We study a multi-leader single-follower congestion game where multiple users (leaders) choose one resource out of a set of resources and, after observing the realized loads, an adversary (single-follower) attacks the resources with maximum loads causing additional costs for the leaders. For the resulting strategic game among the leaders, we show that pure Nash equilibria fail to exist and therefore, we consider approximate equilibria instead. As our first main result, we show that the existence of a K-approximate equilibrium can always be guaranteed, where K (approximately equal to 1.1974) is the unique solution of a cubic polynomial equation. To this end, we give a polynomial time combinatorial algorithm which computes a K-approximate equilibrium. The factor K is tight, meaning that there is an instance that does not admit an A-approximate equilibrium for any A < K. Thus A = K is the smallest possible value of A such that the existence of an A-approximate equilibrium can be guaranteed for any instance of the considered game. Secondly, we focus on approximate equilibria of a given fixed instance. We show how to compute efficiently a best approximate equilibrium, that is, with smallest possible A among all A-approximate equilibria of the given instance.

We consider a matching problem in a bipartite graph G = (A∪B, E) where each node in A is an agent having preferences in partial order over her neighbors, while nodes in B are objects with no preferences. The size of our matching is more important than node preferences–thus, we are interested in maximum matchings only. Any pair of maximum matchings in G (equivalently, perfect matchings or assignments) can be compared by holding a head-to-head election between them where agents are voters. The goal is to compute an assignment such that there is no better or “more popular” assignment. This is the popular assignment problem and it generalizes the well-studied popular matching problem (Abraham et al., 2007). Popular assignments need not exist in every input instance. We show a polynomial-time algorithm that decides if the given instance admits one or not, and computes one, if so. In instances with no popular assignment, we consider the problem of finding an almost popular assignment, i.e., an assignment with minimum unpopularity margin. We show an O∗ (|E|k) time algorithm for deciding if there exists an assignment with unpopularity margin at most k. We then show that this algorithm is essentially optimal by proving that the problem is NP-complete and Wl[1]-hard with parameter k. We also consider the minimum-cost popular assignment problem when there are edge costs, and show this problem to be NP-hard. This hardness holds even when all edge costs are in {0,1} and agents have strict preferences. By contrast, we propose a polynomial-time algorithm to the problem of deciding if there exists a popular assignment with a given set of forced/forbidden edges (this tractability holds even for partially ordered preferences). Our algorithms are combinatorial and based on LP duality. They search for an appropriate witness or dual certificate, and when a certificate cannot be found, we prove that the desired assignment does not exist in G.

Suppose a target is hidden in one of the vertices of an edge-weighted graph according to a known probability distribution. Starting from a fixed root node, an expanding search visits the vertices sequentially until it finds the target, where the next vertex can be reached from any of the previously visited vertices. That is, the time to reach the next vertex equals the shortest-path distance from the set of all previously visited vertices. The expanding search problem then asks for a sequence of the nodes, so as to minimize the expected time to finding the target. This problem has numerous applications, such as searching for hidden explosives, mining coal, and disaster relief. In this paper, we develop exact algorithms and heuristics, including a branch-and-cut procedure, a greedy algorithm with a constant-factor approximation guarantee, and a local search procedure based on a spanning-tree neighborhood. Computational experiments show that our branch-and-cut procedure outperforms existing methods for instances with nonuniform probability distributions and that both our heuristics compute near-optimal solutions with little computational effort. Summary of Contribution: This paper studies new algorithms for the expanding search problem, which asks to search a graph for a target hidden in one of the nodes according to a known probability distribution. This problem has applications such as searching for hidden explosives, mining coal, and disaster relief. We propose several new algorithms, including a branch-and-cut procedure, a greedy algorithm, and a local search procedure; and we analyze their performance both experimentally and theoretically. Our analysis shows that the algorithms improve on the performance of existing methods and establishes the first constant-factor approximation guarantee for this problem.

This paper studies the existence of pure Nash equilibria in resource graph games, a general class of strategic games succinctly representing the players’ private costs. These games are defined relative to a finite set of resources and the strategy set of each player corresponds to a set of subsets of resources. The cost of a resource is an arbitrary function of the load vector of a certain subset of resources. As our main result, we give complete characterizations of the cost functions guaranteeing the existence of pure Nash equilibria for weighted and unweighted players, respectively. For unweighted players, pure Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist for any choice of the players’ strategy space if and only if the cost of each resource is an arbitrary function of the load of the resource itself and linear in the load of all other resources where the linear coefficients of mutual influence of different resources are symmetric. This implies in particular that for any other cost structure there is a resource graph game that does not have a pure Nash equilibrium. For weighted games where players have intrinsic weights and the cost of each resource depends on the aggregated weight of its users, pure Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist if and only if the cost of a resource is linear in all resource loads, and the linear factors of mutual influence are symmetric, or there is no interaction among resources and the cost is an exponential function of the local resource load. We further discuss the computational complexity of pure Nash equilibria in resource graph games showing that for unweighted games where pure Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist, it is coNP-complete to decide for a given strategy profile whether it is a pure Nash equilibrium. For general resource graph games, we prove that the decision whether a pure Nash equilibrium exists is Σ p 2 -complete.

Abstract LetGbe a digraph where every node has preferences over its incoming edges. The preferences of a node extend naturally to preferences overbranchings, i.e., directed forests; a branchingBispopularifBdoes not lose a head-to-head election (where nodes cast votes) against any branching. Such popular branchings have a natural application in liquid democracy. The popular branching problem is to decide ifGadmits a popular branching or not. We give a characterization of popular branchings in terms ofdual certificatesand use this characterization to design an efficient combinatorial algorithm for the popular branching problem. When preferences are weak rankings, we use our characterization to formulate thepopular branching polytopein the original space and also show that our algorithm can be modified to compute a branching withleast unpopularity margin. When preferences are strict rankings, we show that “approximately popular” branchings always exist.

We introduce reroutable flows, a robust version of network flows in which link failures can be mitigated by rerouting the affected flow. An important new feature of this model, distinguishing it from existing robust network flow models, is that no flow can get lost in the network. Our goal is to compute maximum flows under this robustness requirement. We investigate different variants depending on the number of failing links, the capacities available for rerouting, and integrality requirements. While the most general versions of the model turn out to be $NP$-hard, we devise linear programming (LP) formulations and combinatorial algorithms for important special cases and provide approximation algorithms for the harder variants.

The min-cost matching problem suffers from being very sensitive to small changes of the input. Even in a simple setting, e.g., when the costs come from the metric on the line, adding two nodes to the input might change the optimal solution completely. On the other hand, one expects that small changes in the input should incur only small changes on the constructed solutions, measured as the number of modified edges. We introduce a two-stage model where we study the trade-off between quality and robustness of solutions. In the first stage we are given a set of nodes in a metric space and we must compute a perfect matching. In the second stage $2k$ new nodes appear and we must adapt the solution to a perfect matching for the new instance. We say that an algorithm is $(α,β)$-robust if the solutions constructed in both stages are $α$-approximate with respect to min-cost perfect matchings, and if the number of edges deleted from the first stage matching is at most $βk$. Hence, $α$ measures the quality of the algorithm and $β$ its robustness. In this setting we aim to balance both measures by deriving algorithms for constant $α$ and $β$. We show that there exists an algorithm that is $(3,1)$-robust for any metric if one knows the number $2k$ of arriving nodes in advance. For the case that $k$ is unknown the situation is significantly more involved. We study this setting under the metric on the line and devise a $(10,2)$-robust algorithm that constructs a solution with a recursive structure that carefully balances cost and redundancy.

In the Steiner Forest problem, we are given a graph and a collection of source-sink pairs, and the goal is to find a subgraph of minimum total length such that all pairs are connected. The problem is APX-Hard and can be 2-approximated by, e.g., the elegant primal-dual algorithm of Agrawal, Klein, and Ravi from 1995. We give a local-search-based constant-factor approximation for the problem. Local search brings in new techniques to an area that has for long not seen any improvements and might be a step towards a combinatorial algorithm for the more general survivable network design problem. Moreover, local search was an essential tool to tackle the dynamic MST/Steiner Tree problem, whereas dynamic Steiner Forest is still wide open. It is easy to see that any constant factor local search algorithm requires steps that add/drop many edges together. We propose natural local moves which, at each step, either (a) add a shortest path in the current graph and then drop a bunch of inessential edges, or (b) add a set of edges to the current solution. This second type of moves is motivated by the potential function we use to measure progress, combining the cost of the solution with a penalty for each connected component. Our carefully-chosen local moves and potential function work in tandem to eliminate bad local minima that arise when using more traditional local moves. Our analysis first considers the case where the local optimum is a single tree, and shows optimality w.r.t. moves that add a single edge (and drop a set of edges) is enough to bound the locality gap. For the general case, we show how to "project" the optimal solution onto the different trees of the local optimum without incurring too much cost (and this argument uses optimality w.r.t. both kinds of moves), followed by a tree-by-tree argument. We hope both the potential function, and our analysis techniques will be useful to develop and analyze local-search algorithms in other contexts.

We study a natural generalization of the maximum weight many-to-one matching problem. We are given an undirected bipartite graph $$G= (A\, \dot{\cup }\, P, E)$$ with weights on the edges in E, and with lower and upper quotas on the vertices in P. We seek a maximum weight many-to-one matching satisfying two sets of constraints: vertices in A are incident to at most one matching edge, while vertices in P are either unmatched or they are incident to a number of matching edges between their lower and upper quota. This problem, which we call maximum weight many-to-one matching with lower and upper quotas (WMLQ), has applications to the assignment of students to projects within university courses, where there are constraints on the minimum and maximum numbers of students that must be assigned to each project. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the complexity of WMLQ from the viewpoints of classical polynomial time algorithms, fixed-parameter tractability, as well as approximability. We draw the line between $$\textsf {NP}$$ -hard and polynomially tractable instances in terms of degree and quota constraints and provide efficient algorithms to solve the tractable ones. We further show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time for instances with bounded treewidth; however, the corresponding runtime is exponential in the treewidth with the maximum upper quota $$u_{\max }$$ as basis, and we prove that this dependence is necessary unless $$\textsf {FPT}= \textsf {W}[1]$$ . The approximability of WMLQ is also discussed: we present an approximation algorithm for the general case with performance guarantee $$u_{\max }+1$$ , which is asymptotically best possible unless $$\textsf {P}= \textsf {NP}$$ . Finally, we elaborate on how most of our positive results carry over to matchings in arbitrary graphs with lower quotas.

We study a natural generalization of the maximum weight many-to-one matching problem. We are given an undirected bipartite graph $$G= (A \dot{\cup }P, E)$$ with weights on the edges in E, and with lower and upper quotas on the vertices in P. We seek a maximum weight many-to-one matching satisfying two sets of constraints: vertices in A are incident to at most one matching edge, while vertices in P are either unmatched or they are incident to a number of matching edges between their lower and upper quota. This problem, which we call maximum weight many-to-one matching with lower and upper quotas (wmlq), has applications to the assignment of students to projects within university courses, where there are constraints on the minimum and maximum numbers of students that must be assigned to each project. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the complexity of wmlq from the viewpoints of classic polynomial time algorithms, fixed-parameter tractability, as well as approximability. We draw the line between $$\mathsf{NP}$$ -hard and polynomially tractable instances in terms of degree and quota constraints and provide efficient algorithms to solve the tractable ones. We further show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time for instances with bounded treewidth; however, the corresponding runtime is exponential in the treewidth with the maximum upper quota $$u_{\max }$$ as basis, and we prove that this dependence is necessary unless $$\mathsf{FPT}= \mathsf{W}[1]$$ . Finally, we also present an approximation algorithm for the general case with performance guarantee $$u_{\max }+1$$ , which is asymptotically best possible unless $$\mathsf{P}= \mathsf{NP}$$ .

The following zero-sum game is played on a weighted graph G: Alice selects a matching M in G and Bob selects a number k. Then, Alice receives a payoff equal to the ratio of the weight of the top k edges of M to optk, which is the maximum weight of a matching of size at most k in G. If M guarantees a payoff of at least α then it is called α-robust. In 2002, Hassin and Rubinstein gave an algorithm that returns a -robust matching, which is best possible for this setting. In this paper, we show that Alice can improve on the guarantee of when allowing her to play a randomized strategy. For this setting, we devise a simple algorithm that returns a 1/ln(4)-robust randomized matching. The algorithm is based on the following non-trivial observation: If all edge weights are integer powers of 2, then any lexicographically optimum matching is 1-robust. We prove this property not only for matchings but for any independence system in which optk is a concave function of k. This class of systems includes matroid intersection, b-matchings, and strong 2-exchange systems. We also show that our robustness results for randomized matchings translate to an asymptotic robustness guarantee for deterministic matchings: When restricting Bob's choice to cardinalities larger than a given constant, then Alice can find a single deterministic matching with approximately the same guaranteed payoff as in the randomized setting. In addition to the above results, we also give a new simple LP-based proof of Hassin and Rubinstein's original result.

In this paper, we study a multi-dimensional commodity covering problem, which we encountered as a subproblem in optimizing large scale transportation networks in logistics. The problem asks for a selection of containers for transporting a given set of commodities, each commodity having different extensions of properties such as weight or volume. Each container can be selected multiple times and is specified by a fixed charge and capacities in the relevant properties. The task is to find a cost minimal collection of containers and a feasible assignment of the demand to all selected containers. From theoretical point of view, by exploring similarities to the well known SetCover problem, we derive NP-hardness and see that the non-approximability result known for set cover also carries over to our problem. For practical applications we need very fast heuristics to be integrated into a meta-heuristic framework that - depending on the context - either provide feasible near optimal solutions or only estimate the cost value of an optimal solution. We develop and analyze a flexible family of greedy algorithms that meet these challenges. In order to find best-performing configurations for different requirements of the meta-heuristic framework, we provide an extensive computational study on random and real world instance sets obtained from our project partner 4flow AG. We outline a trade-off between running times and solution quality and conclude that the proposed methods achieve the accuracy and efficiency necessary for serving as a key ingredient in more complex meta-heuristics enabling the optimization of large-scale networks.