Puzznic is a tile-matching video game published by Taito in 1989 and ported to many platforms. The player manipulates blocks in a given grid until they match when two or more blocks of the same pattern are adjacent and are removed from play. The goal is to match all patterned blocks in the grid. Puzznic is rich in structure: levels have internal platforms and the blocks are affected by gravity, leading to complex state changes and the possibility of a cascaded series of matches following each move by the player. The puzzle is therefore a significant challenge to model, motivating our study. We study Puzznic from both constraint modelling and AI Planning perspectives, identifying their complementary strengths and weaknesses for this problem. We further exploit our constraint model to produce an automated tool for instance generation, parameterised on the grid, the combination of patterned blocks, and the steps required.

The B2B Meeting Scheduling Optimization Problem (B2BSP) consists of scheduling a set of meetings between given pairs of participants to an event, minimizing idle time periods in participants' schedules, while taking into account participants’ availability and accommodation capacity. Therefore, it constitutes a challenging combinatorial problem in many real-world B2B events. This work presents a comparative study of several approaches to solve this problem. They are based on Constraint Programming (CP), Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) and Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT). The CP approach relies on using global constraints and has been implemented in MiniZinc to be able to compare CP, Lazy Clause Generation and MIP as solving technologies in this setting. A pure MIP encoding is also presented. Finally, an alternative viewpoint is considered under MaxSAT, showing the best performance when considering some implied constraints. Experimental results on real world B2B instances, as well as on crafted ones, show that the MaxSAT approach is the one with the best performance for this problem, exhibiting better solving times, sometimes even orders of magnitude smaller than CP and MIP.

When solving a combinatorial problem using propositional satisfiability (SAT), the encoding of the constraints is of vital importance. Pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints appear frequently in a wide variety of problems. When PB constraints occur together with at-most-one (AMO) constraints over the same variables, they can be combined into PB(AMO) constraints. In this paper we present new encodings for PB(AMO) constraints. Our experiments show that these encodings can be substantially smaller than those of PB constraints and allow many more instances to be solved within a time limit. We also observed that there is no single overall winner among the considered encodings, but efficiency of each encoding may depend on PB(AMO) characteristics such as the magnitude of coefficient values.

We focus on a planning problem based on Plotting, a tile-matching puzzle video game published by Taito. The objective of the game is to remove at least a certain number of coloured blocks from a grid by sequentially shooting blocks into the same grid. The interest and difficulty of Plotting is due to the complex transitions after every shot: various blocks are affected directly, while others can be indirectly affected by gravity. We highlight the difficulties and inefficiencies of modelling and solving Plotting using PDDL, the de-facto standard language for AI planners. We also provide two constraint models that are able to capture the inherent complexities of the problem. In addition, we provide a set of benchmark instances, an instance generator and an extensive experimental comparison demonstrating solving performance with SAT, CP, MIP and a state-of-the-art AI planner.

A sound and complete algorithm for nominal unification of higher-order expressions with a recursive let is described, and shown to run in nondeterministic polynomial time. We also explore specializations like nominal letrec-matching for expressions, for DAGs, and for garbage-free expressions and determine their complexity. We also provide a nominal unification algorithm for higher-order expressions with recursive let and atom-variables, where we show that it also runs in nondeterministic polynomial time. In addition we prove that there is a guessing strategy for nominal unification with letrec and atom-variable that is a trade-off between exponential growth and non-determinism. Nominal matching with variables representing partial letrec-environments is also shown to be in NP. Comment: 37 pages, 9 figures, This paper is an extended version of the conference publication: Manfred Schmidt-Schau{\ss} and Temur Kutsia and Jordi Levy and Mateu Villaret and Yunus Kutz, Nominal Unification of Higher Order Expressions with Recursive Let, LOPSTR-16, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10184, Springer, p 328 -344, 2016. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1608.03771

The Business-to-Business Meeting Scheduling problem consists of scheduling a set of meetings between given pairs of participants to an event, while taking into account participants’ availability and accommodation capacity. A crucial aspect of this problem is that breaks in participants’ schedules should be avoided as much as possible. It constitutes a challenging combinatorial problem that needs to be solved for many real world brokerage events. In this paper we present a comparative study of Constraint Programming (CP), MixedInteger Programming (MIP) and Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) approaches to this problem. The CP approach relies on using global constraints and has been implemented in MiniZinc to be able to compare CP, Lazy Clause Generation and MIP as solving technologies in this setting. We also present a pure MIP encoding. Finally, an alternative viewpoint is considered under MaxSAT, showing best performance when considering some implied constraints. Experiments conducted on real world instances, as well as on crafted ones, show that the MaxSAT approach is the one with the best performance for this problem, exhibiting better solving times, sometimes even orders of magnitude smaller than CP and MIP.

One aspect that has been poorly studied in multiple-valued logics, and in particular in Łukasiewicz logic, is the generation of instances of varying difficulty for evaluating, comparing and improving satisfiability solvers. With the ultimate goal of finding challenging benchmarks for Łukasiewicz satisfiability solvers, we start by defining a natural and intuitive class of clausal forms (simple Ł-clausal forms) and studying their complexity. Since we prove that the satisfiability problem of simple Ł-clausal forms can be solved in linear time, we then define two new classes of clausal forms (Ł-clausal forms and restricted Ł-clausal forms) that truly exploit the non-lattice operations of Łukasiewicz logic and whose satisfiability problems are NP-complete when clauses have at least three literals, and admit linear-time algorithms when clauses have at most two literals. We also define an efficient satisfiability preserving translation of Łukasiewicz logic formulas into Ł-clausal forms. Finally, we describe a random generator of Ł-clausal forms and report on an empirical investigation in which we identify an easy-hard-easy pattern and a phase transition phenomenon for Ł-clausal forms.

Pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints are usually encoded into Boolean clauses using compact Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) representations. Although these constraints appear in many problems, they are particularly useful for representing resource constraints in scheduling problems. Sometimes, the Boolean variables in the PB constraints have implicit at-most-one relations. In this work we introduce a way to take advantage of these implicit relations to obtain a compact Multi-Decision Diagram (MDD) representation for those PB constraints. We provide empirical evidence of the usefulness of this technique for some Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP) variants, namely the Multi-Mode RCPSP (MRCPSP) and the RCPSP with Time-Dependent Resource Capacities and Requests (RCPSP/t). The size reduction of the representation of the PB constraints lets us decrease the number of Boolean variables in the encodings by one order of magnitude. We close/certify the optimum of many instances of these problems.

Planning Modulo Theories (PMT), inspired by Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), allows the integration of arbitrary first order theories, such as linear arithmetic, with propositional planning. Under this setting, planning as SAT is generalized to planning as SMT. In this paper we introduce a new encoding for planning as SMT, which adheres to the relaxed relaxed ∃-step (R 2 ∃-step) semantics for parallel plans. We show the benefits of relaxing the requirements on the set of actions eligible to be executed at the same time, even though many redundant actions can be introduced. We also show how, by a MaxSMT based post-processing step, redundant actions can be efficiently removed, and provide experimental results showing the benefits of this approach.

We present a rule-based Huet’s style anti-unification algorithm for simply typed lambda-terms, which computes a least general higher-order pattern generalization. For a pair of arbitrary terms of the same type, such a generalization always exists and is unique modulo $$\alpha $$ α -equivalence and variable renaming. With a minor modification, the algorithm works for untyped lambda-terms as well. The time complexity of both algorithms is linear.

The Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (MRCPSP) is a generalization of the well known Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP). The most common exact approaches for solving this problem are based on branch-and-bound algorithms, mixed integer linear programming and Boolean satisfiability (SAT). In this paper, we present a new exact approach for solving this problem, using Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). We provide two encodings into SMT and several reformulation and preprocessing techniques. The optimization algorithm that we propose uses an SMT solver as an oracle, and depending on its answer is able to update the encoding for the next optimization step. We report extensive performance experiments showing the utility of the proposed techniques and the good performance of our approach that allows us to close several open instances.

