Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bernie J. Daigle Jr.
dblp:74/7103
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 11 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | icHET: interactive visualization of cytoplasmic heteroplasmy · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Inferring single-cell gene expression mechanisms using stochastic simulation · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Cure Time Model for Joint Prediction of Outcome and Time-to-Outcome · ICDM 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Inferring single-cell gene expression mechanisms using stochastic simulation · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
short read sequencing analysis · 0.4computational workflow · 0.4monte carlo expectation-maximization · 0.2model reduction · 0.2logistic regression · 0.2joint log-odds ratio · 0.2cross-entropy method · 0.2cox model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | GEOlimma: differential expression analysis and feature selection using pre-existing microarray dataabstractBACKGROUND: Differential expression and feature selection analyses are essential steps for the development of accurate diagnostic/prognostic classifiers of complicated human diseases using transcriptomics data. These steps are particularly challenging due to the curse of dimensionality and the presence of technical and biological noise. A promising strategy for overcoming these challenges is the incorporation of pre-existing transcriptomics data in the identification of differentially expressed (DE) genes. This approach has the potential to improve the quality of selected genes, increase classification performance, and enhance biological interpretability. While a number of methods have been developed that use pre-existing data for differential expression analysis, existing methods do not leverage the identities of experimental conditions to create a robust metric for identifying DE genes. RESULTS: In this study, we propose a novel differential expression and feature selection method-GEOlimma-which combines pre-existing microarray data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with the widely-applied Limma method for differential expression analysis. We first quantify differential gene expression across 2481 pairwise comparisons from 602 curated GEO Datasets, and we convert differential expression frequencies to DE prior probabilities. Genes with high DE prior probabilities show enrichment in cell growth and death, signal transduction, and cancer-related biological pathways, while genes with low prior probabilities were enriched in sensory system pathways. We then applied GEOlimma to four differential expression comparisons within two human disease datasets and performed differential expression, feature selection, and supervised classification analyses. Our results suggest that use of GEOlimma provides greater experimental power to detect DE genes compared to Limma, due to its increased effective sample size. Furthermore, in a supervised classification analysis using GEOlimma as a feature selection method, we observed similar or better classification performance than Limma given small, noisy subsets of an asthma dataset. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that GEOlimma is a more effective method for differential gene expression and feature selection analyses compared to the standard Limma method. Due to its focus on gene-level differential expression, GEOlimma also has the potential to be applied to other high-throughput biological datasets. Liangqun Lu, Kevin A. Townsend, Bernie J. Daigle Jr. |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2019 | icHET: interactive visualization of cytoplasmic heteroplasmyabstractSUMMARY: Although heteroplasmy has been studied extensively in animal systems, there is a lack of tools for analyzing, exploring and visualizing heteroplasmy at the genome-wide level in other taxonomic systems. We introduce icHET, which is a computational workflow that produces an interactive visualization that facilitates the exploration, analysis and discovery of heteroplasmy across multiple genomic samples. icHET works on short reads from multiple samples from any organism with an organellar reference genome (mitochondrial or plastid) and a nuclear reference genome. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/vtphan/HeteroplasmyWorkflow. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Vinhthuy T. Phan, Diem-Trang Pham, Caroline Melton, Adam J. Ramsey, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Jennifer R. Mandel |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2017 | Proceedings of the 16th Annual UT-KBRIN Bioinformatics Summit 2016: bioinformatics: Burns, TN, USA. April 21-23, 2017abstractMemphis, Tennessee Eric C. Rouchka, Julia H. Chariker, David Tieri, Juw Won Park, Shreedharkumar D. Rajurkar, Nishchal K. Verma, Yan Cui 0001, Mark L. Farman, Bradford Condon, Neil Moore, Jerzy W. Jaromczyk, Jolanta Jaromczyk, Daniel R. Harris, Patrick Calie, Eun Kyong Shin, Robert L. Davis, Arash Shaban-Nejad, Joshua M. Mitchell, Robert M. Flight, Qing Jun Wang, Richard M. Higashi, Teresa W.-M. Fan, Andrew N. Lane, Hunter N. B. Moseley, Liangqun Lu, Bernie J. Daigle, Andrey Smelter, Bailey K. Phan, Nathaniel J. Serpico, Ethan G. Toney, Caroline E. Melton, Jennifer R. Mandel, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Kazi I. Zaman, Ramin Homayouni, Patrick J. Trainor, Samantha M. Carlisle, Andrew P. DeFilippis, Shesh N. Rai |
