Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Justus Schwartz

dblp:73/71 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Mathematical optimization · 33% Algorithms and data structures · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.212015
Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015
Algorithms and data structures
load balancing
0.212015
Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.212015
Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015
Approximation and online algorithms › max-min allocation
santa claus problem
0.212015
Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015
Mathematical optimization
scheduling
0.212015
Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › scheduling under uncertainty
stochastic scheduling
0.212015
Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic analysis · 0.2greedy algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Maximizing the Minimum Load for Random Processing Times
abstract
In this article, we consider a stochastic variant of the so-called Santa Claus problem. The Santa Claus problem is equivalent to the problem of scheduling a set of n jobs on m parallel machines without preemption, so as to maximize the minimum load. We consider the identical machine version of this scheduling problem with the additional restriction that the scheduler has only a guess of the processing times; that is, the processing time of a job is a random variable . We show that there is a critical value ρ ( n,m ) such that if the duration of the jobs is exponentially distributed and the expected values deviate by less than a multiplicative factor of ρ ( n,m ) from each other, then a greedy algorithm has an expected competitive ratio arbitrarily close to one; that is, it performs in expectation almost as good as an algorithm that knows the actual values in advance . On the other hand, if the expected values deviate by more than a multiplicative factor of ρ ( n,m ), then the expected performance is arbitrarily bad for all algorithms.
Stefanie Gerke, Konstantinos Panagiotou, Justus Schwartz, Angelika Steger
ACM Trans. Algorithms3