Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raphael Hauser
dblp:73/5894 · also Raphael A. Hauser, Raphael Andreas Hauser
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-1166-5329ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 60% Algorithms and data structures · 40% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 50% Recommender systems · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 28% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering › matrix factorization
boolean matrix factorization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › large-scale optimization › decomposition methods
column generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
streaming PCA |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.4 | 2 | 2018 | PCA by Determinant Optimisation has no Spurious Local Optima · KDD 2018 A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | PCA by Determinant Optimisation has no Spurious Local Optima · KDD 2018 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
x-ray imaging |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | 3D Image Reconstruction from X-Ray Measurements with Overlap · ECCV (6) 2016 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
column generation · 1.0determinant optimization · 0.7tomographic reconstruction · 0.5mixed-integer linear programming · 0.5mixed integer linear programming · 0.5stochastic optimization · 0.4statistical analysis · 0.4minimax optimization · 0.1greedy algorithm · 0.1DC programming · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column GenerationabstractIdentifying discrete patterns in binary data is an important dimensionality reduction tool in machine learning and data mining. In this paper, we consider the problem of low-rank binary matrix factorisation (BMF) under Boolean arithmetic. Due to the hardness of this problem, most previous attempts rely on heuristic techniques. We formulate the problem as a mixed integer linear program and use a large scale optimisation technique of column generation to solve it without the need of heuristic pattern mining. Our approach focuses on accuracy and on the provision of optimality guarantees. Experimental results on real world datasets demonstrate that our proposed method is effective at producing highly accurate factorisations and improves on the previously available best known results for 15 out of 24 problem instances. Réka Kovács, Oktay Günlük, Raphael Hauser |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2020 | MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality ReductionabstractThis paper introduces Memory-limited Online Subspace Estimation Scheme (MOSES) for both estimating the principal components of streaming data and reducing its dimension. More specifically, in various applications such as sensor networks, the data vectors are presented sequentially to a user who has limited storage and processing time available. Applied to such problems, MOSES can provide a running estimate of leading principal components of the data that has arrived so far and also reduce its dimension. MOSES generalises the popular incremental Singular Vale Decomposition (iSVD) to handle thin blocks of data, rather than just vectors. This minor generalisation in part allows us to complement MOSES with a comprehensive statistical analysis, thus providing the first theoretically-sound variant of iSVD, which has been lacking despite the empirical success of this method. This generalisation also enables us to concretely interpret MOSES as an approximate solver for the underlying non-convex optimisation program. We find that MOSES consistently surpasses the state of the art in our numerical experiments with both synthetic and real-world datasets, while being computationally inexpensive. Armin Eftekhari, Raphael Hauser, Andreas Grammenos |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2018 | PCA by Determinant Optimisation has no Spurious Local OptimaabstractPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) finds the best linear representation for data and is an indispensable tool in many learning tasks. Classically, principal components of a dataset are interpreted as the directions that preserve most of its "energy", an interpretation that is theoretically underpinned by the celebrated Eckart-Young-Mirsky Theorem. There are yet other ways of interpreting PCA that are rarely exploited in practice, largely because it is not known how to reliably solve the corresponding non-convex optimisation programs. In this paper, we consider one such interpretation of principal components as the directions that preserve most of the "volume" of the dataset. Our main contribution is a theorem that shows that the corresponding non-convex program has no spurious local optima, and is therefore amenable to many convex solvers. We also confirm our findings numerically. Raphael Hauser, Armin Eftekhari, Heinrich Matzinger |
KDD | 1 |
| 2016 | 3D Image Reconstruction from X-Ray Measurements with Overlap
Maria Klodt, Raphael Hauser |
ECCV (6) | 2 |
| 2010 | Adversarial smoothed analysis
Felipe Cucker, Raphael Hauser, Martin Lotz |
J. Complex. | 2 |
| 2006 | A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selectionabstractWe address the problem of learning a kernel for a given supervised learning task. Our approach consists in searching within the convex hull of a prescribed set of basic kernels for one which minimizes a convex regularization functional. A unique feature of this approach compared to others in the literature is that the number of basic kernels can be infinite. We only require that they are continuously parameterized. For example, the basic kernels could be isotropic Gaussians with variance in a prescribed interval or even Gaussians parameterized by multiple continuous parameters. Our work builds upon a formulation involving a minimax optimization problem and a recently proposed greedy algorithm for learning the kernel. Although this optimization problem is not convex, it belongs to the larger class of DC (difference of convex functions) programs. Therefore, we apply recent results from DC optimization theory to create a new algorithm for learning the kernel. Our experimental results on benchmark data sets show that this algorithm outperforms a previously proposed method. Andreas Argyriou, Raphael Hauser, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil |
ICML | 2 |
| 2005 | Randomized Relaxation Methods for the Maximum Feasible Subsystem Problem
Edoardo Amaldi, Pietro Belotti, Raphael Hauser |
IPCO | 3 |