BMC Bioinform. | 36 |
| 2016 | Proceedings of the 15th Annual UT-KBRIN Bioinformatics Summit 2016: Cadiz, KY, USA. 8-10 April 2016abstractI1 Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual UT- KBRIN Bioinformatics Summit 2016 Eric C. Rouchka, Julia H. Chariker, Benjamin J. Harrison, Juw Won Park P1 CC-PROMISE: Projection onto the Most Interesting Statistical Evidence (PROMISE) with Canonical Correlation to integrate gene expression and methylation data with multiple pharmacologic and clinical endpoints Xueyuan Cao, Stanley Pounds, Susana Raimondi, James Downing, Raul Ribeiro, Jeffery Rubnitz, Jatinder Lamba P2 Integration of microRNA-mRNA interaction networks with gene expression data to increase experimental power Bernie J Daigle, Jr. P3 Designing and writing software for in silico subtractive hybridization of large eukaryotic genomes Deborah Burgess, Stephanie Gehrlich, John C Carmen P4 Tracking the molecular evolution of Pax gene Nicholas Johnson; Chandrakanth Emani P5 Identifying genetic differences in thermally dimorphic and state specific fungi using in silico genomic comparison Stephanie Gehrlich, Deborah Burgess, John C Carmen P6 Identification of conserved genomic regions and variation therein amongst Cetartiodactyla species using next generation sequencing Kalpani De Silva, Michael P Heaton, Theodore S Kalbfleisch P7 Mining physiological data to identify patients with similar medical events and phenotypes Teeradache Viangteeravat, Rahul Mudunuri, Oluwaseun Ajayi, Fatih Şen, Eunice Y Huang P8 Smart brief for home health monitoring Mohammad Mohebbi, Luaire Florian, Douglas J Jackson, John F Naber P9 Side-effect term matching for computational adverse drug reaction predictions AKM Sabbir, Sally R Ellingson P10 Enrichment vs robustness: A comparison of transcriptomic data clustering metrics Yuping Lu, Charles A Phillips, Michael A Langston P11 Deep neural networks for transcriptome-based cancer classification Rahul K Sevakula, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Nishchal K. Verma, Yan Cui P12 Motif discovery using K-means clustering Mohammed Sayed, Juw Won Park P13 Large scale discovery of active enhancers from nascent RNA sequencing Jing Wang, Qi Liu, Yu Shyr P14 Computationally characterizing genomic pipelines and benchmarking results using GATK best practices on the high performance computing cluster at the University of Kentucky Xiaofei Zhang, Sally R Ellingson P15 Development of approaches enabling the identification of abnormal gene expression from RNA-Seq in personalized oncology Naresh Prodduturi, Gavin R Oliver, Diane Grill, Jie Na, Jeanette Eckel-Passow, Eric W Klee P16 Processing RNA-Seq data of plants infected with coffee ringspot virus Michael M Goodin, Mark Farman, Harrison Inocencio, Chanyong Jang, Jerzy W Jaromczyk, Neil Moore, Kelly Sovacool P17 Comparative transcriptomics of three Acinetobacter baumanii clinical isolates with different antibiotic resistance patterns Leon Dent, Mike Izban, Sammed Mandape, Shruti Sakhare, Siddharth Pratap, Dana Marshall P18 Metagenomic assessment of possible microbial contamination in the equine reference genome assembly M Scotty DePriest, James N MacLeod, Theodore S Kalbfleisch P19 Molecular evolution of cancer driver genes Chandrakanth Emani, Hanady Adam, Ethan Blandford, Joel Campbell, Joshua Castlen, Brittany Dixon, Ginger Gilbert, Aaron Hall, Philip Kreisle, Jessica Lasher, Bethany Oakes, Allison Speer, Maximilian Valentine P20 Biorepository Laboratory Information Management System Naga Satya V Rao Nagisetty, Rony Jose, Teeradache Viangteeravat, Robert Rooney, David Hains Eric C. Rouchka, Julia H. Chariker, Benjamin J. Harrison, Juw Won Park, Xueyuan Cao, Stan Pounds, Susana C. Raimondi, James R. Downing, Raul C. Ribeiro, Jeffrey Rubnitz, Jatinder Lamba, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Deborah Burgess, Stephanie Gehrlich, John C. Carmen, Chandrakanth Emani, Kalpani De Silva, Michael P. Heaton, Ted Kalbfleisch, Teeradache Viangteeravat, Rahul Mudunuri, Oluwaseun Ajayi, Fatih Sen, Eunice Y. Huang, Mohammad Mohebbi, Luaire Florian, Douglas J. Jackson, John F. Naber, Akm Sabbir, Sally R. Ellingson, Yuping Lu, Charles A. Phillips, Michael A. Langston, Rahul Kumar Sevakula, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Nishchal K. Verma, Yan Cui 0001, Mohammed Sayed, Jing Wang 0026, Qi Liu 0024, Shyr Yu, Naresh Prodduturi, Gavin R. Oliver, Diane Grill, Jie Na, Jeanette Eckel-Passow, Eric W. Klee, Michael M. Goodin, Mark L. Farman, Harrison Inocencio, Chanyong Jang, Jerzy W. Jaromczyk, Neil Moore, Kelly L. Sovacool, Leon Dent, Mike Izban, Sammed N. Mandape, Shruti S. Sakhare, Siddharth Pratap, Dana Marshall, M. Scotty Depriest, James N. MacLeod, Hanady Adam, Ethan Blandford, Joel Campbell, Joshua Castlen, Brittany Dixon, Ginger Gilbert, Aaron Hall, Philip Kreisle, Jessica Lasher, Bethany Oakes, Allison Speer, Maximilian Valentine, Naga Satya Venkateswara Ra Nagisetty, Rony Jose, Robert W. Rooney, David Hains |
