Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bo Wang 0114

dblp:72/6811-114 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-7955-202XORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 46% Spatial and temporal data management · 23% Distributed and cloud data management · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 88% Distributed systems · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.812024
Sub-trajectory clustering with deep reinforcement learning · VLDB J. 2024
Data mining › clustering › sequence clustering
trajectory clustering
0.812024
Sub-trajectory clustering with deep reinforcement learning · VLDB J. 2024
Spatial and temporal data management
trajectory data management
0.812024
Sub-trajectory clustering with deep reinforcement learning · VLDB J. 2024
Database system architecture and tuning › database system implementation
database kernel design
0.512021
Towards Cost-Effective and Elastic Cloud Database Deployment via Memory Disaggregation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Distributed and cloud data management › cloud database
disaggregated database architecture
0.512021
PolarDB Serverless: A Cloud Native Database for Disaggregated Data Centers · SIGMOD Conference 2021
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud data management
cloud-native database
0.512021
PolarDB Serverless: A Cloud Native Database for Disaggregated Data Centers · SIGMOD Conference 2021
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112021
Towards Cost-Effective and Elastic Cloud Database Deployment via Memory Disaggregation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource provisioning
0.112021
PolarDB Serverless: A Cloud Native Database for Disaggregated Data Centers · SIGMOD Conference 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimistic locking · 1.0memory disaggregation · 1.0index-aware prefetching · 1.0RDMA · 1.0ARIES fault tolerance protocol splitting · 1.0deep reinforcement learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Sub-trajectory clustering with deep reinforcement learning
Anqi Liang, Bin Yao 0002, Bo Wang 0114, Yinpei Liu, Zhida Chen, Jiong Xie, Feifei Li 0001
VLDB J.3
2021 PolarDB Serverless: A Cloud Native Database for Disaggregated Data Centers
abstract
\beginabstract The trend in the DBMS market is to migrate to the cloud for elasticity, high availability, and lower costs. The traditional, monolithic database architecture is difficult to meet these requirements. With the development of high-speed network and new memory technologies, disaggregated data center has become a reality: it decouples various components from monolithic servers into separated resource pools (e.g., compute, memory, and storage) and connects them through a high-speed network. The next generation cloud native databases should be designed for disaggregated data centers. In this paper, we describe the novel architecture of \name, which follows thedisaggregation design paradigm: the CPU resource on compute nodes is decoupled from remote memory pool and storage pool. Each resource pool grows or shrinks independently, providing \revon-demand provisoning at multiple dimensions while improving reliability. We also design our system to mitigate the inherent penalty brought by resource disaggregation, and introduce optimizations such as optimistic locking and index awared prefetching. Compared to the architecture that uses local resources, \name achieves better dynamic resource provisioning capabilities and 5.3 times faster failure recovery speed, while achieving comparable performance. \endabstract
Wei Cao 0006, Yingqiang Zhang, Xinjun Yang, Feifei Li 0001, Sheng Wang 0011, Qingda Hu, Xuntao Cheng, Zongzhi Chen, Zhenjun Liu, Bo Wang 0114, Haiqing Sun, Zhushi Cheng, Yusong Gao, Songlu Cai, Yunyang Zhang, Jiawang Tong
SIGMOD Conference11
2021 Towards Cost-Effective and Elastic Cloud Database Deployment via Memory Disaggregation
abstract
It is challenging for cloud-native relational databases to meet the ever-increasing needs of scaling compute and memory resources independently and elastically. The recent emergence of memory disaggregation architecture, relying on high-speed RDMA network, offers opportunities to build cost-effective and elastic cloud-native databases. There exist proposals to let unmodified applications run transparently on disaggregated systems. However, running relational database kernel atop such proposals experiences notable performance degradation and time-consuming failure recovery, offsetting the benefits of disaggregation. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose a novel database architecture called LegoBase, which explores the co-design of database kernel and memory disaggregation. It pushes the memory management back to the database layer for bypassing the Linux I/O stack and re-using or designing (remote) memory access optimizations with an understanding of data access patterns. LegoBase further splits the conventional ARIES fault tolerance protocol to independently handle the local and remote memory failures for fast recovery of compute instances. We implemented LegoBase atop MySQL. We compare LegoBase against MySQL running on a standalone machine and the state-of-the-art disaggregation proposal Infiniswap. Our evaluation shows that even with a large fraction of data placed on the remote memory, LegoBase's system performance in terms of throughput (up to 9.41% drop) and P99 latency (up to 11.58% increase) is comparable to the monolithic MySQL setup, and significantly outperforms (1.99x-2.33x, respectively) the deployment of MySQL over Infiniswap. Meanwhile, LegoBase introduces an up to 3.87x and 5.48x speedup of the recovery and warm-up time, respectively, over the monolithic MySQL and MySQL over Infiniswap, when handling failures or planned re-configurations.
Yingqiang Zhang, Chaoyi Ruan, Cheng Li 0001, Jimmy Yang, Wei Cao 0006, Feifei Li 0001, Bo Wang 0114, Jingze Huo, Chao Bi
Proc. VLDB Endow.7