Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian M. Bot
dblp:74/9583
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-2412-6826ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 58% Medical and health informatics · 42% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
deconfounding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Permutation Approach to Assess Confounding in Machine Learning Applications for Digital Health · KDD 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Permutation Approach to Assess Confounding in Machine Learning Applications for Digital Health · KDD 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomic hybridization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | rCGH: a comprehensive array-based genomic profile platform for precision medicine · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | rCGH: a comprehensive array-based genomic profile platform for precision medicine · Bioinform. 2016 |
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | rCGH: a comprehensive array-based genomic profile platform for precision medicine · Bioinform. 2016 |
Medical and health informatics
digital health |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | A Permutation Approach to Assess Confounding in Machine Learning Applications for Digital Health · KDD 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
permutation testing · 0.8inverse probability weighting · 0.8array-based CGH analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | A Permutation Approach to Assess Confounding in Machine Learning Applications for Digital HealthabstractMachine learning applications are often plagued with confounders that can impact the generalizability of the learners. In clinical settings, demographic characteristics often play the role of confounders. Confounding is especially problematic in remote digital health studies where the participants self-select to enter the study, thereby making it difficult to balance the demographic characteristics of participants. One effective approach to combat confounding is to match samples with respect to the confounding variables in order to improve the balance of the data. This procedure, however, leads to smaller datasets and hence negatively impact the inferences drawn from the learners. Alternatively, confounding adjustment methods that make more efficient use of the data (such as inverse probability weighting) usually rely on modeling assumptions, and it is unclear how robust these methods are to violations of these assumptions. Here, instead of proposing a new method to control for confounding, we develop novel permutation based statistical tools to detect and quantify the influence of observed confounders, and estimate the unconfounded performance of the learner. Our tools can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of existing confounding adjustment methods. We evaluate the statistical properties of our methods in a simulation study, and illustrate their application using real-life data from a Parkinson's disease mobile health study collected in an uncontrolled environment. Elias Chaibub Neto, Abhishek Pratap, Thanneer Malai Perumal, Meghasyam Tummalacherla, Brian M. Bot, Lara M. Mangravite, Larsson Omberg |
KDD | 5 |
| 2016 | rCGH: a comprehensive array-based genomic profile platform for precision medicineabstractUNLABELLED: We present rCGH, a comprehensive array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis workflow, integrating computational improvements and functionalities specifically designed for precision medicine. rCGH supports the major microarray platforms, ensures a full traceability and facilitates profiles interpretation and decision-making through sharable interactive visualizations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The rCGH R package is available on bioconductor (under Artistic-2.0). The aCGH-viewer is available at https://fredcommo.shinyapps.io/aCGH_viewer, and the application implementation is freely available for installation at https://github.com/fredcommo/aCGH_viewer CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Frederic Commo, Justin Guinney, Charles Ferté, Brian M. Bot, Celine Lefebvre, Jean-Charles Soria, Fabrice André |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2015 | Summary of the DREAM8 Parameter Estimation Challenge: Toward Parameter Identification for Whole-Cell ModelsabstractWhole-cell models that explicitly represent all cellular components at the molecular level have the potential to predict phenotype from genotype. However, even for simple bacteria, whole-cell models will contain thousands of parameters, many of which are poorly characterized or unknown. New algorithms are needed to estimate these parameters and enable researchers to build increasingly comprehensive models. We organized the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) 8 Whole-Cell Parameter Estimation Challenge to develop new parameter estimation algorithms for whole-cell models. We asked participants to identify a subset of parameters of a whole-cell model given the model's structure and in silico "experimental" data. Here we describe the challenge, the best performing methods, and new insights into the identifiability of whole-cell models. We also describe several valuable lessons we learned toward improving future challenges. Going forward, we believe that collaborative efforts supported by inexpensive cloud computing have the potential to solve whole-cell model parameter estimation. Jonathan R. Karr, Alex H. Williams, Jeremy Zucker, Andreas Raue, Bernhard Steiert, Jens Timmer, Clemens Kreutz, Simon Wilkinson, Brandon A. Allgood, Brian M. Bot, Bruce R. Hoff, Michael R. Kellen, Markus W. Covert, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Pablo Meyer 0001 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 10 |