Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuying Li 0001
dblp:74/3697-1
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-9423-7313ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 67% Information retrieval · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 90% Optimization for machine learning · 10% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
frank-wolfe algorithm |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Solving Separable Nonsmooth Problems Using Frank-Wolfe with Uniform Affine Approximations · IJCAI 2018 Projection Free Rank-Drop Steps · IJCAI 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
projection-free optimization |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Solving Separable Nonsmooth Problems Using Frank-Wolfe with Uniform Affine Approximations · IJCAI 2018 Projection Free Rank-Drop Steps · IJCAI 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Solving Separable Nonsmooth Problems Using Frank-Wolfe with Uniform Affine Approximations · IJCAI 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Projection Free Rank-Drop Steps · IJCAI 2017 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › imbalanced classification
rare class classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Hierarchical Double Dirichlet Process Mixture of Gaussian Processes · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Hierarchical Double Dirichlet Process Mixture of Gaussian Processes · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
hierarchical dirichlet process |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Hierarchical Double Dirichlet Process Mixture of Gaussian Processes · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
mixture of gaussian processes |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Hierarchical Double Dirichlet Process Mixture of Gaussian Processes · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized risk minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A computational algorithm for minimizing total variation in image restoration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1996 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A computational algorithm for minimizing total variation in image restoration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1996 |
Image and video processing › regularization
total variation regularization |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A computational algorithm for minimizing total variation in image restoration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularized loss minimization · 0.4kernel methods · 0.4AUC optimization · 0.4uniform affine approximations · 0.3rank-drop steps · 0.3hierarchical model · 0.1dirichlet process · 0.1steepest descent · 0.0conjugate gradient · 0.0affine scaling newton method · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Solving Separable Nonsmooth Problems Using Frank-Wolfe with Uniform Affine ApproximationsabstractFrank-Wolfe methods (FW) have gained significant interest in the machine learning community due to their ability to efficiently solve large problems that admit a sparse structure (e.g. sparse vectors and low-rank matrices). However the performance of the existing FW method hinges on the quality of the linear approximation. This typically restricts FW to smooth functions for which the approximation quality, indicated by a global curvature measure, is reasonably good. In this paper, we propose a modified FW algorithm amenable to nonsmooth functions, subject to a separability assumption, by optimizing for approximation quality over all affine functions, given a neighborhood of interest. We analyze theoretical properties of the proposed algorithm and demonstrate that it overcomes many issues associated with existing methods in the context of nonsmooth low-rank matrix estimation. Edward Cheung, Yuying Li 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Bounding the difference between RankRC and RankSVM and application to multi-level rare class kernel ranking
Aditya Tayal, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001 |
Data Min. Knowl. Discov. | 3 |
| 2017 | Projection Free Rank-Drop StepsabstractThe Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithm has been widely used in solving nuclear norm constrained problems, since it does not require projections. However, FW often yields high rank intermediate iterates, which can be very expensive in time and space costs for large problems. To address this issue, we propose a rank-drop method for nuclear norm constrained problems. The goal is to generate descent steps that lead to rank decreases, maintaining low-rank solutions throughout the algorithm. Moreover, the optimization problems are constrained to ensure that the rank-drop step is also feasible and can be readily incorporated into a projection-free minimization method, e.g., Frank-Wolfe. We demonstrate that by incorporating rank-drop steps into the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, the rank of the solution is greatly reduced compared to the original Frank-Wolfe or its common variants. Edward Cheung, Yuying Li 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2017 | Self-training with adaptive regularization for S3VMabstractThe Semi-Supervised Support Vector Machine (S3VM) solves a non-convex, Mixed-Integer Program (MIP). Due to difficulty in solving the problem, convex approximations have typically been used. However, existing approaches suffer from