Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yu-King R. Mok

dblp:73/4206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 53% Software testing · 47%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification
0.011981
Application of a Methodology for the Development and Validation of Reliable Process Control Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1981
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements validation
specification validation
0.011981
Application of a Methodology for the Development and Validation of Reliable Process Control Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1981
Software testing
test input generation
0.011981
Application of a Methodology for the Development and Validation of Reliable Process Control Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1981
Embedded and real-time systems › critical systems
safety-critical software
0.011981
Application of a Methodology for the Development and Validation of Reliable Process Control Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 0.0formal specification · 0.0dual specification comparison · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 Application of a Methodology for the Development and Validation of Reliable Process Control Software
abstract
This paper discusses the necessity of a good methodology for the development of reliable software, especialy with respect to the final software validation and testing activities. A formal specification development and validation methodology is proposed. This methodology has been applied to the development and validation of a pilot software, incorporating typical features of critical software for nuclear power plant safety protection. The main features of the approach indude the use of a formal specification language and the independent development of two sets of specifications. Analyses on the specifications consists of three-parts: validation against the functional requirements consistency and integrity of the specifications, and dual specification comparison based on a high-level symbolic execution technique. Dual design, implementation, and testing are performed. Automated tools to facilitate the validation and testing activities are developed to support the methodology. These includes the symbolic executor and test data generator/dual program monitor system. The experiences of applying the methodology to the pilot software are discussed, and the impact on the quality of the software is assessed.
C. V. Ramamoorthy, Yu-King R. Mok, Farokh B. Bastani, Gene H. Chin, Keiichi Suzuki
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1979 On A Systematic Approach to the Development and Validation of Critical Software for Nuclear Power Plants
C. V. Ramamoorthy, Farokh B. Bastani, John M. Favaro, Yu-King R. Mok, C. W. Nam, Keiichi Suzuki
ICSE4