Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ann A. Copestake
dblp:73/5801
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-0347-946XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 24 · 8 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Machine translation · 35% Information extraction and text analysis · 16% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
bilingual lexicon induction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Don't Forget the Long Tail! A Comprehensive Analysis of Morphological Generalization in Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › linguistic generalization
morphological generalization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Don't Forget the Long Tail! A Comprehensive Analysis of Morphological Generalization in Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Don't Forget the Long Tail! A Comprehensive Analysis of Morphological Generalization in Bilingual Lexicon Induction · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › sentence planning
referring expression generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Generating Referring Expressions in Open Domains · ACL 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Generating Referring Expressions in Open Domains · ACL 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics |
0.0 | 2 | 2004 | Integrating Symbolic and Statistical Representations: The Lexicon Pragmatics Interface · ACL 1997 Generating Referring Expressions in Open Domains · ACL 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
noun compound interpretation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Integrating Symbolic and Statistical Representations: The Lexicon Pragmatics Interface · ACL 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
pragmatics |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Integrating Symbolic and Statistical Representations: The Lexicon Pragmatics Interface · ACL 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › lexical ontology
wordnet |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Generating Referring Expressions in Open Domains · ACL 2004 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
constraint-based grammar |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | An Algebra for Semantic Construction in Constraint-based Grammars · ACL 2001 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Integrating Symbolic and Statistical Representations: The Lexicon Pragmatics Interface · ACL 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
evaluation · 0.4corpus evaluation · 0.0unification-based composition · 0.0probabilistic modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Morphologically Aware Word-Level TranslationabstractWe propose a novel morphologically aware probability model for bilingual lexicon induction, which jointly models lexeme translation and inflectional morphology in a structured way.Our model exploits the basic linguistic intuition that the lexeme is the key lexical unit of meaning, while inflectional morphology provides additional syntactic information.This approach leads to substantial performance improvements-19% average improvement in accuracy across 6 language pairs over the state of the art in the supervised setting and 16% in the weakly supervised setting.As another contribution, we highlight issues associated with modern BLI that stem from ignoring inflectional morphology, and propose three suggestions for improving the task. Paula Czarnowska, Sebastian Ruder, Ryan Cotterell, Ann A. Copestake |
COLING | 4 |
| 2019 | Don't Forget the Long Tail! A Comprehensive Analysis of Morphological Generalization in Bilingual Lexicon InductionabstractPaula Czarnowska, Sebastian Ruder, Edouard Grave, Ryan Cotterell, Ann Copestake. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Paula Czarnowska, Sebastian Ruder, Edouard Grave, Ryan Cotterell, Ann A. Copestake |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2017 | Realization of long sentences using chunkingabstractWe propose sentence chunking as a way to reduce the time and memory costs of realization of long sentences.During chunking we divide the semantic representation of a sentence into smaller components which can be processed and recombined without loss of information.Our meaning representation of choice is Dependency Minimal Recursion Semantics (DMRS).We show that realizing chunks of a sentence and combining the results of such realizations increases the coverage for long sentences, significantly reduces the resources required and does not affect the quality of the realization. Ewa Muszynska, Ann A. Copestake |
INLG | 2 |
| 2016 | Resources for building applications with Dependency Minimal Recursion Semantics
Ann A. Copestake, Guy Emerson, Michael Wayne Goodman, Matic Horvat, Ewa Muszynska |
LREC | 1 |
| 2014 | TagNText: A parallel corpus for the induction of resource-specific non-taxonomical relations from tagged images
Theodosia Togia, Ann A. Copestake |
LREC | 2 |
| 2013 | Interpreting compound nouns with kernel methodsabstractAbstract This paper presents a classification-based approach to noun–noun compound interpretation within the statistical learning framework of kernel methods. In this framework, the primary modelling task is to define measures of similarity between data items, formalised as kernel functions. We consider the different sources of information that are useful for understanding compounds and proceed to define kernels that compute similarity between compounds in terms of these sources. In particular, these kernels implement intuitive notions of lexical and relational similarity and can be computed using distributional information extracted from text corpora. We report performance on classification experiments with three semantic relation inventories at different levels of granularity, demonstrating in each case that combining lexical and relational information sources is beneficial and gives better performance than either source taken alone. The data used in our experiments are taken from general English text, but our methods are also applicable to other domains and potentially to other languages where noun–noun compounding is frequent and productive. Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Ann A. Copestake |
