Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jose Romero-Mariona

dblp:74/2334 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 55% Software testing · 45%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › non-functional requirements
security requirements
0.222010
ASSURE: automated support for secure and usable requirements engineering · ISSTA 2010
Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering · ASE 2009
Software testing › specification-based testing
requirements-based testing
0.112010
ASSURE: automated support for secure and usable requirements engineering · ISSTA 2010
Software testing
test generation
0.112010
ASSURE: automated support for secure and usable requirements engineering · ISSTA 2010
Systems and software security › security engineering
security requirements specification
0.012010
ASSURE: automated support for secure and usable requirements engineering · ISSTA 2010
Software testing
test artifact generation
0.012009
Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering · ASE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

requirements engineering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Return on Cybersecurity Investment in Operational Technology Systems: Quantifying the Value That Cybersecurity Technologies Provide after Integration
Roger Hallman, Maxine Major, Jose Romero-Mariona, Richard Phipps, Esperanza Romero, John San Miguel
COMPLEXIS3
2020 Decepti-SCADA: A Framework for Actively Defending Networked Critical Infrastructures
Nicholas Cifranic, Jose Romero-Mariona, Brian Souza, Roger Hallman
IoTBDS2
2017 IoDDoS - The Internet of Distributed Denial of Sevice Attacks - A Case Study of the Mirai Malware and IoT-Based Botnets
Roger Hallman, Josiah Bryan, Geancarlo Palavicini, Joseph DiVita, Jose Romero-Mariona
IoTBDS5
2010 ASSURE: automated support for secure and usable requirements engineering
abstract
Proper testing is an essential and critical part of any development effort. However, software testing is a complex undertaking, especially in the midst of today's security threats. Hackers, social engineering scams, and unaware users, are just a few potential threats that developers must consider not only during development, but more importantly during testing. There are significant reputation and financial losses related to security aspects that could have been addressed during requirements specification. While a variety of approaches to security requirements specification have been proposed, there is a tangible lack in the support that they offer during testing. In this paper we describe the tool support of a new security requirements engineering technique called SURE-Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering. ASSURE - Automated Support for Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering -, is a system developed to aid in the mapping of security requirements into testing artifacts. This support goes beyond mapping and aids also in the management of users and projects.
Jose Romero-Mariona, Hadar Ziv, Debra J. Richardson
ISSTA1
2009 Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering
abstract
Software security is an increasingly important aspect of computing; however, it is still addressed as an after thought in too many development efforts. While a variety of approaches have been proposed for security requirements engineering, we find many still lacking with respect to their usability. In this proposal I describe my work in the area of security requirements engineering. SURE, Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering, is a new approach that supports non-security experts in order to specify security requirements from which testing artifacts can be derived. In addition, ASSURE, Automated Support for Secure and Usable Requirements Engineering, a system that implements the SURE technique is presented.
Jose Romero-Mariona
ASE1
2007 CCARCH: Architecting Common Criteria Security Requirements
abstract
As technology continues to evolve, so do different entities that threaten the security of this technology. We believe that in order to build dependable software security should be treated just as any other important aspect of a system; to do this we must emphasize it at the beginning of our development cycle and be able to carry these security requirements down the cycle. We focus on a technique known as the Common Criteria, which allows for the development of security requirements. We extend the capabilities of Common Criteria beyond the requirements phase, to allow us to take security requirements into further stages of the cycle. In this paper we describe CCARCH, a technique accompanied by a set of tools, that takes Common Criteria expressed security requirements to the architectural level. Our approach aids in making the usage of Common Criteria more beneficial and applicable.
Jose Romero-Mariona, Hadar Ziv, Debra J. Richardson
IAS1