Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Grufman

dblp:73/5281 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 30% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 30% Data models and query languages · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data models and query languages › data modeling
functional data model
0.011997
Distributing Semantic Constraints Between Heterogeneous Databases · ICDE 1997
Data integration and cleaning
heterogeneous data integration
0.011997
Distributing Semantic Constraints Between Heterogeneous Databases · ICDE 1997
Transaction processing and concurrency control › data integrity
integrity constraint enforcement
0.011997
Distributing Semantic Constraints Between Heterogeneous Databases · ICDE 1997
Distributed and cloud data management
multidatabase systems
0.011997
Distributing Semantic Constraints Between Heterogeneous Databases · ICDE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constraint transformation · 0.0active rules · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Distributing Semantic Constraints Between Heterogeneous Databases
abstract
In recent years, research on distributing databases over networks has become increasingly important. In this paper, we concentrate on the issues of the interoperability of heterogeneous DBMSs and enforcing integrity across a multi-database made in this fashion. This has been done through a cooperative project between Aberdeen and Linko/spl uml/ping universities, with database modules distributed between the sites. In the process, we have shown the advantage of using DBMSs based on variants of the functional data model (FDM), which has made it remarkably straightforward to interoperate queries and schema definitions. Further, we have used the constraint transformation facilities of P/FDM (Prolog implementation of FDM) to compile global constraints into active rules installed locally on one or more AMOS (Active Mediators Object System) servers. We present the theory behind this, and the conditions for it to improve performance.
Stefan Grufman, Fredrik Samson, Suzanne M. Embury, Peter M. D. Gray, Tore Risch
ICDE1