Nat. Lang. Eng. | 2 |
| 2012 | Rhetorical Move Detection in English Abstracts: Multi-label Sentence Classifiers and their Annotated Corpora
Carmen Dayrell, Arnaldo Cândido Jr., Gabriel Lima, Danilo Machado Jr., Ann A. Copestake, Valéria Delisandra Feltrim, Stella E. O. Tagnin, Sandra M. Aluísio |
LREC | 5 |
| 2009 | Slacker Semantics: Why Superficiality, Dependency and Avoidance of Commitment can be the Right Way to Go
Ann A. Copestake |
EACL | 1 |
| 2009 | Using Lexical and Relational Similarity to Classify Semantic Relations
Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Ann A. Copestake |
EACL | 2 |
| 2008 | Semantic Classification with Distributional Kernels
Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Ann A. Copestake |
COLING | 2 |
| 2008 | Language Resources and Chemical Informatics
C. J. Rupp, Ann A. Copestake, Peter T. Corbett, Peter Murray-Rust, Advaith Siddharthan, Simone Teufel, Benjamin Waldron |
LREC | 2 |
| 2008 | Cascaded classifiers for confidence-based chemical named entity recognitionabstractBACKGROUND: Chemical named entities represent an important facet of biomedical text. RESULTS: We have developed a system to use character-based n-grams, Maximum Entropy Markov Models and rescoring to recognise chemical names and other such entities, and to make confidence estimates for the extracted entities. An adjustable threshold allows the system to be tuned to high precision or high recall. At a threshold set for balanced precision and recall, we were able to extract named entities at an F score of 80.7% from chemistry papers and 83.2% from PubMed abstracts. Furthermore, we were able to achieve 57.6% and 60.3% recall at 95% precision, and 58.9% and 49.1% precision at 90% recall. CONCLUSION: These results show that chemical named entities can be extracted with good performance, and that the properties of the extraction can be tuned to suit the demands of the task. Peter T. Corbett, Ann A. Copestake |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2006 | Preprocessing and Tokenisation Standards in DELPH-IN Tools
Benjamin Waldron, Ann A. Copestake, Ulrich Schäfer 0001, Bernd Kiefer |
LREC | 2 |
| 2004 | Generating Referring Expressions in Open DomainsabstractWe present an algorithm for generating referring expressions in open domains. Existing algorithms work at the semantic level and assume the availability of a classification for attributes, which is only feasible for restricted domains. Our alternative works at the realisation level, relies on Word-Net synonym and antonym sets, and gives equivalent results on the examples cited in the literature and improved results for examples that prior approaches cannot handle. We believe that ours is also the first algorithm that allows for the incremental incorporation of relations. We present a novel corpus-evaluation using referring expressions from the Penn Wall Street Journal Treebank. Advaith Siddharthan, Ann A. Copestake |
ACL | 2 |
| 2004 | A Lexicon Module for a Grammar Development Environment
Ann A. Copestake, Fabre Lambeau, Benjamin Waldron, Francis Bond, Dan Flickinger, Stephan Oepen |
LREC | 1 |
| 2002 | Multiword Expressions: A Pain in the Neck for NLP
Ivan A. Sag, Timothy Baldwin, Francis Bond, Ann A. Copestake, Dan Flickinger |
CICLing | 4 |
| 2002 | Multiword expressions: linguistic precision and reusability
Ann A. Copestake, Fabre Lambeau, Aline Villavicencio, Francis Bond, Timothy Baldwin, Ivan A. Sag, Dan Flickinger |
LREC | 1 |
| 2001 | An Algebra for Semantic Construction in Constraint-based GrammarsabstractWe develop a framework for formalizing semantic construction within grammars expressed in typed feature structure logics, including HPSG. The approach provides an alternative to the lambda calculus; it maintains much of the desirable flexibility of unification-based approaches to composition, while constraining the allowable operations in order to capture basic generalizations and improve maintainability. Ann A. Copestake, Alex Lascarides, Dan Flickinger |
ACL | 1 |
| 2000 | An Open Source Grammar Development Environment and Broad-coverage English Grammar Using HPSG
Ann A. Copestake, Dan Flickinger |
LREC | 1 |
| 2000 | Appendix: Definitions of typed feature structures
Ann A. Copestake |
Nat. Lang. Eng. | 1 |
| 2000 | Efficient feature structure operations without compilation
Rob Malouf, John Carroll 0001, Ann A. Copestake |
Nat. Lang. Eng. | 3 |
| 1999 | Lexical Rules in Constraint-based Grammar
Ted Briscoe, Ann A. Copestake |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 1999 | Default Representation in Constraint-based Frameworks
Alex Lascarides, Ann A. Copestake |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 1997 | Integrating Symbolic and Statistical Representations: The Lexicon Pragmatics InterfaceabstractWe describe a formal framework for interpretation of words and compounds in a discourse context which integrates a symbolic lexicon/grammar, word-sense probabilities, and a pragmatic component. The approach is motivated by the need to handle productive word use. In this paper, we concentrate on compound nominals. We discuss the inadequacies of approaches which consider compund interpretation as either wholly lexico-grammatical or wholly pragmatic, and provide an alternative integrated account. Ann A. Copestake, Alex Lascarides |
ACL | 1 |
| 1990 | Enjoy the Paper: Lexicology
Ted Briscoe, Ann A. Copestake, Branimir Boguraev |
COLING | 2 |