poor scalability and struggle on certain datasets, compared to graph based counterparts. The poor predictive performance suggests that for some datasets, convex approximations may not be a sufficiently accurate approximation to the problem. We present a self-training approach with self-adapting regularization parameters for S3VM formulations. At each iteration, the regularization parameters are adapted to better reflect label confidence, class proportion, and to gradually include more unlabeled points. We show that updating the S3VM framework iteratively in this fashion, the sequence of SVM subproblems can be solved very efficiently and the solution generated by this sequence yields superior performance compared to leading SSL methods. Edward Cheung, Yuying Li 0001 |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 2015 | RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class RankingabstractRare class problems are common in real-world applications across a wide range of domains. Standard classification algorithms are known to perform poorly in these cases, since they focus on overall classification accuracy. In addition, we have seen a significant increase of data in recent years, resulting in many large scale rare class problems. In this paper, we focus on nonlinear kernel based classification methods expressed as a regularized loss minimization problem. We address the challenges associated with both rare class problems and large scale learning, by 1) optimizing area under curve of the receiver of operator characteristic in the training process, instead of classification accuracy and 2) using a rare class kernel representation to achieve an efficient time and space algorithm. We call the algorithm RankRC. We provide justifications for the rare class representation and experimentally illustrate the effectiveness of RankRC in test performance, computational complexity, and model robustness. Aditya Tayal, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 3 |
| 2014 | Primal explicit max margin feature selection for nonlinear support vector machines
Aditya Tayal, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001 |
Pattern Recognit. | 3 |
| 2012 | Hierarchical Double Dirichlet Process Mixture of Gaussian ProcessesabstractWe consider an infinite mixture model of Gaussian processes that share mixture components between non-local clusters in data. Meeds and Osindero (2006) use a single Dirichlet process prior to specify a mixture of Gaussian processes using an infinite number of experts. In this paper, we extend this approach to allow for experts to be shared non-locally across the input domain. This is accomplished with a hierarchical double Dirichlet process prior, which builds upon a standard hierarchical Dirichlet process by incorporating local parameters that are unique to each cluster while sharing mixture components between them. We evaluate the model on simulated and real data, showing that sharing Gaussian process components non-locally can yield effective and useful models for richly clustered non-stationary, non-linear data. Aditya Tayal, Pascal Poupart, Yuying Li 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2003 | Hedging a portfolio of derivatives by modeling costabstractWe consider the problem of hedging the loss of a given portfolio of derivatives using a set of more liquid derivative instruments. We illustrate why the typical mathematical formulation for this hedging problem is ill-posed. We propose to determine a hedging portfolio by minimizing a proportional cost subject to an upper bound on the hedge risk; this bound is typically slightly larger than the optimal hedge risk achievable without cost consideration. We illustrate that the optimal hedging portfolio obtained by the proposed method is attractive since it consists of fewer instruments with a comparable risk. Finally we illustrate the importance of modeling volatility uncertainty in hedge risk minimization. Katharyn A. Boyle, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001 |
CIFEr | 3 |
| 1996 | A computational algorithm for minimizing total variation in image restorationabstractA reliable and efficient computational algorithm for restoring blurred and noisy images is proposed. The restoration process is based on the minimal total variation principle introduced by Rudin et al. For discrete images, the proposed algorithm minimizes a piecewise linear l (1) function (a measure of total variation) subject to a single 2-norm inequality constraint (a measure of data fit). The algorithm starts by finding a feasible point for the inequality constraint using a (partial) conjugate gradient method. This corresponds to a deblurring process. Noise and other artifacts are removed by a subsequent total variation minimization process. The use of the linear l(1) objective function for the total variation measurement leads to a simpler computational algorithm. Both the steepest descent and an affine scaling Newton method are considered to solve this constrained piecewise linear l(1) minimization problem. The resulting algorithm, when viewed as an image restoration and enhancement process, has the feature that it can be used in an adaptive/interactive manner in situations when knowledge of the noise variance is either unavailable or unreliable. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed iterative image restoration and enhancement process. Yuying Li 0001, Fadil Santosa |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |