Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kai Zheng 0007
dblp:73/3928-7
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Learning theory · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% | |
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 62% Approximation and online algorithms · 38% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.4 | 4 | 2020 | Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits Learning · NeurIPS 2020 (Locally) Differentially Private Combinatorial Semi-Bandits · ICML 2020 Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectives · IJCAI 2017 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
1.2 | 3 | 2020 | Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits Learning · NeurIPS 2020 (Locally) Differentially Private Combinatorial Semi-Bandits · ICML 2020 Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Recommender systems › large-scale recommendation
multi-stage recommender systems |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RecFlow: An Industrial Full Flow Recommendation Dataset · ICLR 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | (Locally) Differentially Private Combinatorial Semi-Bandits · ICML 2020 Equipping Experts/Bandits with Long-term Memory · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
layer normalization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecture · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate schedule |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecture · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecture · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › learning rate schedule
warm-up |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecture · ICML 2020 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › private online learning
differentially private bandits |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
combinatorial semi-bandits |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | (Locally) Differentially Private Combinatorial Semi-Bandits · ICML 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Equipping Experts/Bandits with Long-term Memory · NeurIPS 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
prediction with expert advice |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Equipping Experts/Bandits with Long-term Memory · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo › langevin dynamics
stochastic gradient langevin dynamics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectives · IJCAI 2017 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Equipping Experts/Bandits with Long-term Memory · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 1.6black-box reduction · 1.6lower bound · 0.9generalized linear bandits · 0.9adaptive algorithm · 0.8kernel ridge regression · 0.6chebyshev expansion · 0.6mean-field theory · 0.4stability analysis · 0.3non-asymptotic analysis · 0.3PAC-Bayesian theory · 0.3stochastic gradient descent · 0.3random round · 0.3random projection · 0.3gradient descent with output perturbation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RecFlow: An Industrial Full Flow Recommendation DatasetabstractIndustrial recommendation systems (RS) rely on the multi-stage pipeline to balance effectiveness and efficiency when delivering items from a vast corpus to users. Existing RS benchmark datasets primarily focus on the exposure space, where novel RS algorithms are trained and evaluated. However, when these algorithms transition to real-world industrial RS, they face two critical challenges: (1) handling unexposed items—a significantly larger space than the exposed one, profoundly impacting their practical performance; and (2) overlooking the intricate interplay between multiple stages of the recommendation pipeline, resulting in suboptimal system performance. To bridge the gap between offline RS benchmarks and real-world online environments, we introduce RecFlow—an industrial full-flow recommendation dataset. Unlike existing datasets, RecFlow includes samples not only from the exposure space but also from unexposed items filtered at each stage of the RS funnel. RecFlow comprises 38 million interactions from 42,000 users across nearly 9 million items with additional 1.9 billion stage samples collected from 9.3 million online requests over 37 days and spanning 6 stages. Leveraging RecFlow, we conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate its potential in designing novel algorithms that enhance effectiveness by incorporating stage-specific samples. Some of these algorithms have already been deployed online at KuaiShou, consistently yielding significant gains. We propose RecFlow as the first comprehensive whole-pipeline benchmark dataset for the RS community, enabling research on algorithm design across the entire recommendation pipeline, including selection bias study, debiased algorithms, multi-stage consistency and optimality, multi-task recommendation, and user behavior modeling. Qi Liu 0003, Kai Zheng 0007, Rui Huang 0009, Wuchao Li, Kuo Cai, Yanan Niu, Yiqun Hui, Na Mou, Hongning Wang, Wentian Bao, Yunen Yu, Guorui Zhou, Han Li 0005, Yang Song 0008, Defu Lian, Kun Gai |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | (Locally) Differentially Private Combinatorial Semi-BanditsabstractIn this paper, we study Combinatorial Semi-Bandits (CSB) that is an extension of classic Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB) under Differential Privacy (DP) and stronger Local Differential Privacy (LDP) setting. Since the server receives more information from users in CSB, it usually causes additional dependence on the dimension of data, which is a notorious side-effect for privacy preserving learning. However for CSB under two common smoothness assumptions, we show it is possible to remove this side-effect. In detail, for $B_{\infty}$-bounded smooth CSB under either $\varepsilon$-LDP or $\varepsilon$-DP, we prove the optimal regret bound is $\Theta(\frac{mB^2_{\infty}\ln T } {\Delta\varepsilon^2})$ or $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{mB^2_{\infty}\ln T} { \Delta\varepsilon})$ respectively, where $T$ is time period, $\Delta$ is the gap of rewards and $m$ is the number of base arms, by proposing novel algorithms and matching lower bounds. For $B_1$-bounded smooth CSB under $\varepsilon$-DP, we also prove the optimal regret bound is $\tilde{\Theta}(\frac{mKB^2_1\ln T} {\Delta\varepsilon})$ with both upper bound and lower bound, where $K$ is the maximum number of feedback in each round. All above results nearly match corresponding non-private optimal rates, which imply there is no additional price for (locally) differentially private CSB in above common settings. Xiaoyu Chen 0008, Kai Zheng 0007, Zixin Zhou, Yunchang Yang, Wei Chen 0034, Liwei Wang 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | On Layer Normalization in the Transformer ArchitectureabstractThe Transformer is widely used in natural language processing tasks. To train a Transformer however, one usually needs a carefully designed learning rate warm-up stage, which is shown to be crucial to the final performance but will slow down the optimization and bring more hyper-parameter tunings. In this paper, we first study theoretically why the learning rate warm-up stage is essential and show that the location of layer normalization matters. Specifically, we prove with mean field theory that at initialization, for the original-designed Post-LN Transformer, which places the layer normalization between the residual blocks, the expected gradients of the parameters near the output layer are large. Therefore, using a large learning rate on those gradients makes the training unstable. The warm-up stage is practically helpful for avoiding this problem. On the other hand, our theory also shows that if the layer normalization is put inside the residual blocks (recently proposed as Pre-LN Transformer), the gradients are well-behaved at initialization. This motivates us to remove the warm-up stage for the training of Pre-LN Transformers. We show in our experiments that Pre-LN Transformers without the warm-up stage can reach comparable results with baselines while requiring significantly less training time and hyper-parameter tuning on a wide range of applications. Ruibin Xiong, Yunchang Yang, Di He 0001, Kai Zheng 0007, Shuxin Zheng, Chen Xing, Huishuai Zhang, Yanyan Lan, Liwei Wang 0001, Tie-Yan Liu |
ICML | 4 |
| 2020 | Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits LearningabstractWe study locally differentially private (LDP) bandits learning in this paper. First, we propose simple black-box reduction frameworks that can solve a large family of context-free bandits learning problems with LDP guarantee. Based on our frameworks, we can improve previous best results for private bandits learning with one-point feedback, such as private Bandits Convex Optimization etc, and obtain the first results for Bandits Convex Optimization (BCO) with multi-point feedback under LDP. LDP guarantee and black-box nature make our frameworks more attractive in real applications compared with previous specifically designed and relatively weaker differentially private (DP) algorithms. Further, we also extend our algorithm to Generalized Linear Bandits with regret bound $\tilde{\mc{O}}(T^{3/4}/\varepsilon)$ under $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-LDP and it is conjectured to be optimal. Note given existing $\Omega(T)$ lower bound for DP contextual linear bandits (Shariff & Sheffet, NeurIPS 2018), our result shows a fundamental difference between LDP and DP for contextual bandits. Kai Zheng 0007, Tianle Cai, Weiran Huang 0001, Zhenguo Li, Liwei Wang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Equipping Experts/Bandits with Long-term MemoryabstractWe propose the first black-box approach to obtaining long-term memory guarantees for online learning in the sense of Bousquet and Warmuth, 2002, by reducing the problem to achieving typical switching regret. Specifically, for the classical expert problem with $K$ actions and $T$ rounds, using our general framework we develop various algorithms with a regret bound of order $\order(\sqrt{T(S\ln T + n \ln K)})$ compared to any sequence of experts with $S-1$ switches among $n \leq \min\{S, K\}$ distinct experts. In addition, by plugging specific adaptive algorithms into our framework we also achieve the best of both stochastic and adversarial environments simultaneously, which resolves an open problem of Warmuth and Koolen 2014. Furthermore, we extend our results to the sparse multi-armed bandit setting and show both negative and positive results for long-term memory guarantees. As a side result, our lower bound also implies that sparse losses do not help improve the worst-case regret for contextual bandit, a sharp contrast with the non-contextual case. Kai Zheng 0007, Ilias Diakonikolas, Liwei Wang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical ViewpointsabstractWe study the generalization errors of \emph{non-convex} regularized ERM procedures using Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). Two theories are proposed with non-asymptotic discrete-time analysis, using stability and PAC-Bayesian theory respectively. The stability-based theory obtains a bound of $O\left(\frac{1}{n}L\sqrt{\beta T_N}\right)$, where $L$ is Lipschitz parameter, $\beta$ is inverse temperature, and $T_N$ is the sum of step sizes. For PAC-Bayesian theory, though the bound has a slower $O(1/\sqrt{n})$ rate, the contribution of each step decays exponentially through time, and the uniform Lipschitz constant is also replaced by actual norms of gradients along the optimization trajectory. Our bounds have reasonable dependence on aggregated step sizes, and do not explicitly depend on dimensions, norms or other capacity measures of the parameter. The bounds characterize how the noises in the algorithm itself controls the statistical learning behavior in non-convex problems, without uniform convergence in the hypothesis space, which sheds light on the effect of training algorithms on the generalization error for deep neural networks. Wenlong Mou, Liwei Wang 0001, Xiyu Zhai, Kai Zheng 0007 |
COLT | 4 |
| 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning PossibleabstractNon-interactive Local Differential Privacy (LDP) requires data analysts to collect data from users through noisy channel at once. In this paper, we extend the frontiers of Non-interactive LDP learning and estimation from several aspects. For learning with smooth generalized linear losses, we propose an approximate stochastic gradient oracle estimated from non-interactive LDP channel using Chebyshev expansion, which is combined with inexact gradient methods to obtain an efficient algorithm with quasi-polynomial sample complexity bound. For the high-dimensional world, we discover that under $\ell_2$-norm assumption on data points, high-dimensional sparse linear regression and mean estimation can be achieved with logarithmic dependence on dimension, using random projection and approximate recovery. We also extend our methods to Kernel Ridge Regression. Our work is the first one that makes learning and estimation possible for a broad range of learning tasks under non-interactive LDP model. Kai Zheng 0007, Wenlong Mou, Liwei Wang 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Efficient Private ERM for Smooth ObjectivesabstractIn this paper, we consider efficient differentially private empirical risk minimization from the viewpoint of optimization algorithms. For strongly convex and smooth objectives, we prove that gradient descent with output perturbation not only achieves nearly optimal utility, but also significantly improves the running time of previous state-of-the-art private optimization algorithms, for both $\epsilon$-DP and $(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP. For non-convex but smooth objectives, we propose an RRPSGD (Random Round Private Stochastic Gradient Descent) algorithm, which provably converges to a stationary point with privacy guarantee. Besides the expected utility bounds, we also provide guarantees in high probability form. Experiments demonstrate that our algorithm consistently outperforms existing method in both utility and running time. Kai Zheng 0007, Wenlong Mou, Liwei Wang 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |