Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Justus Schwartz
dblp:73/71
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Mathematical optimization · 33% Algorithms and data structures · 17% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures
load balancing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015 |
Approximation and online algorithms › max-min allocation
santa claus problem |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › scheduling under uncertainty
stochastic scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic analysis · 0.2greedy algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing TimesabstractIn this article, we consider a stochastic variant of the so-called Santa Claus problem. The Santa Claus problem is equivalent to the problem of scheduling a set of n jobs on m parallel machines without preemption, so as to maximize the minimum load. We consider the identical machine version of this scheduling problem with the additional restriction that the scheduler has only a guess of the processing times; that is, the processing time of a job is a random variable . We show that there is a critical value ρ ( n,m ) such that if the duration of the jobs is exponentially distributed and the expected values deviate by less than a multiplicative factor of ρ ( n,m ) from each other, then a greedy algorithm has an expected competitive ratio arbitrarily close to one; that is, it performs in expectation almost as good as an algorithm that knows the actual values in advance . On the other hand, if the expected values deviate by more than a multiplicative factor of ρ ( n,m ), then the expected performance is arbitrarily bad for all algorithms. Stefanie Gerke, Konstantinos Panagiotou, Justus Schwartz, Angelika Steger |
ACM Trans. Algorithms | 3 |