Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amit Marathe
dblp:73/6838
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 62% 3D vision · 19% Face, body and person analysis · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Information retrieval · 79% Data integration and cleaning · 18% Query processing and optimization · 3% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
ordinal regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Soft Labels for Ordinal Regression · CVPR 2019 |
Information retrieval
string matching |
0.2 | 4 | 2007 | Propagating Updates in SPIDER · ICDE 2007 Using SPIDER: an experience report · SIGMOD Conference 2006 SPIDER: flexible matching in databases · SIGMOD Conference 2005 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial age estimation
age estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Soft Labels for Ordinal Regression · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Soft Labels for Ordinal Regression · CVPR 2019 |
Information retrieval › indexing › text indexing
text index |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Propagating Updates in SPIDER · ICDE 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning
approximate matching |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Merging the Results of Approximate Match Operations · VLDB 2004 |
Information retrieval › similarity search
approximate string matching |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Flexible String Matching Against Large Databases in Practice · VLDB 2004 |
Data integration and cleaning
data quality |
0.0 | 2 | 2006 | Using SPIDER: an experience report · SIGMOD Conference 2006 SPIDER: flexible matching in databases · SIGMOD Conference 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
soft probability distribution · 0.4metric penalty · 0.4cross-entropy loss · 0.4tf.idf weighting · 0.1cosine similarity · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Soft Labels for Ordinal RegressionabstractOrdinal regression attempts to solve classification problems in which categories are not independent, but rather follow a natural order. It is crucial to classify each class correctly while learning adequate interclass ordinal relationships. We present a simple and effective method that constrains these relationships among categories by seamlessly incorporating metric penalties into ground truth label representations. This encoding allows deep neural networks to automatically learn intraclass and interclass relationships without any explicit modification of the network architecture. Our method converts data labels into soft probability distributions that pair well with common categorical loss functions such as cross-entropy. We show that this approach is effective by using off-the-shelf classification and segmentation networks in four wildly different scenarios: image quality ranking, age estimation, horizon line regression, and monocular depth estimation. We demonstrate that our general-purpose method is very competitive with respect to specialized approaches, and adapts well to a variety of different network architectures and metrics. Raul Diaz, Amit Marathe |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2007 | Propagating Updates in SPIDERabstractSPIDER, developed at AT&T Labs-Research, is a system that efficiently supports flexible string matching against attribute values in large databases, and is extensively used in AT&T. The scoring methodology is based on tf.idf weighting and cosine similarity, and SPIDER maintains indexes containing string tokens and their weights, for fast matching at query time. Given the "global" nature of the weights maintained in the indexes, even a few updates to the underlying database tables would necessitate a (near-complete recomputation of the indexes, which can be prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we explore novel techniques to considerably reduce the cost of propagating updates in SPIDER, without a significant degradation of answer accuracy or query performance. We present experimental evidence using real data sets to demonstrate the practical benefits of our techniques. Nick Koudas, Amit Marathe, Divesh Srivastava |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2006 | Using SPIDER: an experience reportabstractAt AT&T Labs-Research, we have been developing a prototype system called SPIDER to efficiently support flexible string matching of attribute values in large databases. SPIDER has been used in AT&T, both as a key component of an operational portal for matching customer names and addresses, and for a variety of ad hoc data quality analyses. In this talk, we report on experiences with SPIDER. Nick Koudas, Amit Marathe, Divesh Srivastava |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2005 | SPIDER: flexible matching in databasesabstractWe present a prototype system, SPIDER, developed at AT&T Labs-Research, which supports flexible string attribute value matching in large databases. We discuss the design principles on which SPIDER is based, describe the basic techniques encompassed by the tool and provide a description of the demo. Nick Koudas, Amit Marathe, Divesh Srivastava |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2004 | Mass Collaboration: A Case Study
Raghu Ramakrishnan 0001, Andrew Baptist, Vuk Ercegovac, Matt Hanselman, Navin Kabra, Amit Marathe, Uri Shaft |
IDEAS | 6 |
| 2004 | Merging the Results of Approximate Match Operations
Sudipto Guha, Nick Koudas, Amit Marathe, Divesh Srivastava |
VLDB | 3 |
| 2004 | Flexible String Matching Against Large Databases in Practice
Nick Koudas, Amit Marathe, Divesh Srivastava |
VLDB | 2 |