Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raphael Hauser

dblp:73/5894 · also Raphael A. Hauser, Raphael Andreas Hauser · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-1166-5329ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 60% Algorithms and data structures · 40%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 50% Recommender systems · 50%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 28%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering › matrix factorization
boolean matrix factorization
0.512021
Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021
Data mining
pattern mining
0.512021
Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021
Mathematical optimization › large-scale optimization › decomposition methods
column generation
0.512021
Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.512021
Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
0.512021
Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation · AAAI 2021
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction
0.412020
MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.412020
MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
streaming PCA
0.412020
MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.422018
PCA by Determinant Optimisation has no Spurious Local Optima · KDD 2018
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.312018
PCA by Determinant Optimisation has no Spurious Local Optima · KDD 2018
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
x-ray imaging
0.112016
3D Image Reconstruction from X-Ray Measurements with Overlap · ECCV (6) 2016
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.112006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel selection
0.112006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming
0.112006
A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection · ICML 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

column generation · 1.0determinant optimization · 0.7tomographic reconstruction · 0.5mixed-integer linear programming · 0.5mixed integer linear programming · 0.5stochastic optimization · 0.4statistical analysis · 0.4minimax optimization · 0.1greedy algorithm · 0.1DC programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Binary Matrix Factorisation via Column Generation
abstract
Identifying discrete patterns in binary data is an important dimensionality reduction tool in machine learning and data mining. In this paper, we consider the problem of low-rank binary matrix factorisation (BMF) under Boolean arithmetic. Due to the hardness of this problem, most previous attempts rely on heuristic techniques. We formulate the problem as a mixed integer linear program and use a large scale optimisation technique of column generation to solve it without the need of heuristic pattern mining. Our approach focuses on accuracy and on the provision of optimality guarantees. Experimental results on real world datasets demonstrate that our proposed method is effective at producing highly accurate factorisations and improves on the previously available best known results for 15 out of 24 problem instances.
Réka Kovács, Oktay Günlük, Raphael Hauser
AAAI3
2020 MOSES: A Streaming Algorithm for Linear Dimensionality Reduction
abstract
This paper introduces Memory-limited Online Subspace Estimation Scheme (MOSES) for both estimating the principal components of streaming data and reducing its dimension. More specifically, in various applications such as sensor networks, the data vectors are presented sequentially to a user who has limited storage and processing time available. Applied to such problems, MOSES can provide a running estimate of leading principal components of the data that has arrived so far and also reduce its dimension. MOSES generalises the popular incremental Singular Vale Decomposition (iSVD) to handle thin blocks of data, rather than just vectors. This minor generalisation in part allows us to complement MOSES with a comprehensive statistical analysis, thus providing the first theoretically-sound variant of iSVD, which has been lacking despite the empirical success of this method. This generalisation also enables us to concretely interpret MOSES as an approximate solver for the underlying non-convex optimisation program. We find that MOSES consistently surpasses the state of the art in our numerical experiments with both synthetic and real-world datasets, while being computationally inexpensive.
Armin Eftekhari, Raphael Hauser, Andreas Grammenos
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2018 PCA by Determinant Optimisation has no Spurious Local Optima
abstract
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) finds the best linear representation for data and is an indispensable tool in many learning tasks. Classically, principal components of a dataset are interpreted as the directions that preserve most of its "energy", an interpretation that is theoretically underpinned by the celebrated Eckart-Young-Mirsky Theorem. There are yet other ways of interpreting PCA that are rarely exploited in practice, largely because it is not known how to reliably solve the corresponding non-convex optimisation programs. In this paper, we consider one such interpretation of principal components as the directions that preserve most of the "volume" of the dataset. Our main contribution is a theorem that shows that the corresponding non-convex program has no spurious local optima, and is therefore amenable to many convex solvers. We also confirm our findings numerically.
Raphael Hauser, Armin Eftekhari, Heinrich Matzinger
KDD1
2016 3D Image Reconstruction from X-Ray Measurements with Overlap
Maria Klodt, Raphael Hauser
ECCV (6)2
2010 Adversarial smoothed analysis
Felipe Cucker, Raphael Hauser, Martin Lotz
J. Complex.2
2006 A DC-programming algorithm for kernel selection
abstract
We address the problem of learning a kernel for a given supervised learning task. Our approach consists in searching within the convex hull of a prescribed set of basic kernels for one which minimizes a convex regularization functional. A unique feature of this approach compared to others in the literature is that the number of basic kernels can be infinite. We only require that they are continuously parameterized. For example, the basic kernels could be isotropic Gaussians with variance in a prescribed interval or even Gaussians parameterized by multiple continuous parameters. Our work builds upon a formulation involving a minimax optimization problem and a recently proposed greedy algorithm for learning the kernel. Although this optimization problem is not convex, it belongs to the larger class of DC (difference of convex functions) programs. Therefore, we apply recent results from DC optimization theory to create a new algorithm for learning the kernel. Our experimental results on benchmark data sets show that this algorithm outperforms a previously proposed method.
Andreas Argyriou, Raphael Hauser, Charles A. Micchelli, Massimiliano Pontil
ICML2
2005 Randomized Relaxation Methods for the Maximum Feasible Subsystem Problem
Edoardo Amaldi, Pietro Belotti, Raphael Hauser
IPCO3