Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
T. Shanbhag
dblp:73/6237
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Network security · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.1 | 2 | 2002 | Specification-based anomaly detection: a new approach for detecting network intrusions · CCS 2002 A High-Performance Network Intrusion Detection System · CCS 1999 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection
anomaly detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Specification-based anomaly detection: a new approach for detecting network intrusions · CCS 2002 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection › anomaly detection
specification-based intrusion detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A High-Performance Network Intrusion Detection System · CCS 1999 |
Network security › attack strategy
denial-of-service attack |
0.0 | 2 | 2002 | Specification-based anomaly detection: a new approach for detecting network intrusions · CCS 2002 A High-Performance Network Intrusion Detection System · CCS 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state machine specification · 0.0protocol specification · 0.0machine learning · 0.0type checking · 0.0pattern matching · 0.0information aggregation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Specification-based anomaly detection: a new approach for detecting network intrusionsabstractUnlike signature or misuse based intrusion detection techniques, anomaly detection is capable of detecting novel attacks. However, the use of anomaly detection in practice is hampered by a high rate of false alarms. Specification-based techniques have been shown to produce a low rate of false alarms, but are not as effective as anomaly detection in detecting novel attacks, especially when it comes to network probing and denial-of-service attacks. This paper presents a new approach that combines specification-based and anomaly-based intrusion detection, mitigating the weaknesses of the two approaches while magnifying their strengths. Our approach begins with state-machine specifications of network protocols, and augments these state machines with information about statistics that need to be maintained to detect anomalies. We present a specification language in which all of this information can be captured in a succinct manner. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on the 1999 Lincoln Labs intrusion detection evaluation data, where we are able to detect all of the probing and denial-of-service attacks with a low rate of false alarms (less than 10 per day). Whereas feature selection was a crucial step that required a great deal of expertise and insight in the case of previous anomaly detection approaches, we show that the use of protocol specifications in our approach simplifies this problem. Moreover, the machine learning component of our approach is robust enough to operate without human supervision, and fast enough that no sampling techniques need to be employed. As further evidence of effectiveness, we present results of applying our approach to detect stealthy email viruses in an intranet environment. R. Sekar 0001, Ajay Gupta 0002, J. Frullo, T. Shanbhag, A. Tiwari |
CCS | 4 |
| 1999 | A High-Performance Network Intrusion Detection SystemabstractIn this paper we present a new approach for network intrusion detection based on concise specifications that characterize normal and abnormal network packet sequences. Our specification language is geared for a robust network intrusion detection by enforcing a strict type discipline via a combination of static and dynamic type checking. Unlike most previous approaches in network intrusion detection, our approach can easily support new network protocols as information relating to the protocols are not hard-coded into the system. Instead, we simply add suitable type definitions in the specifications and define intrusion patterns on these types. We compile these specifications into a high-performance network intrusion detection system. Important components of our approach include efficient algorithms for pattern-matching and information aggregation on sequences of network packets. In particular, our techniques ensure that the matching time is insensitive to the number of patterns characterizing different network intrusions, and that the aggregation operations typically take constant time per packet. Our system participated in an intrusion detection evaluation organized by MIT Lincoln Labs, where our system demonstrated its effectiveness (96% detection rate on low-level network attacks) and performance (real-time detection at 500Mbps), while producing very few false positives (0.05 to 0.1 per attack). R. Sekar 0001, Y. Guang, S. Verma, T. Shanbhag |
CCS | 4 |