BMC Bioinform. | 12 |
| 2016 | Stochastic Simulation Service: Bridging the Gap between the Computational Expert and the BiologistabstractWe present StochSS: Stochastic Simulation as a Service, an integrated development environment for modeling and simulation of both deterministic and discrete stochastic biochemical systems in up to three dimensions. An easy to use graphical user interface enables researchers to quickly develop and simulate a biological model on a desktop or laptop, which can then be expanded to incorporate increasing levels of complexity. StochSS features state-of-the-art simulation engines. As the demand for computational power increases, StochSS can seamlessly scale computing resources in the cloud. In addition, StochSS can be deployed as a multi-user software environment where collaborators share computational resources and exchange models via a public model repository. We demonstrate the capabilities and ease of use of StochSS with an example of model development and simulation at increasing levels of complexity. Brian Drawert, Andreas Hellander, Benjamin B. Bales, Debjani Banerjee, Giovanni Bellesia, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Geoffrey Douglas, Mengyuan Gu, Anand Gupta, Stefan Hellander, Christopher B. Horuk, Dibyendu Nath, Aviral Takkar, Sheng Wu 0002, Per Lötstedt, Chandra Krintz, Linda R. Petzold |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2015 | A Cure Time Model for Joint Prediction of Outcome and Time-to-OutcomeabstractThe Cox model has been widely used in time-to-outcome predictions, particularly in studies of medical patients, where prediction of the time of death is desired. In addition, the cure model has been proposed to model times of death for discharged patients. However, neither the Cox model nor the cure model allow explicit cure information and prediction of patient cure times (discharge times). In this paper we propose a new model, the "cure time model", which models the static data for dying patients, surviving patients, and their death/cure times jointly. It models (1) mortality via logistic regression and (2) death and discharge times via Cox models. We extend the cure time model to situations with censored data, where neither time of death nor discharge time are known, as well as to multiple (>2) outcomes. In addition, we propose a joint log-odds ratio which can predict the mortality of patients using the information from both the logistic regression and Cox models. We compare our model with the Cox and cure models on a trauma patient dataset from UCSF/San Francisco General Hospital. Our results show that the cure time model more accurately predicts both mortality and time-to-mortality for patients from these datasets. Yuanyang Zhang, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Mitchell J. Cohen, Linda R. Petzold |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2015 | Inferring single-cell gene expression mechanisms using stochastic simulationabstractMOTIVATION: Stochastic promoter switching between transcriptionally active (ON) and inactive (OFF) states is a major source of noise in gene expression. It is often implicitly assumed that transitions between promoter states are memoryless, i.e. promoters spend an exponentially distributed time interval in each of the two states. However, increasing evidence suggests that promoter ON/OFF times can be non-exponential, hinting at more complex transcriptional regulatory architectures. Given the essential role of gene expression in all cellular functions, efficient computational techniques for characterizing promoter architectures are critically needed. RESULTS: We have developed a novel model reduction for promoters with arbitrary numbers of ON and OFF states, allowing us to approximate complex promoter switching behavior with Weibull-distributed ON/OFF times. Using this model reduction, we created bursty Monte Carlo expectation-maximization with modified cross-entropy method ('bursty MCEM(2)'), an efficient parameter estimation and model selection technique for inferring the number and configuration of promoter states from single-cell gene expression data. Application of bursty MCEM(2) to data from the endogenous mouse glutaminase promoter reveals nearly deterministic promoter OFF times, consistent with a multi-step activation mechanism consisting of 10 or more inactive states. Our novel approach to modeling promoter fluctuations together with bursty MCEM(2) provides powerful tools for characterizing transcriptional bursting across genes under different environmental conditions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R source code implementing bursty MCEM(2) is available upon request. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Mohammad Soltani, Linda R. Petzold, Abhyudai Singh |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2012 | Accelerated maximum likelihood parameter estimation for stochastic biochemical systemsabstractBACKGROUND: A prerequisite for the mechanistic simulation of a biochemical system is detailed knowledge of its kinetic parameters. Despite recent experimental advances, the estimation of unknown parameter values from observed data is still a bottleneck for obtaining accurate simulation results. Many methods exist for parameter estimation in deterministic biochemical systems; methods for discrete stochastic systems are less well developed. Given the probabilistic nature of stochastic biochemical models, a natural approach is to choose parameter values that maximize the probability of the observed data with respect to the unknown parameters, a.k.a. the maximum likelihood parameter estimates (MLEs). MLE computation for all but the simplest models requires the simulation of many system trajectories that are consistent with experimental data. For models with unknown parameters, this presents a computational challenge, as the generation of consistent trajectories can be an extremely rare occurrence. RESULTS: We have developed Monte Carlo Expectation-Maximization with Modified Cross-Entropy Method (MCEM(2)): an accelerated method for calculating MLEs that combines advances in rare event simulation with a computationally efficient version of the Monte Carlo expectation-maximization (MCEM) algorithm. Our method requires no prior knowledge regarding parameter values, and it automatically provides a multivariate parameter uncertainty estimate. We applied the method to five stochastic systems of increasing complexity, progressing from an analytically tractable pure-birth model to a computationally demanding model of yeast-polarization. Our results demonstrate that MCEM(2) substantially accelerates MLE computation on all tested models when compared to a stand-alone version of MCEM. Additionally, we show how our method identifies parameter values for certain classes of models more accurately than two recently proposed computationally efficient methods. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides a novel, accelerated version of a likelihood-based parameter estimation method that can be readily applied to stochastic biochemical systems. In addition, our results suggest opportunities for added efficiency improvements that will further enhance our ability to mechanistically simulate biological processes. Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Min K. Roh, Linda R. Petzold, Jarad Niemi |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2012 | Core module biomarker identification with network exploration for breast cancer metastasisabstractBACKGROUND: In a complex disease, the expression of many genes can be significantly altered, leading to the appearance of a differentially expressed "disease module". Some of these genes directly correspond to the disease phenotype, (i.e. "driver" genes), while others represent closely-related first-degree neighbours in gene interaction space. The remaining genes consist of further removed "passenger" genes, which are often not directly related to the original cause of the disease. For prognostic and diagnostic purposes, it is crucial to be able to separate the group of "driver" genes and their first-degree neighbours, (i.e. "core module") from the general "disease module". RESULTS: We have developed COMBINER: COre Module Biomarker Identification with Network ExploRation. COMBINER is a novel pathway-based approach for selecting highly reproducible discriminative biomarkers. We applied COMBINER to three benchmark breast cancer datasets for identifying prognostic biomarkers. COMBINER-derived biomarkers exhibited 10-fold higher reproducibility than other methods, with up to 30-fold greater enrichment for known cancer-related genes, and 4-fold enrichment for known breast cancer susceptible genes. More than 50% and 40% of the resulting biomarkers were cancer and breast cancer specific, respectively. The identified modules were overlaid onto a map of intracellular pathways that comprehensively highlighted the hallmarks of cancer. Furthermore, we constructed a global regulatory network intertwining several functional clusters and uncovered 13 confident "driver" genes of breast cancer metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: COMBINER can efficiently and robustly identify disease core module genes and construct their associated regulatory network. In the same way, it is potentially applicable in the characterization of any disease that can be probed with microarrays. Ruoting Yang, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Linda R. Petzold, Francis J. Doyle III |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2010 | Independent component analysis: Mining microarray data for fundamental human gene expression modules
Jesse M. Engreitz, Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Jonathan J. Marshall, Russ B. Altman |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 2 |
| 2010 | Using Pre-existing Microarray Datasets to Increase Experimental Power: Application to Insulin ResistanceabstractAlthough they have become a widely used experimental technique for identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes, DNA microarrays are notorious for generating noisy data. A common strategy for mitigating the effects of noise is to perform many experimental replicates. This approach is often costly and sometimes impossible given limited resources; thus, analytical methods are needed which increase accuracy at no additional cost. One inexpensive source of microarray replicates comes from prior work: to date, data from hundreds of thousands of microarray experiments are in the public domain. Although these data assay a wide range of conditions, they cannot be used directly to inform any particular experiment and are thus ignored by most DE gene methods. We present the SVD Augmented Gene expression Analysis Tool (SAGAT), a mathematically principled, data-driven approach for identifying DE genes. SAGAT increases the power of a microarray experiment by using observed coexpression relationships from publicly available microarray datasets to reduce uncertainty in individual genes' expression measurements. We tested the method on three well-replicated human microarray datasets and demonstrate that use of SAGAT increased effective sample sizes by as many as 2.72 arrays. We applied SAGAT to unpublished data from a microarray study investigating transcriptional responses to insulin resistance, resulting in a 50% increase in the number of significant genes detected. We evaluated 11 (58%) of these genes experimentally using qPCR, confirming the directions of expression change for all 11 and statistical significance for three. Use of SAGAT revealed coherent biological changes in three pathways: inflammation, differentiation, and fatty acid synthesis, furthering our molecular understanding of a type 2 diabetes risk factor. We envision SAGAT as a means to maximize the potential for biological discovery from subtle transcriptional responses, and we provide it as a freely available software package that is immediately applicable to any human microarray study. Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Alicia Deng, Tracey McLaughlin, Samuel W. Cushman, Margaret C. Cam, Gerald Reaven, Philip S. Tsao, Russ B. Altman |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2008 | M-BISON: Microarray-based integration of data sources using networksabstractBACKGROUND: The accurate detection of differentially expressed (DE) genes has become a central task in microarray analysis. Unfortunately, the noise level and experimental variability of microarrays can be limiting. While a number of existing methods partially overcome these limitations by incorporating biological knowledge in the form of gene groups, these methods sacrifice gene-level resolution. This loss of precision can be inappropriate, especially if the desired output is a ranked list of individual genes. To address this shortcoming, we developed M-BISON (Microarray-Based Integration of data SOurces using Networks), a formal probabilistic model that integrates background biological knowledge with microarray data to predict individual DE genes. RESULTS: M-BISON improves signal detection on a range of simulated data, particularly when using very noisy microarray data. We also applied the method to the task of predicting heat shock-related differentially expressed genes in S. cerevisiae, using an hsf1 mutant microarray dataset and conserved yeast DNA sequence motifs. Our results demonstrate that M-BISON improves the analysis quality and makes predictions that are easy to interpret in concert with incorporated knowledge. Specifically, M-BISON increases the AUC of DE gene prediction from .541 to .623 when compared to a method using only microarray data, and M-BISON outperforms a related method, GeneRank. Furthermore, by analyzing M-BISON predictions in the context of the background knowledge, we identified YHR124W as a potentially novel player in the yeast heat shock response. CONCLUSION: This work provides a solid foundation for the principled integration of imperfect biological knowledge with gene expression data and other high-throughput data sources. Bernie J. Daigle Jr., Russ B. Altman |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |