Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaehong Kim 0010
dblp:75/3644-10
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replay · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replay · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › rehearsal-based continual learning
generative replay |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replay · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dual model architecture · 0.3deep generative model · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Continual Learning with Deep Generative ReplayabstractAttempts to train a comprehensive artificial intelligence capable of solving multiple tasks have been impeded by a chronic problem called catastrophic forgetting. Although simply replaying all previous data alleviates the problem, it requires large memory and even worse, often infeasible in real world applications where the access to past data is limited. Inspired by the generative nature of the hippocampus as a short-term memory system in primate brain, we propose the Deep Generative Replay, a novel framework with a cooperative dual model architecture consisting of a deep generative model (“generator”) and a task solving model (“solver”). With only these two models, training data for previous tasks can easily be sampled and interleaved with those for a new task. We test our methods in several sequential learning settings involving image classification tasks. Hanul Shin, Jung Kwon Lee, Jaehong Kim 0010 |
NIPS | 3 |