VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Henrich
dblp:74/7510
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
ballot secrecy |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Enhancing electronic voting machines on the example of Bingo voting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2009 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
coercion resistance |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Enhancing electronic voting machines on the example of Bingo voting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2009 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
electronic voting |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Enhancing electronic voting machines on the example of Bingo voting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2009 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Brief Announcement: Towards Secure Cloud Computing
Christian Henrich, Matthias Huber, Carmen Kempka, Jörn Müller-Quade, Mario Strefler |
SSS | 1 |
| 2009 | Enhancing electronic voting machines on the example of Bingo votingabstractThe main purpose of cryptographic voting schemes is to provide transparency while protecting ballot secrecy and to enable a fast tally. In this paper, we address three major issues of cryptographic voting schemes. First we discuss the problem of secrecy and coercion resistance in the situation of a corrupted voting machine. While hard to obtain in general, we propose and analyze a novel approach that uses encapsulated design and minimizes the information that can compromise ballot secrecy. The second issue we address is the assumption that an adversary does not know which receipts are checked and the problem of receipt stealing. Many voting schemes with receipts share this vulnerability. We provide a solution that increases protection of each vote and which can be generalized for voting schemes that use computers to form the receipt. The last issue discussed in this paper is the question of how an election can be contested. For this, an error or a manipulation must not only be detected but also proven. While the problems and solutions are described for Bingo Voting, we argue that the problems are shared by many cryptographic voting schemes and that the solutions presented in this work give insight in the prerequisites needed for a secure election. Jens-Matthias Bohli, Christian Henrich, Carmen Kempka, Jörn Müller-Quade, Stefan Röhrich |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |