Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher Palm

dblp:73/2041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 38% Empirical software engineering · 38% Concurrent programming · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
industrial case study
0.012002
Software model checking in practice: an industrial case study · ICSE 2002
Program verification › model checking
software model checking
0.012002
Software model checking in practice: an industrial case study · ICSE 2002
Concurrent programming
concurrent reactive software
0.012002
Software model checking in practice: an industrial case study · ICSE 2002
Software testing
systematic testing
0.012002
Software model checking in practice: an industrial case study · ICSE 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

verisoft · 0.0model checking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Software model checking in practice: an industrial case study
abstract
We present an application of software model checking to the analysis of a large industrial software product: Lucent Technologies' CDMA call-processing library. This software is deployed on thousands of base stations in wireless networks world-wide, where it sets up and manages millions of calls to and from mobile devices everyday. Our analysis of this software was carried out using VeriSoft, a tool developed at Bell Laboratories that implements model-checking algorithms for systematically testing concurrent reactive software.VeriSoft has now been used for over a year for analyzing several releases and versions of the CDMA call-processing software. Although we started this work with a fairly robust version of the software, the application of model checking exposed several problems that had escaped traditional testing. Model checking also helped developers maintain a high degree of confidence in the library as it evolved through its many releases and versions.To our knowledge, software model checking has rarely been applied to software systems of this scale. In this paper, we describe our experience in applying this technology in an industrial environment.
Satish Chandra 0001, Patrice Godefroid, Christopher Palm
ICSE3