, Stephen B. Johnson, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2017 | POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under UncertaintyabstractPOMDPs.jl is an open-source framework for solving Markov decision processes (MDPs) and partially observable MDPs (POMDPs). POMDPs.jl allows users to specify sequential decision making problems with minimal effort without sacrificing the expressive nature of POMDPs, making this framework viable for both educational and research purposes. It is written in the Julia language to allow flexible prototyping and large-scale computation that leverages the high-performance nature of the language. The associated JuliaPOMDP community also provides a number of state-of-the-art MDP and POMDP solvers and a rich library of support tools to help with implementing new solvers and evaluating the solution results. The most recent version of POMDPs.jl, the related packages, and documentation can be found at github.com/ JuliaPOMDP/POMDPs.jl. Maxim Egorov, Zachary Sunberg, Edward Balaban, Tim Allan Wheeler, Jayesh K. Gupta, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2012 | A knowledge-based system approach for sensor fault modeling, detection and mitigation
Jonny Carlos da Silva, Abhinav Saxena, Edward Balaban, Kai Goebel |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 3 |