We study nominal anti-unification, which is concerned with computing least general generalizations for given terms-in-context. In general, the problem does not have a least general solution, but if the set of atoms permitted in generalizations is finite, then there exists a least general generalization which is unique modulo variable renaming and alpha-equivalence. We present an algorithm that computes it. The algorithm relies on a subalgorithm that constructively decides equivariance between two terms-in-context. We prove soundness and completeness properties of both algorithms and analyze their complexity. Nominal anti-unification can be applied to problems where generalization of first-order terms is needed (inductive learning, clone detection, etc.), but bindings are involved.

We study anti-unification for unranked terms and hedges that may contain term and hedge variables. The anti-unification problem of two hedges ${\tilde{s}}_1$ and ${\tilde{s}}_2$ is concerned with finding their generalization, a hedge ${\tilde{q}}$ such that both ${\tilde{s}}_1$ and ${\tilde{s}}_2$ are instances of ${\tilde{q}}$ under some substitutions. Hedge variables help to fill in gaps in generalizations, while term variables abstract single (sub)terms with different top function symbols. First, we design a complete and minimal algorithm to compute least general generalizations. Then, we improve the efficiency of the algorithm by restricting possible alternatives permitted in the generalizations. The restrictions are imposed with the help of a rigidity function, which is a parameter in the improved algorithm and selects certain common subsequences from the hedges to be generalized. The obtained rigid anti-unification algorithm is further made more precise by permitting combination of hedge and term variables in generalizations. Finally, we indicate a possible application of the algorithm in software engineering.

We present a rule-based Huet's style anti-unification algorithm for simply-typed lambda-terms in eta-long beta-normal form, which computes a least general higher-order pattern generalization. For a pair of arbitrary terms of the same type, such a generalization always exists and is unique modulo alpha-equivalence and variable renaming. The algorithm computes it in cubic time within linear space. It has been implemented and the code is freely available.

Nominal logic is an extension of first-order logic with equality, name-binding, renaming via name-swapping and freshness of names. Contrarily to lambda-terms, in nominal terms, bindable names, called atoms, and instantiable variables are considered as distinct entities. Moreover, atoms are capturable by instantiations, breaking a fundamental principle of the lambda-calculus. Despite these differences, nominal unification can be seen from a higher-order perspective. From this view, we show that nominal unification can be quadratically reduced to a particular fragment of higher-order unification problems: higher-order pattern unification. We also prove that the translation preserves most generality of unifiers.

We study anti-unification for unranked terms and hedges that may contain term and hedge variables. The anti-unification problem of two hedges ~s_1 and ~s_2 is concerned with finding their generalization, a hedge ~q such that both ~s_1 and ~s_2 are instances of ~q under some substitutions. Hedge variables help to fill in gaps in generalizations, while term variables abstract single (sub)terms with different top function symbols. First, we design a complete and minimal algorithm to compute least general generalizations. Then, we improve the efficiency of the algorithm by restricting possible alternatives permitted in the generalizations. The restrictions are imposed with the help of a rigidity function that is a parameter in the improved algorithm and selects certain common subsequences from the hedges to be generalized. Finally, we indicate a possible application of the algorithm in software engineering.

The presence of uncertainty in the real world makes robustness to be a desired property of solutions to constraint satisfaction problems. Roughly speaking, a solution is robust if it can be easily repaired when unexpected events happen. This issue has already been addressed in the frameworks of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and Constraint Programming (CP). Most works on robustness implement search algorithms to look for such solutions instead of taking the declarative approach of reformulation, since reformulation tends to generate prohibitively large formulas, especially in the CP setting.

Nominal Unification is an extension of first-order unification where terms can contain binders and unification is performed modulo alpha-equivalence. Here we prove that the existence of nominal unifiers can be decided in quadratic time. First, we linearly-reduce nominal unification problems to a sequence of freshness and equalities between atoms, modulo a permutation, using ideas as Paterson and Wegman for first-order unification. Second, we prove that solvability of these reduced problems may be checked in quadratic time. Finally, we point out how using ideas of Brown and Tarjan for unbalanced merging, we could solve these reduced problems more efficiently.

Monadic second-order unification is second-order unification where all function constants occurring in the equations are unary. Here we prove that the problem of deciding whether a set of monadic equations has a unifier is NP-complete, where we use the technique of compressing solutions using singleton context-free grammars. We prove that monadic second-order matching is also NP-complete.