Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Humbert Suarez

dblp:73/3343 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.011994
Direction Selectivity In Primary Visual Cortex Using Massive Intracortical Connections · NIPS 1994
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › visual cortex
direction selectivity
0.011994
Direction Selectivity In Primary Visual Cortex Using Massive Intracortical Connections · NIPS 1994
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › visual cortex
visual cortex modeling
0.011994
Direction Selectivity In Primary Visual Cortex Using Massive Intracortical Connections · NIPS 1994
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › visual cortex
orientation selectivity
0.011994
Direction Selectivity In Primary Visual Cortex Using Massive Intracortical Connections · NIPS 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hysteresis · 0.0biologically realistic simulation · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Direction Selectivity In Primary Visual Cortex Using Massive Intracortical Connections
abstract
Almost all models of orientation and direction selectivity in visual cortex are based on feedforward connection schemes, where genicu(cid:173) late input provides all excitation to both pyramidal and inhibitory neurons. The latter neurons then suppress the response of the for(cid:173) mer for non-optimal stimuli. However, anatomical studies show that up to 90 % of the excitatory synaptic input onto any corti(cid:173) cal cell is provided by other cortical cells. The massive excitatory feedback nature of cortical circuits is embedded in the canonical microcircuit of Douglas &. Martin (1991). We here investigate ana(cid:173) lytically and through biologically realistic simulations the function(cid:173) ing of a detailed model of this circuitry, operating in a hysteretic mode. In the model, weak geniculate input is dramatically ampli(cid:173) fied by intracortical excitation, while inhibition has a dual role: (i) to prevent the early geniculate-induced excitation in the null di(cid:173) rection and (ii) to restrain excitation and ensure that the neurons fire only when the stimulus is in their receptive-field. Among the 4 Humbert Suarez, Christo! Koch, Rodney Douglas insights gained are the possibility that hysteresis underlies visual cortical function, paralleling proposals for short-term memory, and strong limitations on linearity tests that use gratings. Properties of visual cortical neurons are compared in detail to this model and to a classical model of direction selectivity that does not include excitatory corti co-cortical connections. The model explain a num(cid:173) ber of puzzling features of direction-selective simple cells, includ(cid:173) ing the small somatic input conductance changes that have been measured experimentally during stimulation in the null direction. The model also allows us to understand why the velocity-response curve of area 17 neurons is different from that of their LG N affer(cid:173) ents, and the origin of expansive and compressive nonlinearities in the contrast-response curve of striate cortical neurons.
Humbert Suarez, Christof Koch, Rodney J. Douglas
NIPS1
1989 Linking Linear Threshold Units with Quadratic Models of Motion Perception
abstract
Behavioral experiments on insects (Hassenstein and Reichardt 1956; Poggio and Reichardt 1976) as well as psychophysical evidence from human studies (Van Santen and Sperling 1985; Adelson and Bergen 1985; Watson and Ahumada 1985) support the notion that short-range motion perception is mediated by a system with a quadratic type of nonlinearity, as in correlation (Hassenstein and Reichardt 1956), multiplication (Torre and Poggio 1978), or squaring (Adelson and Bergen 1985). However, there is little physiological evidence for quadratic nonlinearities in directionally selective cells. For instance, the response of cortical simple cells to a moving sine grating is half-wave instead of full-wave rectified as it should be for a quadratic nonlinearity (Movshon ef al. 1978; Holub and Morton-Gibson 1981) and is linear for low contrast (Holub and Morton-Gibson 1981). Complex cells have full-wave rectified responses, but are also linear in contrast. Moreover, a detailed theoretical analysis of possible biophysical mechanisms underlying direction selectivity concludes that most do not have quadratic properties except under very limited conditions (Grzywacz and Koch 1987). Thus, it is presently mysterious how a system can show quadratic properties while its individual components do not. We briefly discuss here a simple population encoding scheme offering a possible solution to this problem.
Humbert Suarez, Christof Koch
Neural Comput.1