Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Grace Wahba

dblp:72/5104 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Learning theory · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Medical and health informatics · 50%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
distributional shift
0.312017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.312017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
0.212016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112011
Learning Higher-Order Graph Structure with Features by Structure Penalty · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph structure learning
0.112011
Learning Higher-Order Graph Structure with Features by Structure Penalty · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Graph learning
high-order interaction
0.112011
Learning Higher-Order Graph Structure with Features by Structure Penalty · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning
0.112011
Learning Higher-Order Graph Structure with Features by Structure Penalty · NIPS 2011
Medical and health informatics › neurodegenerative disease analysis
alzheimer's disease study
0.112017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain imaging genetics
0.112017
When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications · ICML 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
alzheimer's disease
0.112016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Medical and health informatics
clinical data analysis
0.112016
Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.021998
The Bias-Variance Tradeoff and the Randomized GACV · NIPS 1998
Structured Machine Learning for Soft Classification with Smoothing Spline ANOVA and Stacked Tuning, Testing, and Evaluation · NIPS 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
bias-variance tradeoff
0.011998
The Bias-Variance Tradeoff and the Randomized GACV · NIPS 1998
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization error
generalization error estimation
0.011998
The Bias-Variance Tradeoff and the Randomized GACV · NIPS 1998
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
smoothing spline ANOVA
0.011993
Structured Machine Learning for Soft Classification with Smoothing Spline ANOVA and Stacked Tuning, Testing, and Evaluation · NIPS 1993
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction
0.011993
Structured Machine Learning for Soft Classification with Smoothing Spline ANOVA and Stacked Tuning, Testing, and Evaluation · NIPS 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypothesis testing · 1.1l2-consistency analysis · 0.6high-dimensional regression · 0.6continuous optimization · 0.5structure lasso · 0.1reparameterization · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1smoothing splines · 0.0stacked tuning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 When can Multi-Site Datasets be Pooled for Regression? Hypothesis Tests, $\ell_2$-consistency and Neuroscience Applications
abstract
Many studies in biomedical and health sciences involve small sample sizes due to logistic or financial constraints. Often, identifying weak (but scientifically interesting) associations between a set of predictors and a response necessitates pooling datasets from multiple diverse labs or groups. While there is a rich literature in statistical machine learning to address distributional shifts and inference in multi-site datasets, it is less clear when such pooling is guaranteed to help (and when it does not) – independent of the inference algorithms we use. In this paper, we present a hypothesis test to answer this question, both for classical and high dimensional linear regression. We precisely identify regimes where pooling datasets across multiple sites is sensible, and how such policy decisions can be made via simple checks executable on each site before any data transfer ever happens. With a focus on Alzheimer’s disease studies, we present empirical results showing that in regimes suggested by our analysis, pooling a local dataset with data from an international study improves power.
Hao Henry Zhou, Vamsi K. Ithapu, Sterling C. Johnson, Grace Wahba
ICML5
2016 Hypothesis Testing in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Applications in Alzheimer's Disease
abstract
Consider samples from two different data sources $\{\mathbf{x_s^i}\} \sim P_{\rm source}$ and $\{\mathbf{x_t^i}\} \sim P_{\rm target}$. We only observe their transformed versions $h(\mathbf{x_s^i})$ and $g(\mathbf{x_t^i})$, for some known function class $h(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$. Our goal is to perform a statistical test checking if $P_{\rm source}$ = $P_{\rm target}$ while removing the distortions induced by the transformations. This problem is closely related to concepts underlying numerous domain adaptation algorithms, and in our case, is motivated by the need to combine clinical and imaging based biomarkers from multiple sites and/or batches, where this problem is fairly common and an impediment in the conduct of analyses with much larger sample sizes. We develop a framework that addresses this problem using ideas from hypothesis testing on the transformed measurements, where in the distortions need to be estimated {\it in tandem} with the testing. We derive a simple algorithm and study its convergence and consistency properties in detail, and we also provide lower-bound strategies based on recent work in continuous optimization. On a dataset of individuals at risk for neurological disease, our results are competitive with alternative procedures that are twice as expensive and in some cases operationally infeasible to implement.
Hao Henry Zhou, Vamsi K. Ithapu, Sathya N. Ravi, Grace Wahba, Sterling C. Johnson
NIPS5
2012 The partitioned LASSO-patternsearch algorithm with application to gene expression data
abstract
BACKGROUND: In systems biology, the task of reverse engineering gene pathways from data has been limited not just by the curse of dimensionality (the interaction space is huge) but also by systematic error in the data. The gene expression barcode reduces spurious association driven by batch effects and probe effects. The binary nature of the resulting expression calls lends itself perfectly to modern regularization approaches that thrive in high-dimensional settings. RESULTS: The Partitioned LASSO-Patternsearch algorithm is proposed to identify patterns of multiple dichotomous risk factors for outcomes of interest in genomic studies. A partitioning scheme is used to identify promising patterns by solving many LASSO-Patternsearch subproblems in parallel. All variables that survive this stage proceed to an aggregation stage where the most significant patterns are identified by solving a reduced LASSO-Patternsearch problem in just these variables. This approach was applied to genetic data sets with expression levels dichotomized by gene expression bar code. Most of the genes and second-order interactions thus selected and are known to be related to the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate with simulations and data analyses that the proposed method not only selects variables and patterns more accurately, but also provides smaller models with better prediction accuracy, in comparison to several alternative methodologies.
Weiliang Shi, Grace Wahba, Rafael A. Irizarry, Héctor Corrada Bravo, Stephen J. Wright 0001
BMC Bioinform.2
2011 Learning Higher-Order Graph Structure with Features by Structure Penalty
abstract
In discrete undirected graphical models, the conditional independence of node labels Y is specified by the graph structure. We study the case where there is another input random vector X (e.g. observed features) such that the distribution P (Y | X) is determined by functions of X that characterize the (higher-order) interactions among the Y ’s. The main contribution of this paper is to learn the graph structure and the functions conditioned on X at the same time. We prove that discrete undirected graphical models with feature X are equivalent to mul- tivariate discrete models. The reparameterization of the potential functions in graphical models by conditional log odds ratios of the latter offers advantages in representation of the conditional independence structure. The functional spaces can be flexibly determined by kernels. Additionally, we impose a Structure Lasso (SLasso) penalty on groups of functions to learn the graph structure. These groups with overlaps are designed to enforce hierarchical function selection. In this way, we are able to shrink higher order interactions to obtain a sparse graph structure.
Shilin Ding, Grace Wahba, Xiaojin Zhu 0001
NIPS2
2002 Support Vector Machines for Classification in Nonstandard Situations
Yoonkyung Lee, Grace Wahba
Mach. Learn.3
2002 Statistical Properties and Adaptive Tuning of Support Vector Machines
Grace Wahba, Hao Helen Zhang 0001, Yoonkyung Lee
Mach. Learn.2
1998 The Bias-Variance Tradeoff and the Randomized GACV
Grace Wahba, Xiwu Lin, Fangyu Gao, Ronald Klein, Barbara E. Klein
NIPS1
1993 Structured Machine Learning for Soft Classification with Smoothing Spline ANOVA and Stacked Tuning, Testing, and Evaluation
Grace Wahba, Yuedong Wang, Chong Gu, Ronald Klein, Barbara E. Klein
NIPS1