Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jake Rosin

dblp:73/5499 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 77% Program analysis · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
statistical debugging
0.112007
Statistical debugging using compound boolean predicates · ISSTA 2007
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.012007
Statistical debugging using compound boolean predicates · ISSTA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

three-valued logic · 0.1statistical estimation · 0.1machine learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Statistical debugging using compound boolean predicates
abstract
Statistical debugging uses dynamic instrumentation and machine learning to identify predicates on program state that are strongly predictive of program failure. Prior approaches have only considered simple, atomic predicates such as the directions of branches or the return values of function calls. We enrich the predicate vocabulary by adding complex Boolean formulae derived from these simple predicates. We draw upon three-valued logic, static program structure, and statistical estimation techniques to efficiently sift through large numbers of candidate Boolean predicate formulae. We present qualitative and quantitative evidence that complex predicates are practical, precise, and informative. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our approach is robust in the face of incomplete data provided by the sparse random sampling that typifies postdeployment statistical debugging.
Piramanayagam Arumuga Nainar, Jake Rosin, Ben Liblit
ISSTA3