VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kirsti Racine
dblp:72/5043
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning › data profiling
redundancy detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Redundancy Detection in Semistructured Case Bases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2001 |
Information retrieval
similarity search |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Redundancy Detection in Semistructured Case Bases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information retrieval-based algorithm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Redundancy Detection in Semistructured Case BasesabstractWith the dramatic proliferation of case-based reasoning systems in commercial applications, many case bases are now becoming legacy systems. They represent a significant portion of an organization's assets, but they are large and difficult to maintain. One of the contributing factors is that these case bases are often large and yet unstructured or semistructured; they are represented in natural language text. Adding to the complexity is the fact that the case bases are often authored and updated by different people from a variety of knowledge sources, making it highly likely for a case base to contain redundant and inconsistent knowledge. We present methods and a system for maintaining large and semistructured case bases. We focus on a difficult problem in case base maintenance: redundancy detection. This problem is particularly pervasive when one deals with a semistructured case base. We discuss an information retrieval-based algorithm and an implemented system for solving this problem. As the ability to contain the knowledge acquisition problem is of paramount importance, our method allows one to express relevant domain expertise for detecting redundancy naturally and effortlessly. Empirical evaluations of the system demonstrate the effectiveness of the methods in several large domains. Kirsti Racine, Qiang Yang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 1997 | Maintaining Unstructured Case Base
Kirsti Racine, Qiang Yang 0001 |
ICCBR | 1 |