Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Holger Dreger
dblp:73/280
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 4 first-authorComputer networks · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
5 papers |
Network security · 80% Digital forensics and information hiding · 20% | |
| Computer networks
4 papers |
Network measurement and analytics · 94% Edge and fog computing · 6% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 60% Storage systems · 40% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.3 | 5 | 2008 | Predicting the resource consumption of network intrusion detection systems · SIGMETRICS 2008 Enriching network security analysis with time travel · SIGCOMM 2008 Dynamic Application-Layer Protocol Analysis for Network Intrusion Detection · USENIX Security Symposium 2006 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
network forensics |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Enriching network security analysis with time travel · SIGCOMM 2008 |
Network measurement and analytics
protocol analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Dynamic Application-Layer Protocol Analysis for Network Intrusion Detection · USENIX Security Symposium 2006 |
Network measurement and analytics › measurement infrastructure
network testbed |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Packet trace manipulation rramework for test labs · Internet Measurement Conference 2004 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection
network intrusion detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Operational experiences with high-volume network intrusion detection · CCS 2004 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Predicting the resource consumption of network intrusion detection systems · SIGMETRICS 2008 |
Edge and fog computing
resource management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Operational experiences with high-volume network intrusion detection · CCS 2004 |
Network measurement and analytics
traffic analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Operational experiences with high-volume network intrusion detection · CCS 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression modeling · 0.2dynamic protocol analysis · 0.1trace merging · 0.1time-scale stretching · 0.1packet processing · 0.1load balancing · 0.1flow time-shifting · 0.1indexing · 0.1flow capture · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Predicting the Resource Consumption of Network Intrusion Detection Systems
Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann, Vern Paxson, Robin Sommer |
RAID | 1 |
| 2008 | Enriching network security analysis with time travelabstractIn many situations it can be enormously helpful to archive the raw contents of a network traffic stream to disk, to enable later inspection of activity that becomes interesting only in retrospect. We present a Time Machine (TM) for network traffic that provides such a capability. The TM leverages the heavy-tailed nature of network flows to capture nearly all of the likely-interesting traffic while storing only a small fraction of the total volume. An initial proof-of-principle prototype established the forensic value of such an approach, contributing to the investigation of numerous attacks at a site with thousands of users. Based on these experiences, a rearchitected implementation of the system provides flexible, highperformance traffic stream capture, indexing and retrieval, including an interface between the TM and a real-time network intrusion detection system (NIDS). The NIDS controls the TM by dynamically adjusting recording parameters, instructing it to permanently store suspicious activity for offline forensics, and fetching traffic from the past for retrospective analysis. We present a detailed performance evaluation of both stand-alone and joint setups, and report on experiences with running the system live in high-volume environments. Gregor Maier, Robin Sommer, Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann, Vern Paxson, Fabian Schneider 0001 |
SIGCOMM | 3 |
| 2008 | Predicting the resource consumption of network intrusion detection systemsabstractWhen installing network intrusion detection systems (NIDSs), operators are faced with a large number of parameters and analysis options for tuning trade-offs between detection accuracy versus resource requirements. In this work we set out to assist this process by understanding and predicting the CPU and memory consumption of such systems. Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann, Vern Paxson, Robin Sommer |
SIGMETRICS | 1 |
| 2006 | Dynamic Application-Layer Protocol Analysis for Network Intrusion Detection
Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2005 | Enhancing the Accuracy of Network-Based Intrusion Detection with Host-Based Context
Holger Dreger, Christian Kreibich, Vern Paxson, Robin Sommer |
DIMVA | 1 |
| 2005 | Building a Time Machine for Efficient Recording and Retrieval of High-Volume Network Traffic
Stefan Kornexl, Vern Paxson, Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann, Robin Sommer |
Internet Measurement Conference | 3 |
| 2004 | Operational experiences with high-volume network intrusion detectionabstract... (NIDSs) face extreme challenges with respect to traffic volume, traffic diversity, and resource management. While crucial for acceptance and operational deployment, the research literature mainly omits such practical difficulties. In this paper, we offer an evaluation based on extensive operational experience. More specifically, we identify and explore key factors with respect to resource management and efficient packet processing and highlight their impact using a set of real-world traces. On the one hand, these insights help us gauge the trade-offs of tuning a NIDS. On the other hand, they motivate us to explore several novel ways of reducing resource requirements. These enable us to improve the state management considerably as well as balance the processing load dynamically. Overall this enables us to operate a NIDS successfully in our highvolume network environments. Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann, Vern Paxson, Robin Sommer |
CCS | 1 |
| 2004 | Packet trace manipulation rramework for test labsabstractEvaluating network components such as network intrusion detection systems, firewalls, routers, or switches suffers from the lack of available network traffic traces that on the one hand are appropriate for a specific test environment but on the other hand have the same characteristics as actual traffic. Instead of just capturing traffic and replaying the trace, we identify a set of packet trace manipulation operations that enable us to generate a trace bottom-up: our trace primitives can be traces from different environments or artificially generated ones; our basic operations include merging of two traces, moving a flow across time, duplicating a flow, and stretching a flow's time-scale. After discussing the potential as ell as the dangers of each operation with respect to analysis at different protocol layers, we present a framework within which these operations can be realized and show an example configuration for our prototype. Andy Rupp, Holger Dreger, Anja Feldmann, Robin Sommer |
Internet Measurement Conference | 2 |